Recyclopedia - Revision history

Jukeboksi: tyop

2012-04-24T12:18:08Z

tyop

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:18, 24 April 2012
Line 1:		Line 1:
	'''Recyclopedia does not exist any more''		'''Recyclopedia does not exist any more'''

	'''Recyclopedia''' (at [http://www.recyclopedia.info recyclopedia.info]) is probably the most closely aligned [[essential projects\|encyclopedia project]] using the [[wikitext standard]] pioneered by [[mediawiki]] and now better implemented in [[GetWiki]]. It appears to be an aspect of the [[Wikinfo]] project.		'''Recyclopedia''' (at [http://www.recyclopedia.info recyclopedia.info]) is probably the most closely aligned [[essential projects\|encyclopedia project]] using the [[wikitext standard]] pioneered by [[mediawiki]] and now better implemented in [[GetWiki]]. It appears to be an aspect of the [[Wikinfo]] project.

Jukeboksi: noting that recyclopedia no longer exists

2012-04-24T12:17:36Z

noting that recyclopedia no longer exists

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:17, 24 April 2012
Line 1:		Line 1:
	'''~~UPDATE:~~ Recyclopedia ~~is apparently up and in violation of GFDL requires a password to access.'~~''		'''Recyclopedia does not exist any more''

	'''Recyclopedia''' (at [http://www.recyclopedia.info recyclopedia.info]) is probably the most closely aligned [[essential projects\|encyclopedia project]] using the [[wikitext standard]] pioneered by [[mediawiki]] and now better implemented in [[GetWiki]]. It appears to be an aspect of the [[Wikinfo]] project.		'''Recyclopedia''' (at [http://www.recyclopedia.info recyclopedia.info]) is probably the most closely aligned [[essential projects\|encyclopedia project]] using the [[wikitext standard]] pioneered by [[mediawiki]] and now better implemented in [[GetWiki]]. It appears to be an aspect of the [[Wikinfo]] project.
Line 10:		Line 10:

	''See also [http://www.recyclopedia.info/wiki/?title=User:ThomasKalka ThomasKalka's suggestion] that http://coforum.de become the German Recyclopedia - de.recyclopedia.info and coforum.de would then be synonyms. Can our [[Lowest Troll]] help set up fi.recyclopedia.info as well?''		''See also [http://www.recyclopedia.info/wiki/?title=User:ThomasKalka ThomasKalka's suggestion] that http://coforum.de become the German Recyclopedia - de.recyclopedia.info and coforum.de would then be synonyms. Can our [[Lowest Troll]] help set up fi.recyclopedia.info as well?''

			[[Category:Projects that no longer exist]]

Jukeboksi: UPDATE: Recyclopedia is apparently up and in violation of GFDL requires a password to access.

2004-05-20T10:45:59Z

UPDATE: Recyclopedia is apparently up and in violation of GFDL requires a password to access.

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:45, 20 May 2004
Line 1:		Line 1:
	'''UPDATE: Recyclopedia is ~~down maybe for ever~~.'''		'''UPDATE: Recyclopedia is apparently up and in violation of GFDL requires a password to access.'''

	'''Recyclopedia''' (at [http://www.recyclopedia.info recyclopedia.info]) is probably the most closely aligned [[essential projects\|encyclopedia project]] using the [[wikitext standard]] pioneered by [[mediawiki]] and now better implemented in [[GetWiki]]. It appears to be an aspect of the [[Wikinfo]] project.		'''Recyclopedia''' (at [http://www.recyclopedia.info recyclopedia.info]) is probably the most closely aligned [[essential projects\|encyclopedia project]] using the [[wikitext standard]] pioneered by [[mediawiki]] and now better implemented in [[GetWiki]]. It appears to be an aspect of the [[Wikinfo]] project.

Jukeboksi: '''Recyclopedia is down maybe for ever.'''

2004-04-25T11:55:49Z

'''Recyclopedia is down maybe for ever.'''

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:55, 25 April 2004
Line 1:		Line 1:
			'''UPDATE: Recyclopedia is down maybe for ever.'''

