Talk:Bluetooth - Revision history

67.85.129.51 at 19:17, 3 July 2005

2005-07-03T19:17:59Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:17, 3 July 2005
Line 8:		Line 8:
	Keep an eye out for [[802.16]] Metropolitan Area Networks. 2-10GHz and 10-66GHz bands, very high speeds. Intel and Nokia are involved. I'll write more on this if it seems to be gaining momentum [[User:Juxo\|Juxo]] 13:45 Jul 20, 2003 (EEST)		Keep an eye out for [[802.16]] Metropolitan Area Networks. 2-10GHz and 10-66GHz bands, very high speeds. Intel and Nokia are involved. I'll write more on this if it seems to be gaining momentum [[User:Juxo\|Juxo]] 13:45 Jul 20, 2003 (EEST)

	Great. Does that mean that we won't need Wi-Fi, but just Bluetooth capable devices to get on the internet?		''- Great. Does that mean that we won't need Wi-Fi, but just Bluetooth capable devices to get on the internet?
			I.G.''

67.85.129.51 at 19:17, 3 July 2005

2005-07-03T19:17:21Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:17, 3 July 2005
Line 7:		Line 7:

	Keep an eye out for [[802.16]] Metropolitan Area Networks. 2-10GHz and 10-66GHz bands, very high speeds. Intel and Nokia are involved. I'll write more on this if it seems to be gaining momentum [[User:Juxo\|Juxo]] 13:45 Jul 20, 2003 (EEST)		Keep an eye out for [[802.16]] Metropolitan Area Networks. 2-10GHz and 10-66GHz bands, very high speeds. Intel and Nokia are involved. I'll write more on this if it seems to be gaining momentum [[User:Juxo\|Juxo]] 13:45 Jul 20, 2003 (EEST)

			Great. Does that mean that we won't need Wi-Fi, but just Bluetooth capable devices to get on the internet?

142.177.103.216: not so good

2004-01-21T22:41:19Z

not so good

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:41, 21 January 2004
Line 3:		Line 3:

	:Good news for [[Bluetooth]] enthusiasts: IEEE is in the process of developing a new WLAN standard :802.11n. According to Finnish sources the only specs for now are that it will work on '''5GHz band''' and reach 100Mbps. [[User:Juxo\|Juxo]] 15:22, 20 Jan 2004 (EET)		:Good news for [[Bluetooth]] enthusiasts: IEEE is in the process of developing a new WLAN standard :802.11n. According to Finnish sources the only specs for now are that it will work on '''5GHz band''' and reach 100Mbps. [[User:Juxo\|Juxo]] 15:22, 20 Jan 2004 (EET)

			::Bad news for trolls, though. Who can keep up with all the crap broadcast at 100Mbps and correct it?

	Keep an eye out for [[802.16]] Metropolitan Area Networks. 2-10GHz and 10-66GHz bands, very high speeds. Intel and Nokia are involved. I'll write more on this if it seems to be gaining momentum [[User:Juxo\|Juxo]] 13:45 Jul 20, 2003 (EEST)		Keep an eye out for [[802.16]] Metropolitan Area Networks. 2-10GHz and 10-66GHz bands, very high speeds. Intel and Nokia are involved. I'll write more on this if it seems to be gaining momentum [[User:Juxo\|Juxo]] 13:45 Jul 20, 2003 (EEST)

Jukeboksi: Good news for Bluetooth enthusiasts: IEEE is onto 802.11n

2004-01-20T13:22:08Z

Good news for Bluetooth enthusiasts: IEEE is onto 802.11n

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:22, 20 January 2004
Line 1:		Line 1:
	----		----
	I wish that the future WLAN specs and products would use 5Ghz [[ISM]] band, like 802.11a and some HiperLANs do, but we'll have to see what's going to happen [[User:Juxo\|Juxo]] 16:50 Jun 5, 2003 (EEST)		I wish that the future WLAN specs and products would use 5Ghz [[ISM]] band, like 802.11a and some HiperLANs do, but we'll have to see what's going to happen [[User:Juxo\|Juxo]] 16:50 Jun 5, 2003 (EEST)

			:Good news for [[Bluetooth]] enthusiasts: IEEE is in the process of developing a new WLAN standard :802.11n. According to Finnish sources the only specs for now are that it will work on '''5GHz band''' and reach 100Mbps. [[User:Juxo\|Juxo]] 15:22, 20 Jan 2004 (EET)

	Keep an eye out for [[802.16]] Metropolitan Area Networks. 2-10GHz and 10-66GHz bands, very high speeds. Intel and Nokia are involved. I'll write more on this if it seems to be gaining momentum [[User:Juxo\|Juxo]] 13:45 Jul 20, 2003 (EEST)		Keep an eye out for [[802.16]] Metropolitan Area Networks. 2-10GHz and 10-66GHz bands, very high speeds. Intel and Nokia are involved. I'll write more on this if it seems to be gaining momentum [[User:Juxo\|Juxo]] 13:45 Jul 20, 2003 (EEST)

Jukeboksi: Keep an eye out for 802.16 Metropolitan Area Networks.

