Trust model - Revision history

142.177.93.21: copyedit, link interwiki identity standard, faction

2004-03-09T20:28:38Z

copyedit, link interwiki identity standard, faction

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:28, 9 March 2004
Line 1:		Line 1:
	A '''trust model''' is just a map of who [[trust]]s who, when and in what circumstances. It claims '''authoritative ~~identity~~ integrity''', meaning, you are actually trusting who you think you are trusting (see [[identity dispute]]).		A '''trust model''' is just a map of who [[trust]]s who, when and in what circumstances. It claims at least '''authoritative integrity''' with respect to [[identity]], meaning, you are actually trusting who you think you are trusting (see [[identity dispute]], [[interwiki identity standard]], and [[faction]] - the latter for collective and alleged identity).

	It is not [[reputation]] although positive regard, informally called "reputation", can play a major role in deciding whose assertions to believe, or at least which to investigate first. However it does not ''establish'' authoritative integrity - that takes an [[audit]] process, and that process has a form of [[investigative integrity]] which is different.		It is not [[reputation]] although positive regard, informally called "reputation", can play a major role in deciding whose assertions to believe, or at least which to investigate first. However it does not ''establish'' authoritative integrity - that takes an [[audit]] process, and that process has a form of [[investigative integrity]] which is different.

Jukeboksi: authoritative integrity -> authoritative identity integrity

2004-03-09T20:24:25Z

authoritative integrity -> authoritative identity integrity

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:24, 9 March 2004
Line 1:		Line 1:
	A '''trust model''' is just a map of who [[trust]]s who, when and in what circumstances. It claims '''authoritative integrity''', meaning, you are actually trusting who you think you are trusting (see [[identity dispute]]).		A '''trust model''' is just a map of who [[trust]]s who, when and in what circumstances. It claims '''authoritative identity integrity''', meaning, you are actually trusting who you think you are trusting (see [[identity dispute]]).

	It is not [[reputation]] although positive regard, informally called "reputation", can play a major role in deciding whose assertions to believe, or at least which to investigate first. However it does not ''establish'' authoritative integrity - that takes an [[audit]] process, and that process has a form of [[investigative integrity]] which is different.		It is not [[reputation]] although positive regard, informally called "reputation", can play a major role in deciding whose assertions to believe, or at least which to investigate first. However it does not ''establish'' authoritative integrity - that takes an [[audit]] process, and that process has a form of [[investigative integrity]] which is different.

142.177.92.162 at 01:51, 9 March 2004

2004-03-09T01:51:26Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:51, 9 March 2004
Line 1:		Line 1:
	A '''trust model''' is just a map of who [[trust]]s who, when and in what circumstances. It claims '''authoritative integrity''', meaning, you are actually trusting who you think you are trusting~~. It is not~~ [[reputation]] although reputation can play a major role in deciding whose assertions to believe. However it does not ''establish'' authoritative integrity, that takes an [[audit]] process, and that process has a form of [[investigative integrity]].		A '''trust model''' is just a map of who [[trust]]s who, when and in what circumstances. It claims '''authoritative integrity''', meaning, you are actually trusting who you think you are trusting (see [[identity dispute]]).

	[[~~Trademark~~]], [[~~standard label~~]]s and ~~anything~~ that ~~you can~~ [[~~audit~~]] is ~~believed to have some degree of this integrity, or people wouldn't act one way when they saw the mark/label, and another way when they don't~~.		It is not [[reputation]] although positive regard, informally called "reputation", can play a major role in deciding whose assertions to believe, or at least which to investigate first. However it does not ''establish'' authoritative integrity - that takes an [[audit]] process, and that process has a form of [[investigative integrity]] which is different.

	To understand the contrast, consider what happens when you see a term on a label like "fun" or "new" or "more" or "clean" on a label. There is no control or trust model behind these words, so you dismiss them as [[propaganda]].		[[Trademark]], [[standard label]]s and anything that you can [[audit]] is believed to have some degree of this integrity, or people wouldn't act one way when they saw the mark/label, and another way when they don't. [[Brand management]] is the active attempt to interfere with such integrity measures.

			To understand the contrast, consider what happens when you see a term on a label like "fun" or "new" or "more" or "clean" on a label. There is no control or trust model behind these words, so you dismiss them as [[propaganda]]. This makes it actually impossible over time to use these words to mean what they mean in the dictionary.

	Any [[revenue model]] is based on some assumptions about a trust model. This is particularly important in a [[self-funding]] project, but also to the [[Consumerium developers]].		Any [[revenue model]] is based on some assumptions about a trust model. This is particularly important in a [[self-funding]] project, but also to the [[Consumerium developers]].

			See [[repute]] and [[interwiki identity standard]] and [[faction]] for some related concerns. Probably any trust model is mostly [[factionally defined]], as acts that cause one group to trust you more will make others trust you less.

142.177.81.73: hard to define exactly but, has to be done

2003-11-25T01:05:35Z

hard to define exactly but, has to be done

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:05, 25 November 2003
Line 1:		Line 1:
	A '''trust model''' is just a map of who [[trust]]s who, when and in what circumstances. It ~~establishes~~ '''authoritative integrity''', meaning, you are actually trusting who you think you are trusting. It is not [[reputation]] although reputation can play a major role in deciding whose assertions to believe. [[Trademark]], [[standard label]]s and anything that you can [[audit]] is believed to have some degree of this integrity, or people wouldn't act one way when they saw the mark/label, and another way when they don't.		A '''trust model''' is just a map of who [[trust]]s who, when and in what circumstances. It claims '''authoritative integrity''', meaning, you are actually trusting who you think you are trusting. It is not [[reputation]] although reputation can play a major role in deciding whose assertions to believe. However it does not ''establish'' authoritative integrity, that takes an [[audit]] process, and that process has a form of [[investigative integrity]].

			[[Trademark]], [[standard label]]s and anything that you can [[audit]] is believed to have some degree of this integrity, or people wouldn't act one way when they saw the mark/label, and another way when they don't.

	To understand the contrast, consider what happens when you see a term on a label like "fun" or "new" or "more" or "clean" on a label. There is no control or trust model behind these words, so you dismiss them as [[propaganda]].		To understand the contrast, consider what happens when you see a term on a label like "fun" or "new" or "more" or "clean" on a label. There is no control or trust model behind these words, so you dismiss them as [[propaganda]].

	Any [[revenue model]] is based on some assumptions about a trust model. This is particularly important in a [[self-funding]] project, but also to the [[Consumerium developers]].		Any [[revenue model]] is based on some assumptions about a trust model. This is particularly important in a [[self-funding]] project, but also to the [[Consumerium developers]].

142.177.81.73 at 01:04, 25 November 2003

2003-11-25T01:04:35Z

New page

A '''trust model''' is just a map of who [[trust]]s who, when and in what circumstances. It establishes '''authoritative integrity''', meaning, you are actually trusting who you think you are trusting. It is not [[reputation]] although reputation can play a major role in deciding whose assertions to believe. [[Trademark]], [[standard label]]s and anything that you can [[audit]] is believed to have some degree of this integrity, or people wouldn't act one way when they saw the mark/label, and another way when they don't.

To understand the contrast, consider what happens when you see a term on a label like "fun" or "new" or "more" or "clean" on a label. There is no control or trust model behind these words, so you dismiss them as [[propaganda]].

Any [[revenue model]] is based on some assumptions about a trust model. This is particularly important in a [[self-funding]] project, but also to the [[Consumerium developers]].