https://develop.consumerium.org/w/index.php?action=history&feed=atom&title=Talk%3AAmoral_purchasingTalk:Amoral purchasing - Revision history2026-05-04T12:32:42ZRevision history for this page on the wikiMediaWiki 1.43.6https://develop.consumerium.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Amoral_purchasing&diff=13552&oldid=prev142.177.94.33 at 21:23, 26 April 20032003-04-26T21:23:43Z<p></p>
<p><b>New page</b></p><div>This seems to be about the individual's idea of [[w:fair trade]] or [[w:safe trade]] and so is about the individual's basic ideas of [[fair]] and [[safe]].<br />
<br />
It cannot be about what the individual thinks is "[[done]]" because nothing is really "done" until the [[political economy]] says it is, i.e. there is no more recourse to challenge the transaction without challenging the whole "system".<br />
<br />
But, we all have our own ideas of what is "done" anyway, just like what is hitting "[[back]]". So if we can't define these four words for ourselves we probably cannot say what is moral. Something like that is said in [[m:Simple View of Ethics and Morals]] and maybe that should be our guide to where to focus? Or what to ask [[Consumerium]] users to determine their morality for purposes of telling them what we think they should know?<br />
<br />
"Micro-economics of consumerium" we might call this question, but we need to know what is at least not justifiable consumption, e.g. Kit-Kat McFlurry for an obese person.</div>142.177.94.33