Talk:Anarcopedia - Revision history

Jukeboksi: Jukeboksi moved page Talk:Anarchopedia to Talk:Anarcopedia: Text replacement - "Anarchopedia" to "Anarcopedia"

2021-04-12T14:01:27Z

Jukeboksi moved page Talk:Anarchopedia to Talk:Anarcopedia: Text replacement - "Anarchopedia" to "Anarcopedia"

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:01, 12 April 2021
(No difference)

Jukeboksi: Text replacement - "Anarchopedia" to "Anarcopedia"

2021-04-12T14:01:23Z

Text replacement - "Anarchopedia" to "Anarcopedia"

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:01, 12 April 2021
Line 8:		Line 8:
	Moved from article by [[User:Juxo\|Juxo]]		Moved from article by [[User:Juxo\|Juxo]]

	The ~~Anarchopedia~~'s policy effort builds on prior efforts at [[Recyclopedia]] - an attempt to build a [[large public wiki]] without use of [[sysop]] powers at all. This failed however when many pages were renamed, censored, attacked, vandalized and moved by overt supporters of [[Wikimedia]] - ''this is not disputed'' - who had preferential access to [[vandalbot]] technology developed by [[Tim Starling]], - ''this is not disputed'' - a notable advocate of [[technological escalation]] - likely to prevent the [[New Troll point of view]] from spreading. The Recyclopedia failed, and evidence of the above was largely removed from view.		The Anarcopedia's policy effort builds on prior efforts at [[Recyclopedia]] - an attempt to build a [[large public wiki]] without use of [[sysop]] powers at all. This failed however when many pages were renamed, censored, attacked, vandalized and moved by overt supporters of [[Wikimedia]] - ''this is not disputed'' - who had preferential access to [[vandalbot]] technology developed by [[Tim Starling]], - ''this is not disputed'' - a notable advocate of [[technological escalation]] - likely to prevent the [[New Troll point of view]] from spreading. The Recyclopedia failed, and evidence of the above was largely removed from view.

	:I'll get back to disputing all of this when I get my email working and dig up Bobo's email address from somewhere.		:I'll get back to disputing all of this when I get my email working and dig up Bobo's email address from somewhere.

216.127.68.137: conspiracy theories are fun

2005-02-04T07:08:36Z

conspiracy theories are fun

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:08, 4 February 2005
Line 3:		Line 3:

	:I recall you previously claiming that the attacks lasted for several months and my personal experience as a user of [[Recyclopedia]] contrasts this claim that you made and now you have revised your story. How can I trust you on the above claim. --[[User:Juxo\|Juxo]] 14:33, 26 Jan 2005 (EET)		:I recall you previously claiming that the attacks lasted for several months and my personal experience as a user of [[Recyclopedia]] contrasts this claim that you made and now you have revised your story. How can I trust you on the above claim. --[[User:Juxo\|Juxo]] 14:33, 26 Jan 2005 (EET)
			::''a human cannot rename twenty pages to random strings and then blank them all in one minute''—tell that to [[w:User:Willy on Wheels\|the Willy on Wheels]]. :-) He claims to use nothing more complex than tabbed browsing [http://apple.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=135333&threshold=-1&commentsort=0&tid=215&mode=thread&cid=11292880]. [[User:216.127.68.137\|216.127.68.137]] 09:08, 4 Feb 2005 (EET)
	----		----

Line 13:		Line 13:

	::Forget what "Bobo" says. Just look at the actual logs.		::Forget what "Bobo" says. Just look at the actual logs.


	:::Logs? Give us a link.		:::Logs? Give us a link.

	:::Yes, that would be very interesting...		:::Yes, that would be very interesting...

			:Ooh, a conspiracy theory! (All completely unproven and probably unprovable, of course, like any good conspiracy theory. . .) Duder, a computer-literate adolescent could have done what you describe. He wouldn't need to be a Wikimedia supporter, he wouldn't need Tim Starling's help, and he wouldn't necessarily have to have any motivation apart from a cheap thrill—all he would need is competence in a scripting language (Javascript would probably suffice) and a working knowledge of MediaWiki. [[User:216.127.68.137\|216.127.68.137]] 09:08, 4 Feb 2005 (EET)

193.191.141.65 at 16:07, 30 January 2005

2005-01-30T16:07:54Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:07, 30 January 2005
Line 16:		Line 16:

	:::Logs? Give us a link.		:::Logs? Give us a link.

			:::Yes, that would be very interesting...

Jukeboksi: if the logs are somewhere pls give a link

2005-01-27T11:36:12Z

if the logs are somewhere pls give a link

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:36, 27 January 2005
Line 13:		Line 13:

	::Forget what "Bobo" says. Just look at the actual logs.		::Forget what "Bobo" says. Just look at the actual logs.


			:::Logs? Give us a link.

142.177.106.91 at 20:43, 26 January 2005

2005-01-26T20:43:40Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:43, 26 January 2005
Line 11:		Line 11:

	:I'll get back to disputing all of this when I get my email working and dig up Bobo's email address from somewhere.		:I'll get back to disputing all of this when I get my email working and dig up Bobo's email address from somewhere.

			::Forget what "Bobo" says. Just look at the actual logs.

Jukeboksi: moved para that I'm going to dispute. You can't say whose vandalbot code it was unless you are in on the attack and are playing both sides to smear Tim and Wikimedia

2005-01-26T12:33:04Z

moved para that I'm going to dispute. You can't say whose vandalbot code it was unless you are in on the attack and are playing both sides to smear Tim and Wikimedia

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:33, 26 January 2005
Line 1:		Line 1:
	There is no "speculation" here, a human cannot rename twenty pages to random strings and then blank them all in one minute, and that's exactly what was happening in the last week at [[Recyclopedia]], over and over again. That was a [[vandalbot]] attack, and no one watching it could say any different.		There is no "speculation" here, a human cannot rename twenty pages to random strings and then blank them all in one minute, and that's exactly what was happening in the last week at [[Recyclopedia]], over and over again. That was a [[vandalbot]] attack, and no one watching it could say any different.


			:I recall you previously claiming that the attacks lasted for several months and my personal experience as a user of [[Recyclopedia]] contrasts this claim that you made and now you have revised your story. How can I trust you on the above claim. --[[User:Juxo\|Juxo]] 14:33, 26 Jan 2005 (EET)

			----

			Moved from article by [[User:Juxo\|Juxo]]

			The Anarchopedia's policy effort builds on prior efforts at [[Recyclopedia]] - an attempt to build a [[large public wiki]] without use of [[sysop]] powers at all. This failed however when many pages were renamed, censored, attacked, vandalized and moved by overt supporters of [[Wikimedia]] - ''this is not disputed'' - who had preferential access to [[vandalbot]] technology developed by [[Tim Starling]], - ''this is not disputed'' - a notable advocate of [[technological escalation]] - likely to prevent the [[New Troll point of view]] from spreading. The Recyclopedia failed, and evidence of the above was largely removed from view.

			:I'll get back to disputing all of this when I get my email working and dig up Bobo's email address from somewhere.

142.177.108.161 at 23:25, 25 January 2005

2005-01-25T23:25:52Z

New page

There is no "speculation" here, a human cannot rename twenty pages to random strings and then blank them all in one minute, and that's exactly what was happening in the last week at [[Recyclopedia]], over and over again. That was a [[vandalbot]] attack, and no one watching it could say any different.