Large public wiki - Revision history

Jukeboksi: Category:Wiki governance

2005-05-29T20:24:29Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:24, 29 May 2005
Line 1:		Line 1:
			[[Category:Wiki governance]]
	A '''large public wiki''' like [[Wikipedia]] or the [[Consumerium]] [[Content Wiki]] is going to have special problems managing a whole [[political spectrum]] of [[Consumerium:Contributor\|contributors]] who see [[political choice]] and "[[hard security\|hard security constraints]]" in a great variety of quite different ways.		A '''large public wiki''' like [[Wikipedia]] or the [[Consumerium]] [[Content Wiki]] is going to have special problems managing a whole [[political spectrum]] of [[Consumerium:Contributor\|contributors]] who see [[political choice]] and "[[hard security\|hard security constraints]]" in a great variety of quite different ways.

Jukeboksi: fix linking

2004-03-08T16:06:38Z

fix linking

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:06, 8 March 2004
Line 1:		Line 1:
	A '''large public wiki''' like [[Wikipedia]] or the [[Consumerium]] [[Content Wiki]] is going to have special problems managing a whole [[political spectrum]] of [[Consumerium:Contributor\|contributors]] who see [[political choice]] and "hard constraints" in a great variety of quite different ways.		A '''large public wiki''' like [[Wikipedia]] or the [[Consumerium]] [[Content Wiki]] is going to have special problems managing a whole [[political spectrum]] of [[Consumerium:Contributor\|contributors]] who see [[political choice]] and "[[hard security\|hard security constraints]]" in a great variety of quite different ways.

	One issue in selecting [[wiki code]] is which group of [[wiki end ~~user]]s~~ are going to be inclined to contribute, simply because they know that user interface. For instance, using [[MediaWiki]] as we do in the [[~~R&D~~ wiki]] is likely to attract [[Wikipedia]] authors, [[sysop]]s, etc., which may be good for some things and bad for others.		One issue in selecting [[wiki code]] is which group of wiki end users are going to be inclined to contribute, simply because they know that user interface. For instance, using [[MediaWiki]] as we do in the [[Development wiki]] is likely to attract [[Wikipedia]] authors, [[sysop]]s, etc., which may be [[Sysop\|good]] for some things and [[Sysop vandalism\|bad]] for others.

	The [[sociology]] and [[power structure]] of large public wikis has not been very closely studied. Doing so is a key responsibility of the [[Consumerium Governance Organization]]. It probably should begin with examination of the [[m:faction]], [[m:governance]], [[m:power structure]] and [[m:regime change]] issues on the Meta-Wikipedia, since they've had many problems we haven't yet.		The [[w:sociology\|sociology]] and [[power structure]] of large public wikis has not been very closely studied. Doing so is a key responsibility of the [[Consumerium Governance Organization]]. It probably should begin with examination of the [[m:faction]], [[m:governance]], [[m:power structure]] and [[m:regime change]] issues on the Meta-Wikipedia, since they've had many problems we haven't yet.

142.177.81.103: tpo and copyedit

2003-11-25T17:46:02Z

tpo and copyedit

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:46, 25 November 2003
Line 3:		Line 3:
	One issue in selecting [[wiki code]] is which group of [[wiki end user]]s are going to be inclined to contribute, simply because they know that user interface. For instance, using [[MediaWiki]] as we do in the [[R&D wiki]] is likely to attract [[Wikipedia]] authors, [[sysop]]s, etc., which may be good for some things and bad for others.		One issue in selecting [[wiki code]] is which group of [[wiki end user]]s are going to be inclined to contribute, simply because they know that user interface. For instance, using [[MediaWiki]] as we do in the [[R&D wiki]] is likely to attract [[Wikipedia]] authors, [[sysop]]s, etc., which may be good for some things and bad for others.

	The [[sociology]] and [[power structure]] of large public wikis has not been very closely studied. Doing so is a key responsibility of the [[Consumerium Governance Organization]]. It probably should begin with examination of the [[m:faction]], [[m:governance]], [[m:power structure]] and [[w:regime change]] issues on the Meta-Wikipedia.		The [[sociology]] and [[power structure]] of large public wikis has not been very closely studied. Doing so is a key responsibility of the [[Consumerium Governance Organization]]. It probably should begin with examination of the [[m:faction]], [[m:governance]], [[m:power structure]] and [[m:regime change]] issues on the Meta-Wikipedia, since they've had many problems we haven't yet.

142.177.81.103: major issues with these, to anticipate problems in the Content Wiki

2003-11-25T17:44:51Z

major issues with these, to anticipate problems in the Content Wiki

New page

A '''large public wiki''' like [[Wikipedia]] or the [[Consumerium]] [[Content Wiki]] is going to have special problems managing a whole [[political spectrum]] of [[Consumerium:Contributor|contributors]] who see [[political choice]] and "hard constraints" in a great variety of quite different ways.

One issue in selecting [[wiki code]] is which group of [[wiki end user]]s are going to be inclined to contribute, simply because they know that user interface. For instance, using [[MediaWiki]] as we do in the [[R&D wiki]] is likely to attract [[Wikipedia]] authors, [[sysop]]s, etc., which may be good for some things and bad for others.

The [[sociology]] and [[power structure]] of large public wikis has not been very closely studied. Doing so is a key responsibility of the [[Consumerium Governance Organization]]. It probably should begin with examination of the [[m:faction]], [[m:governance]], [[m:power structure]] and [[w:regime change]] issues on the Meta-Wikipedia.