Reds - Revision history

Support a unified GFDL Corpus at 13:06, 15 August 2004

2004-08-15T13:06:20Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:06, 15 August 2004
Line 1:		Line 1:
	'''Reds''' are a notable global [[faction]] of people with common values.		'''Reds''' are a notable global [[faction]] of people with common values.

			[[Consumerium:We\|We]] hope the [[Wikipedia red faction]] will come and regroup here before taking another crack at the racists and fascists there!

	''The rest of what is said here is controversial and intends to summarize how Reds will fit into the [[Consumerium social club]] and influence perhaps the [[Consumerium Governance Organization]]. Since Reds must define their own values and concerns, '''''no one who does not consider themselves a Red''''' should edit this article - what is here is only for illustration & discussion, and a copy of the original has been archived, so feel free to REDit this now.''		''The rest of what is said here is controversial and intends to summarize how Reds will fit into the [[Consumerium social club]] and influence perhaps the [[Consumerium Governance Organization]]. Since Reds must define their own values and concerns, '''''no one who does not consider themselves a Red''''' should edit this article - what is here is only for illustration & discussion, and a copy of the original has been archived, so feel free to REDit this now.''

142.177.81.73: restoring with note - basically, a non-Red should not edit this page now, it should be up to Reds to define

2003-11-24T21:36:33Z

restoring with note - basically, a non-Red should not edit this page now, it should be up to Reds to define

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:36, 24 November 2003
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~#REDIRECT~~ [[~~Silly colorology~~]]		'''Reds''' are a notable global [[faction]] of people with common values.

			''The rest of what is said here is controversial and intends to summarize how Reds will fit into the [[Consumerium social club]] and influence perhaps the [[Consumerium Governance Organization]]. Since Reds must define their own values and concerns, '''''no one who does not consider themselves a Red''''' should edit this article - what is here is only for illustration & discussion, and a copy of the original has been archived, so feel free to REDit this now.''

			Used politically it will usually refer to anti-capitalists, specifically communists, who adopted this as their signal colour long ago. It stands for the blood shed by workers in the wage slavery system, and by soldiers in the wars started by capitalists for their own profit (yeah ok don't blame me I'm just the [[troll]]). They tend to really dislike workplace practices that exploit people like [[prison labour]] or [[child labour]] or [[slavery]], although they see these as part of capitalism. They often focus on specific individual media barons or corporate figures as 'the worst problem' at any point in time, and distrust even [[Greens]] and [[Pinks]] in many cases.

			Accordingly, there will likely be a [[faction]] of Reds in the [[Consumerium social club]] and they very likely will insist on some [[factionally defined]] terms and [[standard label]]s for products produced by [[fair trade]] criteria.

			They will probably ''not'' want their own [[Consortium license]] because of their ideological objections to [[patent]] and [[copyright]] law in general. They may advocate the [[Consumerium License]] just becoming the [[GPL]], or having no license at all as some kind of protest. When asked how specific [[bad copy problem]]s or [[self-interested fork problem]]s will be dealt with, and how [[worst cases]] and [[threats]] related to these will be averted, their answer will always be "these are all symptoms of capitalism - they will not go away until capitalism is smashed - so if these happen then just smash capitalism" etc. etc. rant rave.

			They will also likely be quite active in the [[content wiki]] - Communists are great reporters of facts, since they suspect everyone and everything with any connection to capitalism, and will always find "a fly in the ointment". For this very reason, however, their analysis tends not to be as strong or objective as that of [[Greens]], and, they tend to be pretty damn boring too.

			Don't let them do your marketing either. They hate marketing, maybe because they're so bad at it.

			They are also good at [[municipal government]]. Many [[European cities]] are run by Reds, and these might be willing to use the [[Consumerium buying signal]] to make actual [[public sector buying decision]]s. That'd be great!

