Talk:Wikipedia Red Faction - Revision history

64.121.65.155 at 01:48, 12 May 2012

2012-05-12T01:48:03Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:48, 12 May 2012
Line 11:		Line 11:
	I heard several sysops pressured plato into disbanding his red faction.--[[User:Genyphur\|Genyphur]] 05:03, 24 Sep 2004 (EEST)		I heard several sysops pressured plato into disbanding his red faction.--[[User:Genyphur\|Genyphur]] 05:03, 24 Sep 2004 (EEST)

	* Are you kidding me? One of the sysops, (not stating the name but can be found easily) was an disgraced assistant to Pierre Salinger in the 1980's.		* Are you kidding me? One of the sysops, (not stating the name but can be found easily) was an disgraced assistant to Pierre Salinger in the 1980's. --[[Special:Contributions/64.121.65.155\|64.121.65.155]] 04:47, 12 May 2012 (EEST)
	--[[Special:Contributions/64.121.65.155\|64.121.65.155]] 04:47, 12 May 2012 (EEST)

64.121.65.155 at 01:47, 12 May 2012

2012-05-12T01:47:37Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:47, 12 May 2012
Line 10:		Line 10:

	I heard several sysops pressured plato into disbanding his red faction.--[[User:Genyphur\|Genyphur]] 05:03, 24 Sep 2004 (EEST)		I heard several sysops pressured plato into disbanding his red faction.--[[User:Genyphur\|Genyphur]] 05:03, 24 Sep 2004 (EEST)

			* Are you kidding me? One of the sysops, (not stating the name but can be found easily) was an disgraced assistant to Pierre Salinger in the 1980's.
			--[[Special:Contributions/64.121.65.155\|64.121.65.155]] 04:47, 12 May 2012 (EEST)

Genyphur at 02:03, 24 September 2004

2004-09-24T02:03:24Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:03, 24 September 2004
Line 8:		Line 8:

	- from [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Richardchilton English Wikipedia User Richardchilton]'s account of [[systemic bias]] of [[Wikimedia]] and the way it contributed to [[Wikipedia Red Faction]]'s eventual and total suppression.		- from [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Richardchilton English Wikipedia User Richardchilton]'s account of [[systemic bias]] of [[Wikimedia]] and the way it contributed to [[Wikipedia Red Faction]]'s eventual and total suppression.

			I heard several sysops pressured plato into disbanding his red faction.--[[User:Genyphur\|Genyphur]] 05:03, 24 Sep 2004 (EEST)

142.177.109.56: cool and accurate quote re: fascists at Wikimedia

2004-09-08T01:17:53Z

cool and accurate quote re: fascists at Wikimedia

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:17, 8 September 2004
Line 1:		Line 1:
	This is bullshit anyway. The real article on the '''Red Faction''' was deleted unaccountably and should be restored, because its a good example of conflict between an ethical minority and an unethical [[sysop power structure]]. Even its ending is a good example of that.		This is bullshit anyway. The real article on the '''Red Faction''' was deleted unaccountably and should be restored, because its a good example of conflict between an ethical minority and an unethical [[sysop power structure]]. Even its ending is a good example of that.

			--------

			"One thing I've noticed is there seems to be a systematic persecution of left-wing users on Wikipedia. Users who do nothing but make POV right-wing rants like User:Ed Poor get made admin. The only admin who tries to help protect left wing users from persecution, User:172, is himself persecuted (Wikipedia:Conflicts_between_users/172, User_talk:172_sysop_status). Other users who might be called left wing like User:Wik are also persecuted (Wikipedia_talk:Requests_for_arbitration/Wik,Wikipedia:Conflicts_between_users/Wik).

			An interesting thing is that the right-wing users are all ultimately and leveraging their ultimate power - that Wikipedia's servers are owned by "Jimbo" Wales, who controls everything, doled out adminships and so forth. I should note that Jimbo, who controls Wikipedia's capital of servers, is a fan of the far right Ayn Rand. The right-wingers base what they want to do on authority - the authority of adminships, where they can ban users and so forth and so on."

			- from [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Richardchilton English Wikipedia User Richardchilton]'s account of [[systemic bias]] of [[Wikimedia]] and the way it contributed to [[Wikipedia Red Faction]]'s eventual and total suppression.

142.177.109.56 at 23:50, 7 September 2004

2004-09-07T23:50:38Z

New page

This is bullshit anyway. The real article on the '''Red Faction''' was deleted unaccountably and should be restored, because its a good example of conflict between an ethical minority and an unethical [[sysop power structure]]. Even its ending is a good example of that.