<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://develop.consumerium.org/w/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=To_be</id>
	<title>To be - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://develop.consumerium.org/w/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=To_be"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://develop.consumerium.org/w/index.php?title=To_be&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-04-14T23:15:54Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.43.6</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://develop.consumerium.org/w/index.php?title=To_be&amp;diff=15365&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>142.177.99.104 at 20:45, 28 July 2004</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://develop.consumerium.org/w/index.php?title=To_be&amp;diff=15365&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2004-07-28T20:45:03Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;Most [[language]]s include a verb &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;to be&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;.  Those who advocate [[E Prime]] consider this verb a [[Bad Thing]].  [[Trolls]] find no clear arguments why this verb might actually &amp;quot;be&amp;quot; a [[Good Thing]], and would ask others to comment:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Faction]]s might actually consider &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;to be&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; to mean something different based on their [[factionally defined]] attitudes, e.g. [[Pinks]] might think of it as based on [[social capital]] and trust, [[Greens]] might think of it as a form of [[ecological wisdom]] and refuse to accept that things &amp;quot;are&amp;quot; except via an [[ecological lens]], etc..  It is not clear if [[becomes, remains, equals]] is any better.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>142.177.99.104</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>