80.186.81.123: #REDIRECT Silly colorology

2003-11-24T20:41:20Z

#REDIRECT Silly colorology

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:41, 24 November 2003
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~'''Reds''' are a notable global~~ [[~~faction~~]] ~~of people with common values.~~		#REDIRECT [[Silly colorology]]

	Used politically it will usually refer to anti-capitalists, specifically communists, who adopted this as their signal colour long ago. It stands for the blood shed by workers in the wage slavery system, and by soldiers in the wars started by capitalists for their own profit (yeah ok don't blame me I'm just the [[troll]]). They tend to really dislike workplace practices that exploit people like [[prison labour]] or [[child labour]] or [[slavery]], although they see these as part of capitalism. They often focus on specific individual media barons or corporate figures as 'the worst problem' at any point in time, and distrust even [[Greens]] and [[Pinks]] in many cases.

	Accordingly, there will likely be a [[faction]] of Reds in the [[Consumerium social club]] and they very likely will insist on some [[factionally defined]] terms and [[standard label]]s for products produced by [[fair trade]] criteria.

	They will probably ''not'' want their own [[Consortium license]] because of their ideological objections to [[patent]] and [[copyright]] law in general. They may advocate the [[Consumerium License]] just becoming the [[GPL]], or having no license at all as some kind of protest. When asked how specific [[bad copy problem]]s or [[self-interested fork problem]]s will be dealt with, and how [[worst cases]] and [[threats]] related to these will be averted, their answer will always be "these are all symptoms of capitalism - they will not go away until capitalism is smashed - so if these happen then just smash capitalism" etc. etc. rant rave.

	They will also likely be quite active in the [[content wiki]] - Communists are great reporters of facts, since they suspect everyone and everything with any connection to capitalism, and will always find "a fly in the ointment". For this very reason, however, their analysis tends not to be as strong or objective as that of [[Greens]], and, they tend to be pretty damn boring too.

	~~Don't let them do your marketing either. They hate marketing, maybe because they're so bad at it.~~

	They are also good at [[municipal government]]. Many [[European cities]] are run by Reds, and these might be willing to use the [[Consumerium buying signal]] to make actual [[public sector buying decision]]s. That'd be great!

142.177.81.73: you're wrong, this is a faction and they will fight at every level to express their values in the system - either you CHOOSE the level they factionally define things, or they mess up everythin

2003-11-24T20:29:21Z

you're wrong, this is a faction and they will fight at every level to express their values in the system - either you CHOOSE the level they factionally define things, or they mess up everythin

← Older revision	Revision as of 20:29, 24 November 2003
Line 1:	Line 1:
		'''Reds''' are a notable global [[faction]] of people with common values.

		Used politically it will usually refer to anti-capitalists, specifically communists, who adopted this as their signal colour long ago. It stands for the blood shed by workers in the wage slavery system, and by soldiers in the wars started by capitalists for their own profit (yeah ok don't blame me I'm just the [[troll]]). They tend to really dislike workplace practices that exploit people like [[prison labour]] or [[child labour]] or [[slavery]], although they see these as part of capitalism. They often focus on specific individual media barons or corporate figures as 'the worst problem' at any point in time, and distrust even [[Greens]] and [[Pinks]] in many cases.

		Accordingly, there will likely be a [[faction]] of Reds in the [[Consumerium social club]] and they very likely will insist on some [[factionally defined]] terms and [[standard label]]s for products produced by [[fair trade]] criteria.

		They will probably ''not'' want their own [[Consortium license]] because of their ideological objections to [[patent]] and [[copyright]] law in general. They may advocate the [[Consumerium License]] just becoming the [[GPL]], or having no license at all as some kind of protest. When asked how specific [[bad copy problem]]s or [[self-interested fork problem]]s will be dealt with, and how [[worst cases]] and [[threats]] related to these will be averted, their answer will always be "these are all symptoms of capitalism - they will not go away until capitalism is smashed - so if these happen then just smash capitalism" etc. etc. rant rave.

		They will also likely be quite active in the [[content wiki]] - Communists are great reporters of facts, since they suspect everyone and everything with any connection to capitalism, and will always find "a fly in the ointment". For this very reason, however, their analysis tends not to be as strong or objective as that of [[Greens]], and, they tend to be pretty damn boring too.

		Don't let them do your marketing either. They hate marketing, maybe because they're so bad at it.

