Talk:Consumerium Research pilot - Revision history

142.177.41.102 at 22:06, 7 September 2004

2004-09-07T22:06:03Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:06, 7 September 2004
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Since [[sysop vandal]]s volunteer as guinea pigs in psychological experiments, we need have no consideration for how the pilot project makes them feel. ~~When it's over it will be fairly obvious how to~~ [[~~end Wikimedia~~]] and ~~its influence, i.e.~~ [[~~Bomis~~]]'s ~~influence, and other corporate influence over [[GFDL corpus]]~~.		Since [[sysop vandal]]s volunteer as guinea pigs in psychological experiments, we need have no consideration for how the pilot project makes them feel. By their various illegal and unethical actions they have authorized full frontal assaults on their [[repute]], and exposing of their connections to a degree not equalled yet even by [[Disinfopedia]]'s exposure of US Republican behaviours.

	Obviously if [[Consumerium:We]] cannot expose the real behaviour of puny trivia mongers and casual liars and harassers like [[Bomis]] and [[Wikimedia]] and do serious damage to them, then we have no serious chance of putting a dent in [[Exxon]] or ~~other bogus charities~~. It's a good test of robustness of the overall [[trolling]] methods that [[Research Wiki]] merely amplifies: without determined [[trolls]] we have nothing going on, really. ''See [[talk:trolling]] for a definition of the '''Wikiactivist''' and the role of such activist [[faction]]s in [[text liberation]].''		This ought to be a useful credibility war; When it's over it will be fairly obvious how to [[end Wikimedia]] and its influence, i.e. [[Bomis]]'s influence, and other corporate influence over [[GFDL corpus]].

			It's a good test also of the process of exposing corporate abusers and bogus charities: Obviously if [[Consumerium:We]] cannot expose the real behaviour of puny trivia mongers and casual liars and harassers like [[Bomis]] and [[Wikimedia]] and do serious damage to them, then we have no serious chance of putting a dent in [[Exxon]] or [[Swift Boat Veterans For Truth]]. It's a good test of robustness of the overall [[trolling]] methods that [[Research Wiki]] merely amplifies: without determined [[trolls]] we have nothing going on, really. ''See [[talk:trolling]] for a definition of the '''Wikiactivist''' and the role of such activist [[faction]]s in [[text liberation]].''

142.177.41.102 at 22:02, 7 September 2004

2004-09-07T22:02:57Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:02, 7 September 2004
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Since [[sysop vandal]]s volunteer as guinea pigs in psychological experiments, we need have no consideration for how the pilot project makes them feel. When it's over it will be fairly obvious how to [[end Wikimedia]] and its influence, i.e. [[Bomis]]'s influence, and other corporate influence over [[GFDL corpus]].		Since [[sysop vandal]]s volunteer as guinea pigs in psychological experiments, we need have no consideration for how the pilot project makes them feel. When it's over it will be fairly obvious how to [[end Wikimedia]] and its influence, i.e. [[Bomis]]'s influence, and other corporate influence over [[GFDL corpus]].

	Obviously if [[Consumerium:We]] cannot expose the real behaviour of puny trivia mongers and casual liars and harassers like [[Bomis]] and [[Wikimedia]] and do serious damage to them, then we have no serious chance of putting a dent in [[Exxon]] or other bogus charities. It's a good test of robustness of the overall [[trolling]] methods that [[Research Wiki]] merely amplifies: without determined [[trolls]] we have nothing going on, really. ''See [[talk:trolling]] for the '''Wikiactivist'''.''		Obviously if [[Consumerium:We]] cannot expose the real behaviour of puny trivia mongers and casual liars and harassers like [[Bomis]] and [[Wikimedia]] and do serious damage to them, then we have no serious chance of putting a dent in [[Exxon]] or other bogus charities. It's a good test of robustness of the overall [[trolling]] methods that [[Research Wiki]] merely amplifies: without determined [[trolls]] we have nothing going on, really. ''See [[talk:trolling]] for a definition of the '''Wikiactivist''' and the role of such activist [[faction]]s in [[text liberation]].''

142.177.41.102: liars

2004-09-07T22:02:02Z

liars

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:02, 7 September 2004
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Since [[sysop vandal]]s volunteer as guinea pigs in psychological experiments, we need have no consideration for how the pilot project makes them feel. When it's over it will be fairly obvious how to [[end Wikimedia]] and its influence, i.e. [[Bomis]]'s influence, and other corporate influence over [[GFDL corpus]].		Since [[sysop vandal]]s volunteer as guinea pigs in psychological experiments, we need have no consideration for how the pilot project makes them feel. When it's over it will be fairly obvious how to [[end Wikimedia]] and its influence, i.e. [[Bomis]]'s influence, and other corporate influence over [[GFDL corpus]].

	Obviously if [[Consumerium:We]] cannot expose the real behaviour of puny trivia mongers like [[Bomis]] and [[Wikimedia]] and do serious damage to them, then we have no serious chance of putting a dent in [[Exxon]] or other bogus charities. It's a good test of robustness of the overall [[trolling]] methods that [[Research Wiki]] merely amplifies: without determined [[trolls]] we have nothing going on, really. ''See [[talk:trolling]] for the '''Wikiactivist'''.''		Obviously if [[Consumerium:We]] cannot expose the real behaviour of puny trivia mongers and casual liars and harassers like [[Bomis]] and [[Wikimedia]] and do serious damage to them, then we have no serious chance of putting a dent in [[Exxon]] or other bogus charities. It's a good test of robustness of the overall [[trolling]] methods that [[Research Wiki]] merely amplifies: without determined [[trolls]] we have nothing going on, really. ''See [[talk:trolling]] for the '''Wikiactivist'''.''

142.177.41.102 at 22:00, 7 September 2004

2004-09-07T22:00:22Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:00, 7 September 2004
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Since [[sysop vandal]]s volunteer as guinea pigs in psychological experiments, we need have no consideration for how the pilot project makes them feel. When it's over it will be fairly obvious how to [[end Wikimedia]] and its influence, i.e. [[Bomis]]'s influence, and other corporate influence over [[GFDL corpus]].		Since [[sysop vandal]]s volunteer as guinea pigs in psychological experiments, we need have no consideration for how the pilot project makes them feel. When it's over it will be fairly obvious how to [[end Wikimedia]] and its influence, i.e. [[Bomis]]'s influence, and other corporate influence over [[GFDL corpus]].

			Obviously if [[Consumerium:We]] cannot expose the real behaviour of puny trivia mongers like [[Bomis]] and [[Wikimedia]] and do serious damage to them, then we have no serious chance of putting a dent in [[Exxon]] or other bogus charities. It's a good test of robustness of the overall [[trolling]] methods that [[Research Wiki]] merely amplifies: without determined [[trolls]] we have nothing going on, really. ''See [[talk:trolling]] for the '''Wikiactivist'''.''

142.177.41.102 at 21:57, 7 September 2004

2004-09-07T21:57:58Z

New page

Since [[sysop vandal]]s volunteer as guinea pigs in psychological experiments, we need have no consideration for how the pilot project makes them feel. When it's over it will be fairly obvious how to [[end Wikimedia]] and its influence, i.e. [[Bomis]]'s influence, and other corporate influence over [[GFDL corpus]].