	'''Recyclopedia''' (at [http://www.recyclopedia.info recyclopedia.info]) is probably the most closely aligned [[essential projects\|encyclopedia project]] using the [[wikitext standard]] pioneered by [[mediawiki]] and now better implemented in [[GetWiki]]. It appears to be an aspect of the [[Wikinfo]] project.		'''Recyclopedia''' (at [http://www.recyclopedia.info recyclopedia.info]) is probably the most closely aligned [[essential projects\|encyclopedia project]] using the [[wikitext standard]] pioneered by [[mediawiki]] and now better implemented in [[GetWiki]]. It appears to be an aspect of the [[Wikinfo]] project.

142.177.114.219 at 20:09, 1 April 2004

2004-04-01T20:09:20Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:09, 1 April 2004
Line 6:		Line 6:

	''See some proposed [http://recyclopedia.info/wiki/wiki.phtml?title=Talk:Recyclopedia:Feature Recyclopedia features] to see if they converge with our needs here, and should perhaps be in [[GetWiki]] for their use and ours.''		''See some proposed [http://recyclopedia.info/wiki/wiki.phtml?title=Talk:Recyclopedia:Feature Recyclopedia features] to see if they converge with our needs here, and should perhaps be in [[GetWiki]] for their use and ours.''

			''See also [http://www.recyclopedia.info/wiki/?title=User:ThomasKalka ThomasKalka's suggestion] that http://coforum.de become the German Recyclopedia - de.recyclopedia.info and coforum.de would then be synonyms. Can our [[Lowest Troll]] help set up fi.recyclopedia.info as well?''

142.177.92.162 at 00:05, 9 March 2004

2004-03-09T00:05:20Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:05, 9 March 2004
Line 1:		Line 1:
	'''Recyclopedia''' (at [http://www.recyclopedia.info recyclopedia.info]) is probably the most closely aligned [[essential projects\|encyclopedia project]] using the [[wikitext standard]] pioneered by [[mediawiki]] and now better implemented in [[GetWiki]]. It appears to be an aspect of the [[Wikinfo]] project.		'''Recyclopedia''' (at [http://www.recyclopedia.info recyclopedia.info]) is probably the most closely aligned [[essential projects\|encyclopedia project]] using the [[wikitext standard]] pioneered by [[mediawiki]] and now better implemented in [[GetWiki]]. It appears to be an aspect of the [[Wikinfo]] project.

	We might consider these to be the best prototype yet of the future [[Development Wiki]]; It is certainly going to attract like-minded people. The odds of a typical [[Recyclopedia contributor]] becoming a [[Consumerium contributor]] are likely much higher than the odds of a [[Wikipedia]], [[Metaweb]] or [[Disinfopedia]] contributor doing so. It seems that it is devoted to presenting a negotiated [[consensus]] between [[Reds]] and [[Greens]] and various [[anarchist]] views.		We might consider these to be the best prototype yet of the future [[Development Wiki]]; It is certainly going to attract like-minded people.

	''Accordingly, if a lot of these users come over we may need to recruit some [[Blues]] or [[Pinks]] to balance these rather hardcore views. One problem at a time.''		The odds of a typical [[Recyclopedia contributor]] becoming a [[Consumerium contributor]] are likely much higher than the odds of a [[Wikipedia]], [[Metaweb]] or [[Disinfopedia]] contributor doing so. It seems that it is devoted to presenting a negotiated [[consensus]] between [[Reds]] and [[Greens]] and various [[anarchist]] views. ''Accordingly, if a lot of these users come over we may need to recruit some [[Blues]] or [[Pinks]] to balance these rather hardcore views. One problem at a time.''

			''See some proposed [http://recyclopedia.info/wiki/wiki.phtml?title=Talk:Recyclopedia:Feature Recyclopedia features] to see if they converge with our needs here, and should perhaps be in [[GetWiki]] for their use and ours.''

142.177.92.162: typo

2004-03-08T20:46:46Z

typo

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:46, 8 March 2004
Line 1:		Line 1:
	'''Recyclopedia''' (at [http://www.recyclopedia.info) recyclopedia.info] is probably the most closely aligned [[essential projects\|encyclopedia project]] using the [[wikitext standard]] pioneered by [[mediawiki]] and now better implemented in [[GetWiki]]. It appears to be an aspect of the [[Wikinfo]] project.		'''Recyclopedia''' (at [http://www.recyclopedia.info recyclopedia.info]) is probably the most closely aligned [[essential projects\|encyclopedia project]] using the [[wikitext standard]] pioneered by [[mediawiki]] and now better implemented in [[GetWiki]]. It appears to be an aspect of the [[Wikinfo]] project.