		They are also good at [[municipal government]]. Many [[European cities]] are run by Reds, and these might be willing to use the [[Consumerium buying signal]] to make actual [[public sector buying decision]]s. That'd be great!

80.186.81.123: emptying

2003-11-24T15:54:47Z

emptying

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:54, 24 November 2003
Line 1:		Line 1:
	'''Reds''' refer to anti-capitalists, specifically communists, who adopted this as their signal colour long ago. It stands for the blood shed by workers in the wage slavery system, and by soldiers in the wars started by capitalists for their own profit (yeah ok don't blame me I'm just the [[troll]]). They tend to really dislike workplace practices that exploit people like [[prison labour]] or [[child labour]] or [[slavery]], although they see these as part of capitalism. They often focus on specific individual media barons or corporate figures as 'the worst problem' at any point in time, and distrust even [[Greens]] and [[Pinks]] in many cases.

	Accordingly, there will likely be a [[faction]] of Reds in the [[Consumerium social club]] and they very likely will insist on some [[factionally defined]] terms and [[standard label]]s for products produced by [[fair trade]] criteria.

	They will probably ''not'' want their own [[Consortium license]] because of their ideological objections to [[patent]] and [[copyright]] law in general. They may advocate the [[Consumerium License]] just becoming the [[GPL]], or having no license at all as some kind of protest. When asked how specific [[bad copy problem]]s or [[self-interested fork problem]]s will be dealt with, and how [[worst cases]] and [[threats]] related to these will be averted, their answer will always be "these are all symptoms of capitalism - they will not go away until capitalism is smashed - so if these happen then just smash capitalism" etc. etc. rant rave.

	They will also likely be quite active in the [[content wiki]] - Communists are great reporters of facts, since they suspect everyone and everything with any connection to capitalism, and will always find "a fly in the ointment". For this very reason, however, their analysis tends not to be as strong or objective as that of [[Greens]], and, they tend to be pretty damn boring too.

	~~Don't let them do your marketing either. They hate marketing, maybe because they're so bad at it.~~

	They are also good at [[municipal government]]. Many [[European cities]] are run by Reds, and these might be willing to use the [[Consumerium buying signal]] to make actual [[public sector buying decision]]s. That'd be great!

142.177.82.78 at 08:50, 24 November 2003

2003-11-24T08:50:35Z

New page

'''Reds''' refer to anti-capitalists, specifically communists, who adopted this as their signal colour long ago. It stands for the blood shed by workers in the wage slavery system, and by soldiers in the wars started by capitalists for their own profit (yeah ok don't blame me I'm just the [[troll]]). They tend to really dislike workplace practices that exploit people like [[prison labour]] or [[child labour]] or [[slavery]], although they see these as part of capitalism. They often focus on specific individual media barons or corporate figures as 'the worst problem' at any point in time, and distrust even [[Greens]] and [[Pinks]] in many cases.

Accordingly, there will likely be a [[faction]] of Reds in the [[Consumerium social club]] and they very likely will insist on some [[factionally defined]] terms and [[standard label]]s for products produced by [[fair trade]] criteria.

They will probably ''not'' want their own [[Consortium license]] because of their ideological objections to [[patent]] and [[copyright]] law in general. They may advocate the [[Consumerium License]] just becoming the [[GPL]], or having no license at all as some kind of protest. When asked how specific [[bad copy problem]]s or [[self-interested fork problem]]s will be dealt with, and how [[worst cases]] and [[threats]] related to these will be averted, their answer will always be "these are all symptoms of capitalism - they will not go away until capitalism is smashed - so if these happen then just smash capitalism" etc. etc. rant rave.

They will also likely be quite active in the [[content wiki]] - Communists are great reporters of facts, since they suspect everyone and everything with any connection to capitalism, and will always find "a fly in the ointment". For this very reason, however, their analysis tends not to be as strong or objective as that of [[Greens]], and, they tend to be pretty damn boring too.

Don't let them do your marketing either. They hate marketing, maybe because they're so bad at it.

They are also good at [[municipal government]]. Many [[European cities]] are run by Reds, and these might be willing to use the [[Consumerium buying signal]] to make actual [[public sector buying decision]]s. That'd be great!