<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://develop.consumerium.org/w/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Pipe_trick</id>
	<title>Pipe trick - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://develop.consumerium.org/w/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Pipe_trick"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://develop.consumerium.org/w/index.php?title=Pipe_trick&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-05-04T14:18:11Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.43.6</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://develop.consumerium.org/w/index.php?title=Pipe_trick&amp;diff=14463&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>142.177.109.50: why it&#039;s not a real good idea, augmenting arguments in anchor text</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://develop.consumerium.org/w/index.php?title=Pipe_trick&amp;diff=14463&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2004-07-24T17:40:01Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;why it&amp;#039;s not a real good idea, augmenting arguments in &lt;a href=&quot;/wiki/Anchor_text&quot; title=&quot;Anchor text&quot;&gt;anchor text&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;A [[wikitext]] &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;pipe trick&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; is to change the [[anchor text]] to be different from the [[page name]].  It is used often when someone wishes to ascribe meaning or implication to a page that is specific to some [[faction]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Normally, it is better to create a [[redirect]] so that the relative use of that phrase or implication is easy to track with [[what links here]], and so that anyone who strongly disagrees can easily expand the redirect to a full page explaining the various perspectives on it.  This also discourages whole sale rewriting of a more general page.  For example, if someone wishes to advocate a [[teleological]] approach to change based on [[rules]] and such, rather than an [[ontological]] approach based on [[glossary]] [[consensus]], it would be better for them to write an article in the &amp;quot;[[teleological]]&amp;quot; space than it would be to have them heavily edit [[ontology]] from their own [[POV]].&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>142.177.109.50</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>