2003-07-20T13:45:48Z

Keep an eye out for 802.16 Metropolitan Area Networks.

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:45, 20 July 2003
Line 1:		Line 1:

	----		----
	I wish that the future WLAN specs and products would use 5Ghz [[ISM]] band, like 802.11a and some HiperLANs do, but we'll have to see what's going to happen [[User:Juxo\|Juxo]] 16:50 Jun 5, 2003 (EEST)		I wish that the future WLAN specs and products would use 5Ghz [[ISM]] band, like 802.11a and some HiperLANs do, but we'll have to see what's going to happen [[User:Juxo\|Juxo]] 16:50 Jun 5, 2003 (EEST)

			Keep an eye out for [[802.16]] Metropolitan Area Networks. 2-10GHz and 10-66GHz bands, very high speeds. Intel and Nokia are involved. I'll write more on this if it seems to be gaining momentum [[User:Juxo\|Juxo]] 13:45 Jul 20, 2003 (EEST)

Jukeboksi at 14:25, 19 June 2003

2003-06-19T14:25:17Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:25, 19 June 2003
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~===Bluetooth 1.2===~~
	* Backward compatible with 1.1
	* Baseband platform already available from [[Ericsson]] Techonology Licensing
	* Adaptative Frequency Hopping ([[AFH]]) provides better immunity to interference from other devices (such as 802.11 devices)
	* [[Scatternet]] ability (Running multiple [[Piconet]]s simultaneously, making it possible to interconnect piconets)
	* Extended SCO (ESCO) (whatever that means)
	* Improved [[QoS]]
	* Faster connections then in 1.1


	~~===Bluetooth 2.0===~~
	~~'''First news/rumors'''~~


	* Backward compatible with 1.1 and 1.2
	* This version is rumored to contain new speeds of 4,8 and 12 Mbps.
	* A new way of communication: non-hopping narrowband connections, which sounds like a broadcast channel that can be read by all devices in the coverage area.
	* 2.0 dispenses with the master/slave situation making every device able to keep a piconet running, while as in the 1.1 spec if the master leaves the piconet is dropped for all slaves
	* The release of the 2.0 specification will propably be delayed to 2004, even though there are already prototypes running in Ericssons labs
	----		----
	I wish that the future WLAN specs and products would use 5Ghz [[ISM]] band, like 802.11a and some HiperLANs do, but we'll have to see what's going to happen [[User:Juxo\|Juxo]] 16:50 Jun 5, 2003 (EEST)		I wish that the future WLAN specs and products would use 5Ghz [[ISM]] band, like 802.11a and some HiperLANs do, but we'll have to see what's going to happen [[User:Juxo\|Juxo]] 16:50 Jun 5, 2003 (EEST)

Jukeboksi: some early info on Bluetooth 1.2 and 2.0

2003-06-18T19:42:26Z

some early info on Bluetooth 1.2 and 2.0

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:42, 18 June 2003
Line 1:		Line 1:
			===Bluetooth 1.2===
			* Backward compatible with 1.1
			* Baseband platform already available from [[Ericsson]] Techonology Licensing
			* Adaptative Frequency Hopping ([[AFH]]) provides better immunity to interference from other devices (such as 802.11 devices)
			* [[Scatternet]] ability (Running multiple [[Piconet]]s simultaneously, making it possible to interconnect piconets)
			* Extended SCO (ESCO) (whatever that means)
			* Improved [[QoS]]
			* Faster connections then in 1.1


			===Bluetooth 2.0===
			'''First news/rumors'''


			* Backward compatible with 1.1 and 1.2
			* This version is rumored to contain new speeds of 4,8 and 12 Mbps.
			* A new way of communication: non-hopping narrowband connections, which sounds like a broadcast channel that can be read by all devices in the coverage area.
			* 2.0 dispenses with the master/slave situation making every device able to keep a piconet running, while as in the 1.1 spec if the master leaves the piconet is dropped for all slaves
			* The release of the 2.0 specification will propably be delayed to 2004, even though there are already prototypes running in Ericssons labs
			----
	I wish that the future WLAN specs and products would use 5Ghz [[ISM]] band, like 802.11a and some HiperLANs do, but we'll have to see what's going to happen [[User:Juxo\|Juxo]] 16:50 Jun 5, 2003 (EEST)		I wish that the future WLAN specs and products would use 5Ghz [[ISM]] band, like 802.11a and some HiperLANs do, but we'll have to see what's going to happen [[User:Juxo\|Juxo]] 16:50 Jun 5, 2003 (EEST)

Jukeboksi: note on the 5GHz ISM band

2003-06-05T16:50:21Z

note on the 5GHz ISM band

New page

I wish that the future WLAN specs and products would use 5Ghz [[ISM]] band, like 802.11a and some HiperLANs do, but we'll have to see what's going to happen [[User:Juxo|Juxo]] 16:50 Jun 5, 2003 (EEST)