Talk:Bot - Revision history

142.177.93.54 at 19:41, 26 June 2004

2004-06-26T19:41:26Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:41, 26 June 2004
Line 11:		Line 11:

	::Local trolls are the best trolls. But no, there were several repeated and intense attacks in which the vandalbot changed the titles of pages to random ones, and then blanked them, making it quite difficult to restore pages and links. There were at least two such attacks, and these plus the "undoing" of the vandalism increased the traffic. It was probably a third attack that made Recyclopedia exceed its bandwidth limit - thus it was, legally, a [[denial of service attack]].		::Local trolls are the best trolls. But no, there were several repeated and intense attacks in which the vandalbot changed the titles of pages to random ones, and then blanked them, making it quite difficult to restore pages and links. There were at least two such attacks, and these plus the "undoing" of the vandalism increased the traffic. It was probably a third attack that made Recyclopedia exceed its bandwidth limit - thus it was, legally, a [[denial of service attack]].

			-----------

			Looks like [[Wikipedia]] is getting what it deserves - [[blowback]] from the same tactics "Wikipedians" used against [[Recyclopedia]]:[http://mail.wikipedia.org/pipermail/wikien-l/2004-June/013617.html]

142.177.81.243 at 17:52, 11 May 2004

2004-05-11T17:52:21Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:52, 11 May 2004
Line 2:		Line 2:

	:I didn't see any bot attack and i would say i frequented Recyclopedia until it went down. Why hasn't anyone salvaged the mysql from bobo? And as I said earlier I had a little accident and one of my fingers is quite badly hurt so please would you hold with this unrelevant and loosely claimed Wikmedia bashing. --[[User:Juxo\|Juxo]] 21:35, 7 May 2004 (EEST)		:I didn't see any bot attack and i would say i frequented Recyclopedia until it went down. Why hasn't anyone salvaged the mysql from bobo? And as I said earlier I had a little accident and one of my fingers is quite badly hurt so please would you hold with this unrelevant and loosely claimed Wikmedia bashing. --[[User:Juxo\|Juxo]] 21:35, 7 May 2004 (EEST)

			::It's pretty relevant if [[Wikimedia]] thugs are taking down other wikis that just happen to disagree with them.

			--------
			''re "within a week" ''

			:I saw only the local trolls and i have to say i frequented the place. And it run for a month without any attacks. --[[User:Juxo\|Juxo]] 00:05, 10 May 2004 (EEST)

			::Local trolls are the best trolls. But no, there were several repeated and intense attacks in which the vandalbot changed the titles of pages to random ones, and then blanked them, making it quite difficult to restore pages and links. There were at least two such attacks, and these plus the "undoing" of the vandalism increased the traffic. It was probably a third attack that made Recyclopedia exceed its bandwidth limit - thus it was, legally, a [[denial of service attack]].

Jukeboksi: I didn't see any bot attack and i would say i frequented Recyclopedia until it went down

2004-05-07T18:35:33Z

I didn't see any bot attack and i would say i frequented Recyclopedia until it went down

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:35, 7 May 2004
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Probably all [[MediaWiki bot]]s can be used as vandalbots, but it's true that this is not their only use. If there is a publicly available bot framework that was available when [[Recyclopedia]] was up, then, it might be plausible that someone other than [[Erik Moeller]] or [[Tim Starling]] (who had control over all such bots prior to that) launched the attacks against Recyclopedia. Given how fast they happened, and what pages they targetted, it's not credible that someone not already very intimately acquainted with [[MediaWiki bot]]s could have done it, or that someone not promoting [[Wikimedia]] would have bothered. But that doesn't have to be stated to everyone on the planet in an article necessary. There are enough reasons to be wary of those characters, i.e. [[Wikimedia corruption]]. Let's hope calling them on it, keeps them far away. There are also decent developer types like [[Brion Vibber]].		Probably all [[MediaWiki bot]]s can be used as vandalbots, but it's true that this is not their only use. If there is a publicly available bot framework that was available when [[Recyclopedia]] was up, then, it might be plausible that someone other than [[Erik Moeller]] or [[Tim Starling]] (who had control over all such bots prior to that) launched the attacks against Recyclopedia. Given how fast they happened, and what pages they targetted, it's not credible that someone not already very intimately acquainted with [[MediaWiki bot]]s could have done it, or that someone not promoting [[Wikimedia]] would have bothered. But that doesn't have to be stated to everyone on the planet in an article necessary. There are enough reasons to be wary of those characters, i.e. [[Wikimedia corruption]]. Let's hope calling them on it, keeps them far away. There are also decent developer types like [[Brion Vibber]]. --[[142.177.X.X]]

			:I didn't see any bot attack and i would say i frequented Recyclopedia until it went down. Why hasn't anyone salvaged the mysql from bobo? And as I said earlier I had a little accident and one of my fingers is quite badly hurt so please would you hold with this unrelevant and loosely claimed Wikmedia bashing. --[[User:Juxo\|Juxo]] 21:35, 7 May 2004 (EEST)

142.177.103.162 at 12:56, 7 May 2004

2004-05-07T12:56:49Z

New page

Probably all [[MediaWiki bot]]s can be used as vandalbots, but it's true that this is not their only use. If there is a publicly available bot framework that was available when [[Recyclopedia]] was up, then, it might be plausible that someone other than [[Erik Moeller]] or [[Tim Starling]] (who had control over all such bots prior to that) launched the attacks against Recyclopedia. Given how fast they happened, and what pages they targetted, it's not credible that someone not already very intimately acquainted with [[MediaWiki bot]]s could have done it, or that someone not promoting [[Wikimedia]] would have bothered. But that doesn't have to be stated to everyone on the planet in an article necessary. There are enough reasons to be wary of those characters, i.e. [[Wikimedia corruption]]. Let's hope calling them on it, keeps them far away. There are also decent developer types like [[Brion Vibber]].