<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://develop.consumerium.org/w/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Talk%3AWikipedia_red_faction</id>
	<title>Talk:Wikipedia red faction - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://develop.consumerium.org/w/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Talk%3AWikipedia_red_faction"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://develop.consumerium.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Wikipedia_red_faction&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-05-08T07:13:41Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.43.6</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://develop.consumerium.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Wikipedia_red_faction&amp;diff=15710&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>142.177.93.54 at 19:08, 26 June 2004</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://develop.consumerium.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Wikipedia_red_faction&amp;diff=15710&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2004-06-26T19:08:22Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;I think much of the worry about Red Faction is fairly justified, &lt;br /&gt;
especially considering that their membership is a virtual who&amp;#039;s who of &lt;br /&gt;
problem users, as well as their tendency to try to swarm on various &lt;br /&gt;
issues. It should also be noted that User:Editing Saddam Hussein &lt;br /&gt;
(Better known to the world as Lir) did his work under the red faction &lt;br /&gt;
banner.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That&amp;#039;s not to say that I think RF poses any sort of meaningful &amp;quot;threat&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
- simply put, they&amp;#039;re kind of too scrawny to be worth worrying about. &lt;br /&gt;
But I think that they make a pretty good bellweather. That is, if you &lt;br /&gt;
don&amp;#039;t have time to form a full opinion on an issue, you could do worse &lt;br /&gt;
than looking at RF&amp;#039;s opinion and voting exactly opposite them. -Snowspinner[http://mail.wikipedia.org/pipermail/wikien-l/2004-June/013477.html]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:This more or less proves that [[SVpov]] is exactly opposite of [[Wikipedia Red Faction]] [[POV]], therefore, [[NTPOV]] must be opposite of [[usual happy NPOV talk]] instead.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>142.177.93.54</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>