Talk:Individual buying criteria - Revision history

N8chz at 15:34, 12 May 2004

2004-05-12T15:34:04Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:34, 12 May 2004
Line 12:		Line 12:

	:::Only in that an institution would probably broadcast that it was refusing to compete and raise prices of scarce goods - or, perhaps better, would let poorer people participate and gain economies of scale when institutions buy things.		:::Only in that an institution would probably broadcast that it was refusing to compete and raise prices of scarce goods - or, perhaps better, would let poorer people participate and gain economies of scale when institutions buy things.

			::::Or the attached strings would include a "no [[reverse engineering\|reverse engineer]]" clause

142.177.103.82: economies of scale

2004-04-05T19:13:31Z

economies of scale

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:13, 5 April 2004
Line 10:		Line 10:

	::Would this practice of non-competition differ from the ''typically confidential'' non-competition clauses commonly seen in written contracts?		::Would this practice of non-competition differ from the ''typically confidential'' non-competition clauses commonly seen in written contracts?

			:::Only in that an institution would probably broadcast that it was refusing to compete and raise prices of scarce goods - or, perhaps better, would let poorer people participate and gain economies of scale when institutions buy things.

N8chz at 18:03, 4 April 2004

2004-04-04T18:03:36Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:03, 4 April 2004
Line 8:		Line 8:

	:For example, an institution might choose not to demand or purchase goods that it must compete for against destitute individuals.		:For example, an institution might choose not to demand or purchase goods that it must compete for against destitute individuals.

			::Would this practice of non-competition differ from the ''typically confidential'' non-competition clauses commonly seen in written contracts?

142.177.93.19 at 17:11, 4 April 2004

2004-04-04T17:11:26Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:11, 4 April 2004
Line 4:		Line 4:

	http://www2.iro.umontreal.ca/~paquetse/cgi-bin/wiki.cgi?Create_Normative_Specifications_For_Resource_Allocations		http://www2.iro.umontreal.ca/~paquetse/cgi-bin/wiki.cgi?Create_Normative_Specifications_For_Resource_Allocations

			:Not under that name, which suggests it's about policy. But certainly you could treat the creation of such "specifications" as part of [[institutional buying criteria]] and it is absolutely relevant to other questions like [http://recyclopedia.info/wiki/wiki.phtml?title=monetary_reform monetary reform].

			:For example, an institution might choose not to demand or purchase goods that it must compete for against destitute individuals.

N8chz: question re ontopic

2004-04-04T16:47:43Z

question re ontopic

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:47, 4 April 2004
Line 1:		Line 1:
	There's also non-medical health criteria (like someone who believes that something is bad for them or their family even if a doctor doesn't agree, such as just refusing factory food on grounds you don't know wht's in it), and even [[legal criteria]] (if you are under some obligation to buy only certain types of things, which is usually the case if you are buying for a company or some organization), and probably more... we need some [[user story]] attempts here: vignettes that describe how Consumerium would really be used in practice to guide certain decisions.		There's also non-medical health criteria (like someone who believes that something is bad for them or their family even if a doctor doesn't agree, such as just refusing factory food on grounds you don't know wht's in it), and even [[legal criteria]] (if you are under some obligation to buy only certain types of things, which is usually the case if you are buying for a company or some organization), and probably more... we need some [[user story]] attempts here: vignettes that describe how Consumerium would really be used in practice to guide certain decisions.
			----
			Would the following be apropos vis a vis Consumerium?

			http://www2.iro.umontreal.ca/~paquetse/cgi-bin/wiki.cgi?Create_Normative_Specifications_For_Resource_Allocations

142.177.82.25 at 01:59, 28 January 2004

2004-01-28T01:59:43Z

New page

There's also non-medical health criteria (like someone who believes that something is bad for them or their family even if a doctor doesn't agree, such as just refusing factory food on grounds you don't know wht's in it), and even [[legal criteria]] (if you are under some obligation to buy only certain types of things, which is usually the case if you are buying for a company or some organization), and probably more... we need some [[user story]] attempts here: vignettes that describe how Consumerium would really be used in practice to guide certain decisions.