Talk:142.177.X.X/Anti Wikipedia Rants - Revision history

Sock puppet at 19:28, 13 April 2004

2004-04-13T19:28:11Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:28, 13 April 2004
Line 12:		Line 12:

	Vandal - someone whose contributes to Wikipedia without the approval of a self-selecting governing cabal that rules by insult and intimidation. [[User:Sock puppet\|Sock puppet]] 10:32, 13 Apr 2004 (EEST)		Vandal - someone whose contributes to Wikipedia without the approval of a self-selecting governing cabal that rules by insult and intimidation. [[User:Sock puppet\|Sock puppet]] 10:32, 13 Apr 2004 (EEST)

			See also: [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Gun_Shy]. Really, this isn't a joke. It's a life and death matter.

Sock puppet: analysis of colonial language is not a joke, though the analyst might offer a wink. This is a valid comparison. Or is this another site that censors discourse to affect political control?

2004-04-13T18:00:16Z

analysis of colonial language is not a joke, though the analyst might offer a wink. This is a valid comparison. Or is this another site that censors discourse to affect political control?

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:00, 13 April 2004
Line 8:		Line 8:

	----		----

			Insurgent -- someone on the streets of Iraq after dark who gets shot by United States snipers.

	Vandal - someone whose contributes to Wikipedia without the approval of a self-selecting governing cabal that rules by insult and intimidation. [[User:Sock puppet\|Sock puppet]] 10:32, 13 Apr 2004 (EEST)		Vandal - someone whose contributes to Wikipedia without the approval of a self-selecting governing cabal that rules by insult and intimidation. [[User:Sock puppet\|Sock puppet]] 10:32, 13 Apr 2004 (EEST)

Jukeboksi: no jokes about iraq please

2004-04-13T09:30:40Z

no jokes about iraq please

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:30, 13 April 2004
Line 8:		Line 8:

	----		----

	~~Insurgent -- someone on the streets of Iraq after dark who gets shot by United States snipers.~~

	Vandal - someone whose contributes to Wikipedia without the approval of a self-selecting governing cabal that rules by insult and intimidation. [[User:Sock puppet\|Sock puppet]] 10:32, 13 Apr 2004 (EEST)		Vandal - someone whose contributes to Wikipedia without the approval of a self-selecting governing cabal that rules by insult and intimidation. [[User:Sock puppet\|Sock puppet]] 10:32, 13 Apr 2004 (EEST)

Sock puppet at 07:32, 13 April 2004

2004-04-13T07:32:48Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:32, 13 April 2004
Line 10:		Line 10:

	Insurgent -- someone on the streets of Iraq after dark who gets shot by United States snipers.		Insurgent -- someone on the streets of Iraq after dark who gets shot by United States snipers.

	Vandal - someone whose contributes to Wikipedia without the approval of a self-selecting governing cabal that rules by insult and intimidation. [[User:Sock puppet\|Sock puppet]] 10:32, 13 Apr 2004 (EEST)		Vandal - someone whose contributes to Wikipedia without the approval of a self-selecting governing cabal that rules by insult and intimidation. [[User:Sock puppet\|Sock puppet]] 10:32, 13 Apr 2004 (EEST)

Sock puppet: wink ; - )

2004-04-13T07:32:15Z

wink ; - )

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:32, 13 April 2004
Line 6:		Line 6:

	Many Wikipedians are stupid, and many are liars, certainly those "in charge" are both. However, that's not relevant, what's relevant is, not letting those people take charge here, and also not repeating the mistakes that let that kind of people take charge.		Many Wikipedians are stupid, and many are liars, certainly those "in charge" are both. However, that's not relevant, what's relevant is, not letting those people take charge here, and also not repeating the mistakes that let that kind of people take charge.

			----

			Insurgent -- someone on the streets of Iraq after dark who gets shot by United States snipers.
			Vandal - someone whose contributes to Wikipedia without the approval of a self-selecting governing cabal that rules by insult and intimidation. [[User:Sock puppet\|Sock puppet]] 10:32, 13 Apr 2004 (EEST)

142.177.75.54: it's a fair representation of the critique of Wikipedia by MANY parties

2004-02-20T17:29:02Z

it's a fair representation of the critique of Wikipedia by MANY parties

New page

You endanger the project by marginalizing critiques of Wikipedia as if they were just one person's opinion:

[[Wikipedia]] has made very serious mistakes that are destroying it. These include not having an independent board (for [[Wikimedia]]), developing its own software ([[mediawiki]]), running governance with a mailing list, having a [[GodKing]], encouraging [[ad hominem delete]] and other [[sysop vandalism]]. MANY people complain about ALL of these things, and have written eloquent long essays about why they are bad mistakes. If you don't want to read all these, or become an expert in [[Wiki management]] and [[wiki code]], they have to be compressed in one account of every issue. For better or worse, we've got that.

Unless you want these things done also by the same people in your [[Content Wiki]] and [[Opinion Wiki]], you will have to clearly state what's wrong with these policies, and why you aren't going to let [[Consumerium Governance Organization]] make any of these mistakes.

Many Wikipedians are stupid, and many are liars, certainly those "in charge" are both. However, that's not relevant, what's relevant is, not letting those people take charge here, and also not repeating the mistakes that let that kind of people take charge.