Reputation - Revision history

142.177.92.162: moving text

2004-03-09T01:42:30Z

moving text

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:42, 9 March 2004
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~'''Reputation''' is~~ [[~~factionally defined~~]], that is, a [[faction]] must exist in order to decide whether someone has high or low [[social capital]]. This is not something that [[Consumerium Services]] themselves can rely on very directly. Our [[trust model]] should have no direct relationship to this idea.		#REDIRECT [[repute]]

	[[Troll]]s tend to believe that all reputation is bad, that having a "high" or "good" reputation just implies [[groupthink]] is in effect and that someone has taken advantage of it, and that it is more heroic to remain anonymous (but still traceable).

142.177.81.103 at 19:16, 25 November 2003

2003-11-25T19:16:24Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:16, 25 November 2003
Line 1:		Line 1:
	'''Reputation''' is [[factionally defined]], that is, a [[faction]] must exist in order to decide whether someone has high or low [[social capital]]. This is not something that [[Consumerium Services]] themselves can rely on very directly. Our [[trust model]] should have no direct relationship to this idea.		'''Reputation''' is [[factionally defined]], that is, a [[faction]] must exist in order to decide whether someone has high or low [[social capital]]. This is not something that [[Consumerium Services]] themselves can rely on very directly. Our [[trust model]] should have no direct relationship to this idea.

			[[Troll]]s tend to believe that all reputation is bad, that having a "high" or "good" reputation just implies [[groupthink]] is in effect and that someone has taken advantage of it, and that it is more heroic to remain anonymous (but still traceable).

142.177.81.103 at 19:15, 25 November 2003

2003-11-25T19:15:24Z

New page

'''Reputation''' is [[factionally defined]], that is, a [[faction]] must exist in order to decide whether someone has high or low [[social capital]]. This is not something that [[Consumerium Services]] themselves can rely on very directly. Our [[trust model]] should have no direct relationship to this idea.