One wiki model - Revision history

Jukeboksi: Text replacement - "Anarchopedia" to "Anarcopedia"

2021-04-12T13:59:39Z

Text replacement - "Anarchopedia" to "Anarcopedia"

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:59, 12 April 2021
Line 5:		Line 5:
	The [[Wikipedia]] has used separate [[namespace]]s within one wiki to address most operational day to day problems, with such pages as [[w:Wikipedia:Votes_for_deletion]] and [[w:Wikipedia:Troll]] and [[w:Wikipedia:Vandalism_in_progress]] being part of the "Wikipedia:" namespace. However it retains separate [[m:\|meta]] wikis and others to address different issues, like [[Simple English Wikipedia]] to address simpler [[vocabulary]] needs for certain audiences.		The [[Wikipedia]] has used separate [[namespace]]s within one wiki to address most operational day to day problems, with such pages as [[w:Wikipedia:Votes_for_deletion]] and [[w:Wikipedia:Troll]] and [[w:Wikipedia:Vandalism_in_progress]] being part of the "Wikipedia:" namespace. However it retains separate [[m:\|meta]] wikis and others to address different issues, like [[Simple English Wikipedia]] to address simpler [[vocabulary]] needs for certain audiences.

	The [[~~Anarchopedia~~]] eliminates sysop monopoly on the ability to [[undelete page]]s and so there are no controls on reading. This is the most open model most compatible with [[free software]] and [[open source]] [[mindset]]s. It remains to be seen if it can resolve various problems with language & power.		The [[Anarcopedia]] eliminates sysop monopoly on the ability to [[undelete page]]s and so there are no controls on reading. This is the most open model most compatible with [[free software]] and [[open source]] [[mindset]]s. It remains to be seen if it can resolve various problems with language & power.

Jukeboksi: mv confusing paragraph half about wikipedia practices to talk-page

2005-01-25T15:02:18Z

mv confusing paragraph half about wikipedia practices to talk-page

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:02, 25 January 2005
Line 3:		Line 3:
	For instance the [[Green Party of Canada]] [http://greenparty.ca/lp at greenparty.ca/lp] implements its [[Living Platform]] [[wiki-based policy development]] and [[Living Agenda]] [[wiki-based governance]] projects with a single [[tikiwiki]], using varying [[user permission]]s and [[user group]]s. This is an experiment and it's not clear it will work out.		For instance the [[Green Party of Canada]] [http://greenparty.ca/lp at greenparty.ca/lp] implements its [[Living Platform]] [[wiki-based policy development]] and [[Living Agenda]] [[wiki-based governance]] projects with a single [[tikiwiki]], using varying [[user permission]]s and [[user group]]s. This is an experiment and it's not clear it will work out.

	The [[Wikipedia]] has used separate [[namespace]]s within one wiki to address most operational day to day problems, with such pages as [[w:Wikipedia:Votes_for_deletion]] and [[w:Wikipedia:Troll]] and [[w:Wikipedia:Vandalism_in_progress]] being part of the "Wikipedia:" namespace. However it retains separate [[m:\|meta]] wikis and others to address different issues, like [[Simple English Wikipedia]] to address simpler [[vocabulary]] needs for certain audiences. So it is not a pure '''one wiki model''' but has tried to keep as much as possible in the main Wikipedia space. What's more it does so with few [[user permission]]s applying to reading (only the ability to [[delete page]]s is a limit on what can be read), and a few more on writing - a [[sysop]] can [[protect page]]s or [[revert page]]s.		The [[Wikipedia]] has used separate [[namespace]]s within one wiki to address most operational day to day problems, with such pages as [[w:Wikipedia:Votes_for_deletion]] and [[w:Wikipedia:Troll]] and [[w:Wikipedia:Vandalism_in_progress]] being part of the "Wikipedia:" namespace. However it retains separate [[m:\|meta]] wikis and others to address different issues, like [[Simple English Wikipedia]] to address simpler [[vocabulary]] needs for certain audiences.

	The [[Anarchopedia]] eliminates sysop monopoly on the ability to [[undelete page]]s and so there are no controls on reading. This is the most open model most compatible with [[free software]] and [[open source]] [[mindset]]s. It remains to be seen if it can resolve various problems with language & power.		The [[Anarchopedia]] eliminates sysop monopoly on the ability to [[undelete page]]s and so there are no controls on reading. This is the most open model most compatible with [[free software]] and [[open source]] [[mindset]]s. It remains to be seen if it can resolve various problems with language & power.

142.177.10.21 at 14:53, 24 January 2005

2005-01-24T14:53:53Z

New page

A '''one wiki model''' has been applied in some [[large public wiki]]s that address very complex problems in [[politics]] and [[governance]]. Such a model has been proposed to unify the [[Consumerium Wikis]] presently proposed. Real life examples:

For instance the [[Green Party of Canada]] [http://greenparty.ca/lp at greenparty.ca/lp] implements its [[Living Platform]] [[wiki-based policy development]] and [[Living Agenda]] [[wiki-based governance]] projects with a single [[tikiwiki]], using varying [[user permission]]s and [[user group]]s. This is an experiment and it's not clear it will work out.

The [[Wikipedia]] has used separate [[namespace]]s within one wiki to address most operational day to day problems, with such pages as [[w:Wikipedia:Votes_for_deletion]] and [[w:Wikipedia:Troll]] and [[w:Wikipedia:Vandalism_in_progress]] being part of the "Wikipedia:" namespace. However it retains separate [[m:|meta]] wikis and others to address different issues, like [[Simple English Wikipedia]] to address simpler [[vocabulary]] needs for certain audiences. So it is not a pure '''one wiki model''' but has tried to keep as much as possible in the main Wikipedia space. What's more it does so with few [[user permission]]s applying to reading (only the ability to [[delete page]]s is a limit on what can be read), and a few more on writing - a [[sysop]] can [[protect page]]s or [[revert page]]s.

The [[Anarchopedia]] eliminates sysop monopoly on the ability to [[undelete page]]s and so there are no controls on reading. This is the most open model most compatible with [[free software]] and [[open source]] [[mindset]]s. It remains to be seen if it can resolve various problems with language & power.