User:Jukeboksi/Blog/July2005 - Revision history

Jukeboksi: Jukeboksi moved page User:Juboxi/Blog/July2005 to User:Jukeboksi/Blog/July2005: Automatically moved page while renaming the user "Juboxi" to "Jukeboksi"

2017-07-06T15:23:17Z

Jukeboksi moved page User:Juboxi/Blog/July2005 to User:Jukeboksi/Blog/July2005: Automatically moved page while renaming the user "Juboxi" to "Jukeboksi"

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:23, 6 July 2017
(No difference)

Jukeboksi: Juboxi moved page User:Juxo/Blog/July2005 to User:Juboxi/Blog/July2005: Automatically moved page while renaming the user "Juxo" to "Juboxi"

2013-06-14T13:03:58Z

Juboxi moved page User:Juxo/Blog/July2005 to User:Juboxi/Blog/July2005: Automatically moved page while renaming the user "Juxo" to "Juboxi"

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:03, 14 June 2013
(No difference)

Jukeboksi: hot weather and getting abusive distractions all the time... unable to do creative work here now... here is a new classic "Soviet Wikipedia"-thingy

2005-07-15T18:45:41Z

hot weather and getting abusive distractions all the time... unable to do creative work here now... here is a new classic "Soviet Wikipedia"-thingy

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:45, 15 July 2005
Line 1:		Line 1:
			15.07.2005

			http://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Soviet_Wikipedia&diff=177761&oldid=160541
			----
	11.07.2005		11.07.2005

Jukeboksi: some more words for those frustrated and dissapointed with the slow pace of things in past months

2005-07-11T11:07:33Z

some more words for those frustrated and dissapointed with the slow pace of things in past months

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:07, 11 July 2005
Line 1:		Line 1:
			11.07.2005

			This is the R&D wiki for this project and has been so for almost 2,5 years. During this time our plans have been made out for making custom software that have now been ditched in favor of using [[wiki]] to implement some of our planned [[features]]. Plans regarding many things have evolved and obsoleted material is not removed systematically which has lead to this situation where the wiki is internally incoherent and confusing even for oldtimers. I appologise for this laziness in my wiki-tending.

			Sometimes when we get the inspiration to really focus on some real issues we usually try to tackle the ancient problems of [[governance]]. In this kind of project, which is clearly political... it's very aim is to enable [[political consumerism]] much care needs to be put into establishing a power structure that is as lateral as possible because vertical power structures have the downsides of those endowed with more power then the normal user will '''either or both'''
			# become corrupt
			# be falsely accused of [[corruption]]

			Parties that feel their position threatened by [[consumerium]]-type-of-activity will surely aim to derail consumerium by actively inserting [[disinformation]] and those with good intentions might insert [[misinformation]] unknowingly which '''has to be dealt with''' which means that '''we must have sysops''' and as always '''[[trolls]] will attack the sysops''' and attack even more forcefully the '''process by which sysops are appointed''' which is just as it's always been and how it's gotta be.

			--[[User:Juxo\|Juxo]] 11:07, 11 Jul 2005 (GMT)

			----
			09.07.2005

	Sorry that I've been so inactive this spring and begining of summer. I will try to focus more on what's really esssential: Getting to implementation phase. The plan in my head right now is that there will be only one [[wiki]] that will cover all the langauges, though in the starting phase '''only English will be allowed''' for practical reasons. Since [[How Consumerium differs from Wikipedia in a nutshell\|Consumerium is not an encyclopedia]] [[multiple points of view]] can and should be simultanously expressed in many articles that "compete" with each other on popularity ([[votes]]).		Sorry that I've been so inactive this spring and begining of summer. I will try to focus more on what's really esssential: Getting to implementation phase. The plan in my head right now is that there will be only one [[wiki]] that will cover all the langauges, though in the starting phase '''only English will be allowed''' for practical reasons. Since [[How Consumerium differs from Wikipedia in a nutshell\|Consumerium is not an encyclopedia]] [[multiple points of view]] can and should be simultanously expressed in many articles that "compete" with each other on popularity ([[votes]]).

Jukeboksi: I just upgraded this MediaWiki-installation to the latest version to keep us secure.

2005-07-09T17:30:57Z

I just upgraded this MediaWiki-installation to the latest version to keep us secure.

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:30, 9 July 2005
Line 6:		Line 6:

	So to sum it up... To portray a different view point from some other can be done by lateral articles or sub-articleing the article in question. --[[User:Juxo\|Juxo]] 17:29, 9 Jul 2005 (GMT)		So to sum it up... To portray a different view point from some other can be done by lateral articles or sub-articleing the article in question. --[[User:Juxo\|Juxo]] 17:29, 9 Jul 2005 (GMT)

			I just upgraded this [[MediaWiki]]-installation to the latest version to keep us secure.

Jukeboksi: sorry for the inactivity. some thoughts on how to get to implementation

2005-07-09T17:29:30Z

sorry for the inactivity. some thoughts on how to get to implementation

New page

Sorry that I've been so inactive this spring and begining of summer. I will try to focus more on what's really esssential: Getting to implementation phase. The plan in my head right now is that there will be only one [[wiki]] that will cover all the langauges, though in the starting phase '''only English will be allowed''' for practical reasons. Since [[How Consumerium differs from Wikipedia in a nutshell|Consumerium is not an encyclopedia]] [[multiple points of view]] can and should be simultanously expressed in many articles that "compete" with each other on popularity ([[votes]]).

Certain [[Consumerium:reserved words]] will be allowed to be used only where they identify the type of article(s) the subarticle(s) are.

[[Edit wars]] will not be as prominent as they are in [[NPOV]] wiki-projects by letting [[MPOV]] play out in parallel articles and subarticles that can be forced to be linked from the "main"-article by using [[m:User:Juxo/Extensions/ListSubPages]]-extension. In certain places sub-pages can be used to express [[support]] or [[opposition]] of the contents or naming of some article. For example, if someone writes an article named [[SomeProduct/reviews/Product is of low quality]], which is a [[review]] (a reserved word) you can show support (a reserved word) by putting your signature on page [[SomeProduct/reviews/Product is of low quality/seconds]] (as in "second a motion") or opposition by starting an article [[SomeProduct/reviews/Product is good for use]] (a [[lateral article]]) or by creating [[SomeProduct/reviews/Product is of low quality/Above review does not portray reality]] (a [[sub-article]])

So to sum it up... To portray a different view point from some other can be done by lateral articles or sub-articleing the article in question. --[[User:Juxo|Juxo]] 17:29, 9 Jul 2005 (GMT)