Talk:Creative network - Revision history

142.177.114.15 at 21:13, 10 February 2004

2004-02-10T21:13:30Z

← Older revision	Revision as of 21:13, 10 February 2004
Line 1:	Line 1:
		It is very interesting that the ideas of a [[creative network]] and [[contact network]] prove politically correct for whatever purposes the [[usurper]][[User:Angela]] has in mind for [[Simple English Wikipedia]], while [[social network]] and [[power network]] do not.

		Permitting 'linguistic inferiors' to discuss creative or contact networks, but not social or power networks, is typical of the imperialist mind-set best exemplified by [[User:Angela]].

Angela: same thing again?

2004-02-08T23:28:52Z

same thing again?

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:28, 8 February 2004
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Note: [[w:User:Angela]] deliberately deleted the article referenced as part of a vast [[ad hominem delete]] that has rendered the Simple English Wikipedia an [[enemy project]]. This [[sysop vandalism]] is a direct attack on the purposes of [[Consumerium]] which required good definitions that it did not have to write itself, but now has to... this is one of many reasons Angela was [[driven off by trolls]] today, and will be driven off again and again until she goes away permanently. It is also the reason for the coming troll attacks at [[Simple English Wikipedia]] that will make it more or less useless for any purpose, and certainly an unpleasant project to work on, as all [[enemy projects]] soon will be.

	~~:Nonsense. The article is still there and was never deleted. [[User:Angela\|Angela]] 06:46, 13 Jan 2004 (EET)~~

	::So it is. Apologies for the error. It is very interesting that the ideas of a [[creative network]] and [[contact network]] prove politically correct for your purposes, and [[social network]] and [[power network]] do not. While you look less like a vandal, you look more like a power grabber and imperialist all the time, "Angela". Slowly, your agenda is revealed...

	~~::Permitting 'linguistic inferiors' to discuss creative or contact networks, but not social or power networks, is typical of the imperialist mind-set~~

142.177.8.70: permitting 'linguistic inferiors' to discuss creative or contact networks, but not social or power networks, is typical of the imperialist mind-set

2004-01-14T13:18:55Z

permitting 'linguistic inferiors' to discuss creative or contact networks, but not social or power networks, is typical of the imperialist mind-set

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:18, 14 January 2004
Line 2:		Line 2:

	:Nonsense. The article is still there and was never deleted. [[User:Angela\|Angela]] 06:46, 13 Jan 2004 (EET)		:Nonsense. The article is still there and was never deleted. [[User:Angela\|Angela]] 06:46, 13 Jan 2004 (EET)

			::So it is. Apologies for the error. It is very interesting that the ideas of a [[creative network]] and [[contact network]] prove politically correct for your purposes, and [[social network]] and [[power network]] do not. While you look less like a vandal, you look more like a power grabber and imperialist all the time, "Angela". Slowly, your agenda is revealed...

			::Permitting 'linguistic inferiors' to discuss creative or contact networks, but not social or power networks, is typical of the imperialist mind-set

Angela: refuting claims of deletion

2004-01-13T04:46:06Z

refuting claims of deletion

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:46, 13 January 2004
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Note: [[w:User:Angela]] deliberately deleted the article referenced as part of a vast [[ad hominem delete]] that has rendered the Simple English Wikipedia an [[enemy project]]. This [[sysop vandalism]] is a direct attack on the purposes of [[Consumerium]] which required good definitions that it did not have to write itself, but now has to... this is one of many reasons Angela was [[driven off by trolls]] today, and will be driven off again and again until she goes away permanently. It is also the reason for the coming troll attacks at [[Simple English Wikipedia]] that will make it more or less useless for any purpose, and certainly an unpleasant project to work on, as all [[enemy projects]] soon will be.		Note: [[w:User:Angela]] deliberately deleted the article referenced as part of a vast [[ad hominem delete]] that has rendered the Simple English Wikipedia an [[enemy project]]. This [[sysop vandalism]] is a direct attack on the purposes of [[Consumerium]] which required good definitions that it did not have to write itself, but now has to... this is one of many reasons Angela was [[driven off by trolls]] today, and will be driven off again and again until she goes away permanently. It is also the reason for the coming troll attacks at [[Simple English Wikipedia]] that will make it more or less useless for any purpose, and certainly an unpleasant project to work on, as all [[enemy projects]] soon will be.

			:Nonsense. The article is still there and was never deleted. [[User:Angela\|Angela]] 06:46, 13 Jan 2004 (EET)

142.177.114.228 at 23:08, 7 January 2004

2004-01-07T23:08:19Z

New page

Note: [[w:User:Angela]] deliberately deleted the article referenced as part of a vast [[ad hominem delete]] that has rendered the Simple English Wikipedia an [[enemy project]]. This [[sysop vandalism]] is a direct attack on the purposes of [[Consumerium]] which required good definitions that it did not have to write itself, but now has to... this is one of many reasons Angela was [[driven off by trolls]] today, and will be driven off again and again until she goes away permanently. It is also the reason for the coming troll attacks at [[Simple English Wikipedia]] that will make it more or less useless for any purpose, and certainly an unpleasant project to work on, as all [[enemy projects]] soon will be.