<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://develop.consumerium.org/w/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Talk%3AUnder_debate</id>
	<title>Talk:Under debate - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://develop.consumerium.org/w/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Talk%3AUnder_debate"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://develop.consumerium.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Under_debate&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-05-29T20:45:14Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.43.8</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://develop.consumerium.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Under_debate&amp;diff=13558&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>142.177.92.220 at 08:34, 28 April 2003</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://develop.consumerium.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Under_debate&amp;diff=13558&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2003-04-28T08:34:29Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;Before altering this, I suggest we break it up into different pages on the different subjects, since everything in a wiki is always under debate, having one big page for all of it is annoying.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you think something is controversial, say so at the start.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think the thing that would really really help is if you would read [[political economy]], all of it, I know the links are still mostly wrong (should go to wikipedia, all of them, to keep the context).  But if you knew that then we can talk about [[safe]], [[fair]], [[done]], [[evil]] rationally the way the second article does, and then we can think about [[ignore]] and [[forgive]] and how [[amoral purchasing]] can still be allowed, say locally.  Then we can have factions that disagree on how local, what exceptions, etc, and we will have most of this [[Consumerium]]&amp;#039;s politics figured out.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think we must do this quickly as a year is a long time to wait for the riht people to show up and work hard.  Now they are here so let&amp;#039;s use them.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>142.177.92.220</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>