Outing - Revision history

9-1-1: what if already-outed?

2005-02-22T20:15:19Z

what if already-outed?

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:15, 22 February 2005
Line 1:		Line 1:
	'''Outing''' is the revealing of the name attached to someone's body, or any information that can be used to track them down and do [[bodily harm]] to them. It is the most basic [[privacy]] concern that we can have regarding [[Consumerium Services]]. ~~Names~~ should ~~never be attached if it can be avoided~~, and [[reputation]] should be managed by [[faction]]s to avoid relying on it too directly~~, which creates most of the temptations for outing in a [[large public wiki]]~~.		'''Outing''' is the revealing of the name attached to someone's body, or any information that can be used to track them down and do [[bodily harm]] to them. It is the most basic [[privacy]] concern that we can have regarding [[Consumerium Services]]. Any service purporting to espouse [[anonymity]] should avoid outing its contributors, and [[reputation]] should be managed by [[faction]]s to avoid relying on body names too directly.

	It is a grave concern of the [[Consumerium Governance Organization]]. A good policy would be that no information can be revealed and attached to [[anonymous contributor]]s outside some process that examines only actual threats of bodily harm to other contributors, and to a degree that would stand up at least under [[international law]]. After all, comments made here may result in a risk to someone's life due to [[ruling party]] activity or revenge from those they are saying negative things about, true or not. We don't want to help that happen, instead we would prefer the [[political virtues]] are applied very consistently.		It is a grave concern of the [[Consumerium Governance Organization]]. A good policy would be that no information can be revealed and attached to [[anonymous contributor]]s outside some process that examines only actual threats of bodily harm to other contributors, and to a degree that would stand up at least under [[international law]]. After all, comments made here may result in a risk to someone's life due to [[ruling party]] activity or revenge from those they are saying negative things about, true or not. We don't want to help that happen, instead we would prefer the [[political virtues]] are applied very consistently.

	[[Pinks]] in particular take outing extremely seriously - some factions in the gay community have relatively strict and brutal rules for dealing with those who "out" others on an involuntary basis: whatever happens to the person who is outed, will happen to the person who outs them, period. So if someone loses a job because someone else decided to reveal they were gay involuntarily, then, the faction will make sure that s/he who revealed them also loses their job etc.		[[Pinks]] in particular take outing extremely seriously - some factions in the gay community have relatively strict and brutal rules for dealing with those who "out" others on an involuntary basis: whatever happens to the person who is outed, will happen to the person who outs them, period. So if someone loses a job because someone else decided to reveal they were gay involuntarily, then, the faction will make sure that s/he who revealed them also loses their job etc.

142.177.81.103 at 19:57, 25 November 2003

2003-11-25T19:57:13Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:57, 25 November 2003
Line 1:		Line 1:
	'''Outing''' is the revealing of the name attached to someone's body, or any information that can be used to track them down and do [[bodily harm]] to them.		'''Outing''' is the revealing of the name attached to someone's body, or any information that can be used to track them down and do [[bodily harm]] to them. It is the most basic [[privacy]] concern that we can have regarding [[Consumerium Services]]. Names should never be attached if it can be avoided, and [[reputation]] should be managed by [[faction]]s to avoid relying on it too directly, which creates most of the temptations for outing in a [[large public wiki]].

	It is a grave concern of the [[Consumerium Governance Organization]]. A good policy would be that no information can be revealed and attached to [[anonymous contributor]]s outside some process that examines only actual threats of bodily harm to other contributors, and to a degree that would stand up at least under [[international law]]. After all, comments made here may result in a risk to someone's life due to [[ruling party]] activity or revenge from those they are saying negative things about, true or not. We don't want to help that happen, instead we would prefer the [[political virtues]] are applied very consistently.		It is a grave concern of the [[Consumerium Governance Organization]]. A good policy would be that no information can be revealed and attached to [[anonymous contributor]]s outside some process that examines only actual threats of bodily harm to other contributors, and to a degree that would stand up at least under [[international law]]. After all, comments made here may result in a risk to someone's life due to [[ruling party]] activity or revenge from those they are saying negative things about, true or not. We don't want to help that happen, instead we would prefer the [[political virtues]] are applied very consistently.

	[[Pinks]] in particular take outing extremely seriously - some factions in the gay community have relatively strict and brutal rules for dealing with those who "out" others on an involuntary basis: whatever happens to the person who is outed, will happen to the person who outs them, period. So if someone loses a job because someone else decided to reveal they were gay involuntarily, then, the faction will make sure that s/he who revealed them also loses their job etc.		[[Pinks]] in particular take outing extremely seriously - some factions in the gay community have relatively strict and brutal rules for dealing with those who "out" others on an involuntary basis: whatever happens to the person who is outed, will happen to the person who outs them, period. So if someone loses a job because someone else decided to reveal they were gay involuntarily, then, the faction will make sure that s/he who revealed them also loses their job etc.

142.177.81.103 at 19:55, 25 November 2003

2003-11-25T19:55:33Z

New page

'''Outing''' is the revealing of the name attached to someone's body, or any information that can be used to track them down and do [[bodily harm]] to them.

It is a grave concern of the [[Consumerium Governance Organization]]. A good policy would be that no information can be revealed and attached to [[anonymous contributor]]s outside some process that examines only actual threats of bodily harm to other contributors, and to a degree that would stand up at least under [[international law]]. After all, comments made here may result in a risk to someone's life due to [[ruling party]] activity or revenge from those they are saying negative things about, true or not. We don't want to help that happen, instead we would prefer the [[political virtues]] are applied very consistently.

[[Pinks]] in particular take outing extremely seriously - some factions in the gay community have relatively strict and brutal rules for dealing with those who "out" others on an involuntary basis: whatever happens to the person who is outed, will happen to the person who outs them, period. So if someone loses a job because someone else decided to reveal they were gay involuntarily, then, the faction will make sure that s/he who revealed them also loses their job etc.