Threats - Revision history

142.177.108.12 at 01:44, 2 March 2004

2004-03-02T01:44:27Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:44, 2 March 2004
Line 3:		Line 3:
	If we do believe they might really happen, they are [[worst cases]].		If we do believe they might really happen, they are [[worst cases]].

	The reason to do [[brainstorming]] to outline threats is the same as to outline [[visions]]: It establishes clearly the limits of what you do and don't believe in, making [[use case]] analysis more efficient and guiding the writing of new [[Consumerium:User Stories\|stories]], while still letting you think "out of the box", construct stories and useful [[conceptual metaphor]], etc.. ~~And,~~ it reveals what you are thinking about the extremes of good and bad, in case someone else reads it and says "hey wait a minute I do believe in that..." in which case they move it to [[best cases]] or [[worst cases]]. To do this in a disciplined way makes it really clear where our various ideas of reality converge and where they do not.		The reason to do [[brainstorming]] to outline threats is the same as to outline [[visions]]: It establishes clearly the limits of what you do and don't believe in, making [[use case]] analysis more efficient and guiding the writing of new [[Consumerium:User Stories\|stories]], while still letting you think "out of the box", construct stories and useful [[conceptual metaphor]], etc.. It lets you list [[bad thing]]s without getting into a lot of rhetoric about it.

			It also reveals what you are thinking about the extremes of good and bad, in case someone else reads it and says "hey wait a minute I do believe in that..." in which case they move it to [[best cases]] or [[worst cases]]. To do this in a disciplined way makes it really clear where our various ideas of reality converge and where they do not. Persistent differences in this might make it obvious where [[faction]]s are.

	Here are some threats:		Here are some threats:

142.177.108.12 at 01:42, 2 March 2004

2004-03-02T01:42:58Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:42, 2 March 2004
Line 3:		Line 3:
	If we do believe they might really happen, they are [[worst cases]].		If we do believe they might really happen, they are [[worst cases]].

	The reason to do [[brainstorming]] to outline threats is the same as to outline [[visions]]: It establishes clearly the limits of what you do and don't believe in, while still letting you think "out of the box", construct stories and useful [[conceptual metaphor]], etc.. And, it reveals what you are thinking about the extremes of good and bad, in case someone else reads it and says "hey wait a minute I do believe in that..." in which case they move it to [[best cases]] or [[worst cases]]. To do this in a disciplined way makes it really clear where our various ideas of reality converge and where they do not.		The reason to do [[brainstorming]] to outline threats is the same as to outline [[visions]]: It establishes clearly the limits of what you do and don't believe in, making [[use case]] analysis more efficient and guiding the writing of new [[Consumerium:User Stories\|stories]], while still letting you think "out of the box", construct stories and useful [[conceptual metaphor]], etc.. And, it reveals what you are thinking about the extremes of good and bad, in case someone else reads it and says "hey wait a minute I do believe in that..." in which case they move it to [[best cases]] or [[worst cases]]. To do this in a disciplined way makes it really clear where our various ideas of reality converge and where they do not.

	Here are some threats:		Here are some threats:

142.177.108.12 at 01:39, 2 March 2004

2004-03-02T01:39:08Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:39, 2 March 2004
Line 6:		Line 6:

	Here are some threats:		Here are some threats:

			0. Consumerium suppresses the [[New Troll point of view]], raising [[neutral point of view]] to religion, empowering cliques, and generally making it impossible to challenge anything they say even if it is totally false. In other words, it degrades into [[Wikipedia]]. Even the same people run it, like the [[Mediawiki]] developers and [[Wikimedia]] founders, who have no values worth respecting.

	1. Lawyers specializing in [[hot potato]] lawsuits only against the poorest members of the [[Consumerium Governance Organization]], and only for doing things that they really need to do to make [[Consumerium governance]] work.		1. Lawyers specializing in [[hot potato]] lawsuits only against the poorest members of the [[Consumerium Governance Organization]], and only for doing things that they really need to do to make [[Consumerium governance]] work.
Line 12:		Line 14:

	3. [[Gus Kouwenhoven]] taking over the CGO and steering it "his" way.		3. [[Gus Kouwenhoven]] taking over the CGO and steering it "his" way.

			4. [[Consumerium:itself]] ignores [[comprehensive outcome]] of its advice. All forests disappear and all things on Earth die as a direct result of its use - for instance, in [[Haiti]], the healthy organically grown rice and beans sold via the [[healthy buying infrastructure]], which take more water and longer cooking to prepare, cause the forests disappear since more [[charcoal]] is used. Meanwhile, in [[Congo]], [[ape extinction]] occurs and forests are totally destroyed as miners and loggers wipe out the forest to get [[tantallum]] to meet the [[hardware requirements]]. By ignoring the deepest outcomes of following its advice, Consumerium itself becomes the worst problem.

142.177.103.239: link brainstorming

2003-12-21T23:49:53Z

link brainstorming

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:49, 21 December 2003
Line 3:		Line 3:
	If we do believe they might really happen, they are [[worst cases]].		If we do believe they might really happen, they are [[worst cases]].

	The reason to outline threats is the same as to outline [[visions]]: It establishes clearly the limits of what you do and don't believe in, while still letting you think "out of the box", construct stories and useful [[conceptual metaphor]], etc.. And, it reveals what you are thinking about the extremes of good and bad, in case someone else reads it and says "hey wait a minute I do believe in that..." in which case they move it to [[best cases]] or [[worst cases]]. To do this in a disciplined way makes it really clear where our various ideas of reality converge and where they do not.		The reason to do [[brainstorming]] to outline threats is the same as to outline [[visions]]: It establishes clearly the limits of what you do and don't believe in, while still letting you think "out of the box", construct stories and useful [[conceptual metaphor]], etc.. And, it reveals what you are thinking about the extremes of good and bad, in case someone else reads it and says "hey wait a minute I do believe in that..." in which case they move it to [[best cases]] or [[worst cases]]. To do this in a disciplined way makes it really clear where our various ideas of reality converge and where they do not.

	Here are some threats:		Here are some threats:

142.177.10.33 at 02:49, 27 October 2003

2003-10-27T02:49:09Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:49, 27 October 2003
Line 11:		Line 11:
	2. Being force-fed [[KitKat McFlurry]] by a [[sysop]].		2. Being force-fed [[KitKat McFlurry]] by a [[sysop]].

	3. [[Gus ~~Keuwenhouven~~]] taking over the CGO and steering it "his" way.		3. [[Gus Kouwenhoven]] taking over the CGO and steering it "his" way.

142.177.10.33 at 02:46, 27 October 2003

2003-10-27T02:46:15Z

New page

'''Threats''' are things so bad we don't actually believe in them.

If we do believe they might really happen, they are [[worst cases]].

The reason to outline threats is the same as to outline [[visions]]: It establishes clearly the limits of what you do and don't believe in, while still letting you think "out of the box", construct stories and useful [[conceptual metaphor]], etc.. And, it reveals what you are thinking about the extremes of good and bad, in case someone else reads it and says "hey wait a minute I *do* believe in that..." in which case they move it to [[best cases]] or [[worst cases]]. To do this in a disciplined way makes it really clear where our various ideas of reality converge and where they do not.

Here are some threats:

1. Lawyers specializing in [[hot potato]] lawsuits only against the poorest members of the [[Consumerium Governance Organization]], and only for doing things that they really need to do to make [[Consumerium governance]] work.

2. Being force-fed [[KitKat McFlurry]] by a [[sysop]].

3. [[Gus Keuwenhouven]] taking over the CGO and steering it "his" way.