Talk:Urban ecology - Revision history

142.177.92.220 at 09:12, 28 April 2003

2003-04-28T09:12:01Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:12, 28 April 2003
Line 4:		Line 4:

	:Usually the most interesting articles are attacked heavily. See [[w:wealth]] and [[w:political economy]]. I put three interesting cut-outs in [[political economy]] here, and perhaps we need [[wealth]] and [[power]] stated here too alon with the other key concepts:		:Usually the most interesting articles are attacked heavily. See [[w:wealth]] and [[w:political economy]]. I put three interesting cut-outs in [[political economy]] here, and perhaps we need [[wealth]] and [[power]] stated here too alon with the other key concepts:
	*[[safe]], [[done]] are probably [[individual]] ideas		*[[safe]], [[done]] are probably [[individual]] ideas gained from viewing [[ecology]] of some kind ([[urban ecology]], [[industrial ecology]] and of course real natural [[ecology]]). So you get a different mind from living different lives.
	*[[fair]], [[evil]] are probably [[instructional]]		*[[fair]], [[evil]] are probably [[instructional]] - like [[w:moral code]] - or aesthetic - like [[w:moral core]].
	*[[ignore]], [[forgive]] are probably [[social]]		*[[ignore]], [[forgive]] are probably [[social]] maybe tied to [[ecoregion]] - I can ignore or forgive different things in a desert than a boat than a house.
	*[[faction]], [[amoral purchasing]] are [[political]] whatever that means.		*[[faction]], [[amoral purchasing]] are [[political]] whatever that means.

	I think you get all that right, you probably can make [[Consumerium]] work.		I think you get all that right, you probably can make [[Consumerium]] work.

142.177.92.220 at 09:10, 28 April 2003

2003-04-28T09:10:09Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:10, 28 April 2003
Line 4:		Line 4:

	:Usually the most interesting articles are attacked heavily. See [[w:wealth]] and [[w:political economy]]. I put three interesting cut-outs in [[political economy]] here, and perhaps we need [[wealth]] and [[power]] stated here too alon with the other key concepts:		:Usually the most interesting articles are attacked heavily. See [[w:wealth]] and [[w:political economy]]. I put three interesting cut-outs in [[political economy]] here, and perhaps we need [[wealth]] and [[power]] stated here too alon with the other key concepts:
	*[[safe]], [[done]]		*[[safe]], [[done]] are probably [[individual]] ideas
	*[[fair]], [[evil]]		*[[fair]], [[evil]] are probably [[instructional]]
	*[[ignore]], [[forgive]]		*[[ignore]], [[forgive]] are probably [[social]]
	*[[faction]], [[amoral purchasing]]		*[[faction]], [[amoral purchasing]] are [[political]] whatever that means.

	I think you get all that right, you probably can make [[Consumerium]] work.		I think you get all that right, you probably can make [[Consumerium]] work.

142.177.92.220 at 09:08, 28 April 2003

2003-04-28T09:08:21Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:08, 28 April 2003
Line 1:		Line 1:
	'f course, anything thought irrelevant to this place, can just fly away to the english wikipedia (where people will either ignore it, or tear it into pieces :-))		'f course, anything thought irrelevant to this place, can just fly away to the english wikipedia (where people will either ignore it, or tear it into pieces :-))

			:I think if the term is 'out there" and being used by others, it should be in the [[w:urban ecology]] article place, if only so that you can see who else is interested enough ithe concept to edit it, and who then to attract over here.

			:Usually the most interesting articles are attacked heavily. See [[w:wealth]] and [[w:political economy]]. I put three interesting cut-outs in [[political economy]] here, and perhaps we need [[wealth]] and [[power]] stated here too alon with the other key concepts:
			*[[safe]], [[done]]
			*[[fair]], [[evil]]
			*[[ignore]], [[forgive]]
			*[[faction]], [[amoral purchasing]]

			I think you get all that right, you probably can make [[Consumerium]] work.

81.49.198.43 at 08:39, 28 April 2003

2003-04-28T08:39:08Z

New page

'f course, anything thought irrelevant to this place, can just fly away to the english wikipedia (where people will either ignore it, or tear it into pieces :-))