Talk:Terminal device - Revision history

Jukeboksi at 01:49, 28 August 2005

2005-08-28T01:49:41Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:49, 28 August 2005
Line 8:		Line 8:

	*one that is only good for a [[Nokia]] [[video prototype]]		*one that is only good for a [[Nokia]] [[video prototype]]

			::Heh-heh.

	---------------		---------------

	Most of what's said at [[Talk:worn device]] probably belongs here.		Most of what's said at [[Talk:worn device]] probably belongs here.

			:Propably it does. but I think we'll merge them into a more precise article like [[Check-out Consumerium]] and/or [[Post check-out Consumerium]]

142.177.114.122 at 22:14, 27 August 2005

2005-08-27T22:14:07Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:14, 27 August 2005
Line 8:		Line 8:

	*one that is only good for a [[Nokia]] [[video prototype]]		*one that is only good for a [[Nokia]] [[video prototype]]

			---------------

			Most of what's said at [[Talk:worn device]] probably belongs here.

142.177.76.153 at 04:22, 10 March 2004

2004-03-10T04:22:28Z

New page

These are reasonable statements of terminal device types. Why don't we improve this article, leaving the messy speculation in [[Hardware Requirements]] and the whole issue of video vs. audio presentation aside for now, and think about the minimum that would actually work (i.e. real actual "requirements"). Then we can rename this [[hardware requirements]] <-- note no capital, i.e. no [[w:capital_(economics)]], "required"!

[[Trolls]] seem to think this can all be best done audio-only. But the [[Lowest Troll]] may be a [[funded troll|paid by]] [[Nokia]] to promote their latest junk. Perhaps there are three Consumeria:

*one that works based mostly only on audio and leaving the user's hands free.

*one that looks good on TV but can't be used because it keeps moving the user's eyes away from their kids or their options, and takes both hands and standing still to use

*one that is only good for a [[Nokia]] [[video prototype]]