Talk:Fair trade - Revision history

142.177.92.8: start with the beans

2004-05-04T00:25:34Z

start with the beans

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:25, 4 May 2004
Line 7:		Line 7:

	::We are planning to implement these since many products are processed way beyond just [[Cocoa]], [[Sugar]], [[Coffee]], [[Tea]] etc.		::We are planning to implement these since many products are processed way beyond just [[Cocoa]], [[Sugar]], [[Coffee]], [[Tea]] etc.

			:::Actually cocoa is very processed, much more than coffee or tea or sugar. In fact sugar is almost always consumed with cocoa, so... you have to start with the beans...

	---------		---------
Line 13:		Line 15:

	:Nope --[[User:Juxo\|Juxo]] 13:57, 3 May 2004 (EEST)		:Nope --[[User:Juxo\|Juxo]] 13:57, 3 May 2004 (EEST)

			::Then you have to offer a genuine test as to what is and is not [[fair trade]], that is, list the specific tests/labels. If you can't do this, you can't affect the [[Consumerium buying signal]]. Hand-waving doesn't count.

Jukeboksi: answers

2004-05-03T10:57:33Z

answers

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:57, 3 May 2004
Line 5:		Line 5:

	:You can't seriously tell us that these labels are used by anybody?!?? We can't make them up ourselves, as they are meaningless, and bad grammar besides. Stick to labels actually defined by [[FLO]] please.		:You can't seriously tell us that these labels are used by anybody?!?? We can't make them up ourselves, as they are meaningless, and bad grammar besides. Stick to labels actually defined by [[FLO]] please.

			::We are planning to implement these since many products are processed way beyond just [[Cocoa]], [[Sugar]], [[Coffee]], [[Tea]] etc.

	---------		---------

	At least [[safe trade]] has a reasonable definition thanks to [[Greenpeace]]. If fair trade is defined so badly, perhaps we should just forget about it in our [[standard label]] scheme.		At least [[safe trade]] has a reasonable definition thanks to [[Greenpeace]]. If fair trade is defined so badly, perhaps we should just forget about it in our [[standard label]] scheme.

			:Nope --[[User:Juxo\|Juxo]] 13:57, 3 May 2004 (EEST)

142.177.103.64: stick to FLO scheme

2004-05-02T14:11:34Z

stick to FLO scheme

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:11, 2 May 2004
Line 4:		Line 4:
	Fully Fair Trading is a feature of a company, meaning that the company deals only in fairly traded goods."		Fully Fair Trading is a feature of a company, meaning that the company deals only in fairly traded goods."

	:~~This reads like stupid garbage made up by an idiot.~~ You can't seriously tell us that these labels are used by anybody?!?? We can't make them up ourselves, as they are meaningless, and bad grammar besides.		:You can't seriously tell us that these labels are used by anybody?!?? We can't make them up ourselves, as they are meaningless, and bad grammar besides. Stick to labels actually defined by [[FLO]] please.

	---------		---------

	At least [[safe trade]] has a reasonable definition thanks to [[Greenpeace]]. If fair trade is defined so badly, perhaps we should just forget about it in our [[standard label]] scheme.		At least [[safe trade]] has a reasonable definition thanks to [[Greenpeace]]. If fair trade is defined so badly, perhaps we should just forget about it in our [[standard label]] scheme.

142.177.103.64 at 14:10, 2 May 2004

2004-05-02T14:10:47Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:10, 2 May 2004
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~This reads like stupid garbage made up by an idiot. You can't seriously tell us that these labels are used by anybody?!??~~

	"Fairly traded is a feature of a product.		"Fairly traded is a feature of a product.
	Partially Fairly Traded is a feature of a product, meaning that some raw-materials or parts of the product are fairly traded. (eg. In restaurant meals)		Partially Fairly Traded is a feature of a product, meaning that some raw-materials or parts of the product are fairly traded. (eg. In restaurant meals)
Line 6:		Line 4:
	Fully Fair Trading is a feature of a company, meaning that the company deals only in fairly traded goods."		Fully Fair Trading is a feature of a company, meaning that the company deals only in fairly traded goods."

			:This reads like stupid garbage made up by an idiot. You can't seriously tell us that these labels are used by anybody?!?? We can't make them up ourselves, as they are meaningless, and bad grammar besides.

	---------		---------

	At least [[safe trade]] has a reasonable definition thanks to [[Greenpeace]]. If fair trade is defined so badly, perhaps we should just forget about it in our [[standard label]] scheme.		At least [[safe trade]] has a reasonable definition thanks to [[Greenpeace]]. If fair trade is defined so badly, perhaps we should just forget about it in our [[standard label]] scheme.

142.177.103.64: stupidity

2004-05-02T14:09:59Z

stupidity

New page

This reads like stupid garbage made up by an idiot. You can't seriously tell us that these labels are used by anybody?!??

"Fairly traded is a feature of a product.
Partially Fairly Traded is a feature of a product, meaning that some raw-materials or parts of the product are fairly traded. (eg. In restaurant meals)
Partially Fair Trading is a feature of a company, meaning that some part of the company's business deals with fairly traded products.
Fully Fair Trading is a feature of a company, meaning that the company deals only in fairly traded goods."

---------

At least [[safe trade]] has a reasonable definition thanks to [[Greenpeace]]. If fair trade is defined so badly, perhaps we should just forget about it in our [[standard label]] scheme.