Talk:Wiki witchhunt - Revision history

142.177.72.107: it's not a wiki witchhunt to assign someone to a Sysop Vandal point of view faction based on their selection of (crappy, inaccurate) sources for articles they republish on CH or whoever

2004-09-08T05:37:30Z

it's not a wiki witchhunt to assign someone to a Sysop Vandal point of view faction based on their selection of (crappy, inaccurate) sources for articles they republish on CH or whoever

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:37, 8 September 2004
Line 12:		Line 12:

	Is it really the case that someone can write lies about [[Craig Hubley]] but they cannot tell the truth about [[Gus Kouwenhoven]], at [[Consumerium]]? If so what good is it?		Is it really the case that someone can write lies about [[Craig Hubley]] but they cannot tell the truth about [[Gus Kouwenhoven]], at [[Consumerium]]? If so what good is it?

			--------------

			It seems entirely reasonable to assume that someone is from a [[faction]] espousing [[Sysop Vandal point of view]] if they dredge up old junk articles that have no credibility at all and republish them here after they've died and started to rot. That is neither [[New Troll point of view]] nor is calling someone an advocate of that [[SVpov]] a [[wiki witchhunt]]: there has been no attempt at [[outing]] or even relating the whole thing to an overall strategy by the [[Wikipedia]] [[sysop power structure]].

142.177.109.56: the hunt begins

2004-09-08T00:49:12Z

the hunt begins

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:49, 8 September 2004
Line 4:		Line 4:

	If you want to know more about it, the more anarchist [[Recyclopedia]] studies it, so see their article on it: *http://recyclopedia.info/wiki/wiki.phtml?title=wiki_witchhunt		If you want to know more about it, the more anarchist [[Recyclopedia]] studies it, so see their article on it: *http://recyclopedia.info/wiki/wiki.phtml?title=wiki_witchhunt

			:Woops censored by [[sysop vandalism]] via [[denial of service attack]] via [[vandalbot]] via Tim... ooh let's not go there.

			-------------

			Seems it ''is'' happening here, with emergence of articles like [[Craig Hubley]]. How should [[Consumerium:We\|we]] respond?

			Is it really the case that someone can write lies about [[Craig Hubley]] but they cannot tell the truth about [[Gus Kouwenhoven]], at [[Consumerium]]? If so what good is it?

142.177.82.151 at 16:02, 3 May 2004

2004-05-03T16:02:23Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:02, 3 May 2004
Line 1:		Line 1:
	'''Recyclopedia is down and there are numerous conspiracy theories floated by trolls about it.''''		'''Recyclopedia is down and there are numerous conspiracy theories floated by trolls about it.''''

			:There is extremely strong circumstantial evidence that [[Wikimedia]] and [[MediaWiki]] promoters were directly involved in [[vandalbot]] attacks just before the final [[denial of service attack]]. It is not clear whether this is what discouraged Recyclopedia's founder from continuing, but it seems likely. This is far more valid than a "conspiracy theory".

	If you want to know more about it, the more anarchist [[Recyclopedia]] studies it, so see their article on it: *http://recyclopedia.info/wiki/wiki.phtml?title=wiki_witchhunt		If you want to know more about it, the more anarchist [[Recyclopedia]] studies it, so see their article on it: *http://recyclopedia.info/wiki/wiki.phtml?title=wiki_witchhunt

Jukeboksi: '''Recyclopedia is down and there are numerous conspiracy theories floated by trolls about it.''''

2004-05-03T11:15:13Z

'''Recyclopedia is down and there are numerous conspiracy theories floated by trolls about it.''''

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:15, 3 May 2004
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Recyclopedia ~~was [[vandalbotted]],~~ and ~~either [[slashdotted]] or [[hacked]] or intimidated~~ by [[~~Wikimedia~~]] ~~out of existence after that~~, ~~depending~~ on ~~who you believe~~. ~~So evidently someone doesn't want this issue discussed too openly~~.		'''Recyclopedia is down and there are numerous conspiracy theories floated by trolls about it.''''

			If you want to know more about it, the more anarchist [[Recyclopedia]] studies it, so see their article on it: *http://recyclopedia.info/wiki/wiki.phtml?title=wiki_witchhunt

142.177.103.64 at 16:26, 2 May 2004

2004-05-02T16:26:09Z

New page

Recyclopedia was [[vandalbotted]], and either [[slashdotted]] or [[hacked]] or intimidated by [[Wikimedia]] out of existence after that, depending on who you believe. So evidently someone doesn't want this issue discussed too openly.