	We might consider these to be the best prototype yet of the future [[Development Wiki]]; It is certainly going to attract like-minded people. The odds of a typical [[Recyclopedia contributor]] becoming a [[Consumerium contributor]] are likely much higher than the odds of a [[Wikipedia]], [[Metaweb]] or [[Disinfopedia]] contributor doing so. It seems that it is devoted to presenting a negotiated [[consensus]] between [[Reds]] and [[Greens]] and various [[anarchist]] views.		We might consider these to be the best prototype yet of the future [[Development Wiki]]; It is certainly going to attract like-minded people. The odds of a typical [[Recyclopedia contributor]] becoming a [[Consumerium contributor]] are likely much higher than the odds of a [[Wikipedia]], [[Metaweb]] or [[Disinfopedia]] contributor doing so. It seems that it is devoted to presenting a negotiated [[consensus]] between [[Reds]] and [[Greens]] and various [[anarchist]] views.

	''Accordingly, if a lot of these users come over we may need to recruit some [[Blues]] or [[Pinks]] to balance these rather hardcore views. One problem at a time.''		''Accordingly, if a lot of these users come over we may need to recruit some [[Blues]] or [[Pinks]] to balance these rather hardcore views. One problem at a time.''

142.177.92.162: typo

2004-03-08T20:46:22Z

typo

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:46, 8 March 2004
Line 1:		Line 1:
	'''Recyclopedia''' (at [http://www.recyclopedia.info recyclopedia.info] is probably the most closely aligned [[essential projects\|encyclopedia project]] using the [[wikitext standard]] pioneered by [[mediawiki]] and now better implemented in [[GetWiki]]. It appears to be an aspect of the [[Wikinfo]] project.		'''Recyclopedia''' (at [http://www.recyclopedia.info) recyclopedia.info] is probably the most closely aligned [[essential projects\|encyclopedia project]] using the [[wikitext standard]] pioneered by [[mediawiki]] and now better implemented in [[GetWiki]]. It appears to be an aspect of the [[Wikinfo]] project.

	We might consider these to be the best prototype yet of the future [[Development Wiki]]; It is certainly going to attract like-minded people. The odds of a typical [[Recyclopedia contributor]] becoming a [[Consumerium contributor]] are likely much higher than the odds of a [[Wikipedia]], [[Metaweb]] or [[Disinfopedia]] contributor doing so. It seems that it is devoted to presenting a negotiated [[consensus]] between [[Reds]] and [[Greens]] and various [[anarchist]] views.		We might consider these to be the best prototype yet of the future [[Development Wiki]]; It is certainly going to attract like-minded people. The odds of a typical [[Recyclopedia contributor]] becoming a [[Consumerium contributor]] are likely much higher than the odds of a [[Wikipedia]], [[Metaweb]] or [[Disinfopedia]] contributor doing so. It seems that it is devoted to presenting a negotiated [[consensus]] between [[Reds]] and [[Greens]] and various [[anarchist]] views.

	''Accordingly, if a lot of these users come over we may need to recruit some [[Blues]] or [[Pinks]] to balance these rather hardcore views. One problem at a time.''		''Accordingly, if a lot of these users come over we may need to recruit some [[Blues]] or [[Pinks]] to balance these rather hardcore views. One problem at a time.''

142.177.92.162 at 20:45, 8 March 2004

2004-03-08T20:45:58Z

New page

'''Recyclopedia''' (at [http://www.recyclopedia.info recyclopedia.info] is probably the most closely aligned [[essential projects|encyclopedia project]] using the [[wikitext standard]] pioneered by [[mediawiki]] and now better implemented in [[GetWiki]]. It appears to be an aspect of the [[Wikinfo]] project.

We might consider these to be the best prototype yet of the future [[Development Wiki]]; It is certainly going to attract like-minded people. The odds of a typical [[Recyclopedia contributor]] becoming a [[Consumerium contributor]] are likely much higher than the odds of a [[Wikipedia]], [[Metaweb]] or [[Disinfopedia]] contributor doing so. It seems that it is devoted to presenting a negotiated [[consensus]] between [[Reds]] and [[Greens]] and various [[anarchist]] views.

''Accordingly, if a lot of these users come over we may need to recruit some [[Blues]] or [[Pinks]] to balance these rather hardcore views. One problem at a time.''