Integrity - Revision history

Jukeboksi: typo/grammar

2003-05-07T02:15:29Z

typo/grammar

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:15, 7 May 2003
Line 2:		Line 2:

	[[Consumerium]] can expect to face at least the following challenges to its integrity:		[[Consumerium]] can expect to face at least the following challenges to its integrity:
	*[[trolls]] who seem ~~far~~ to be happy but might at any time bite us on the leg		*[[trolls]] who seem to be happy but might at any time bite us on the leg
	*accusations of [[m:bias\|bias]] and [http://disinfopedia.org/wiki.phtml?title=systemic_bias systemic bias]		*accusations of [[m:bias\|bias]] and [http://disinfopedia.org/wiki.phtml?title=systemic_bias systemic bias]
	*plain [[m:liars \|liars]] especially those who hide evidence of their lies		*plain [[m:liars \|liars]] especially those who hide evidence of their lies

142.177.104.235 at 01:57, 7 May 2003

2003-05-07T01:57:24Z

142.177.103.57: typo

2003-05-06T04:34:51Z

typo

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:34, 6 May 2003
Line 11:		Line 11:
	*[http://disinfopedia.org/wiki.phtml?title=propaganda propaganda] and well-meaning [http://disinfopedia.org/wiki.phtml?title=propaganda_techniques propaganda techniques] that discredit us		*[http://disinfopedia.org/wiki.phtml?title=propaganda propaganda] and well-meaning [http://disinfopedia.org/wiki.phtml?title=propaganda_techniques propaganda techniques] that discredit us
	*claims that the [[glossary]] is not a [[m:natural point of view\|valid, natural, point of view]]		*claims that the [[glossary]] is not a [[m:natural point of view\|valid, natural, point of view]]
	*accusations that its use of [[electronics]] just leads to more [[e-waste]], that is, it is another [[geek]] site with only purpose being silly		*accusations that its use of [[electronics]] just leads to more [[e-waste]], that is, it is another [[geek]] site with only purpose being silly [http://disinfopedia.org/wiki.phtml?title=virtual_community virtual community], that is, friends for geeks who deserve none, and doesn't do any real [[good]] or stop any real [[evil]]
	[http://disinfopedia.org/wiki.phtml?title=virtual_community virtual community], that is, friends for geeks who deserve none, and doesn't do any real [[good]] or stop any real [[evil]]

	How it deals with these challenges will determine if it is trusted for anything else.		How it deals with these challenges will determine if it is trusted for anything else.

142.177.103.57 at 04:33, 6 May 2003

2003-05-06T04:33:10Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:33, 6 May 2003
Line 1:		Line 1:
	'''Integrity''' is like [[trust]]: if you have about it, it isn't there. So like [[distrust]], which is predictable lack of trust, e.g. [[checks and balances]], there is [[disintegrity]], consistent testing to find lack of integrity.		'''Integrity''' is like [[trust]]: if you have about it, it isn't there. So like [[distrust]], which is predictable lack of trust, e.g. [[checks and balances]], there is [[disintegrity]], consistent testing to find lack of integrity.

	[[Consumerium]] can expect to face following challenges to its integrity:		[[Consumerium]] can expect to face at least the following challenges to its integrity:
	*accusations of [[m:bias\|bias]]		*accusations of [[m:bias\|bias]] and [http://disinfopedia.org/wiki.phtml?title=systemic_bias systemic bias]
	*plain [[m:liars \|liars]]		*plain [[m:liars \|liars]] especially those who hide evidence of their lies
	*[[m:Internet Authority Disease\|Internet Authority Disease]] ([[misintegrity]])		*[[m:Internet Authority Disease\|Internet Authority Disease]] ([[misintegrity]])
	**[http://disinfopedia.org/wiki.phtml?title=little_tin_god_sysop bad sysops]		**[http://disinfopedia.org/wiki.phtml?title=little_tin_god_sysop bad sysops] (those who cannot rise to [[m:troll\|troll]])
	**[[w:precedent\|precedent]]		**[[w:precedent\|precedent]] - using one bad decision to justify the next one
	**[[w:groupthink\|groupthink]]		**[[w:groupthink\|groupthink]] - trying to agree with each other, sysop, leader
	*[http://disinfopedia.org/wiki.phtml?title=point_of_view POV problems]		*[http://disinfopedia.org/wiki.phtml?title=point_of_view POV problems] like silly [http://disinfopedia.org/wiki.phtml?title=Wikipedia_neutral_point_of_view Wikipedia neutral point of view]
	*[http://disinfopedia.org/wiki.phtml?title=propaganda propaganda]		*[http://disinfopedia.org/wiki.phtml?title=propaganda propaganda] and well-meaning [http://disinfopedia.org/wiki.phtml?title=propaganda_techniques propaganda techniques] that discredit us
			*claims that the [[glossary]] is not a [[m:natural point of view\|valid, natural, point of view]]
			*accusations that its use of [[electronics]] just leads to more [[e-waste]], that is, it is another [[geek]] site with only purpose being silly
			[http://disinfopedia.org/wiki.phtml?title=virtual_community virtual community], that is, friends for geeks who deserve none, and doesn't do any real [[good]] or stop any real [[evil]]

	How it deals with these will determine if it is trusted for anything else.		How it deals with these challenges will determine if it is trusted for anything else.

142.177.103.57 at 01:59, 6 May 2003

2003-05-06T01:59:26Z

New page

'''Integrity''' is like [[trust]]: if you have about it, it isn't there. So like [[distrust]], which is predictable lack of trust, e.g. [[checks and balances]], there is [[disintegrity]], consistent testing to find lack of integrity.

[[Consumerium]] can expect to face following challenges to its integrity:
*accusations of [[m:bias|bias]]
*plain [[m:liars |liars]]
*[[m:Internet Authority Disease|Internet Authority Disease]] ([[misintegrity]])
**[http://disinfopedia.org/wiki.phtml?title=little_tin_god_sysop bad sysops]
**[[w:precedent|precedent]]
**[[w:groupthink|groupthink]]
*[http://disinfopedia.org/wiki.phtml?title=point_of_view POV problems]
*[http://disinfopedia.org/wiki.phtml?title=propaganda propaganda]

How it deals with these will determine if it is trusted for anything else.

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:57, 7 May 2003
Line 1:		Line 1:
	'''Integrity''' is like [[trust]]: if you have about it, it isn't there. So like [[distrust]], which is predictable lack of trust, e.g. [[checks and balances]], there is [[disintegrity]], consistent testing to find lack of integrity.		'''Integrity''' is like [[trust]]: if you have to talk about it, it isn't there. So like [[distrust]], which is predictable lack of trust, e.g. [[checks and balances]], there is [[disintegrity]], consistent testing to find lack of integrity.

	[[Consumerium]] can expect to face at least the following challenges to its integrity:		[[Consumerium]] can expect to face at least the following challenges to its integrity:
			*[[trolls]] who seem far to be happy but might at any time bite us on the leg
	*accusations of [[m:bias\|bias]] and [http://disinfopedia.org/wiki.phtml?title=systemic_bias systemic bias]		*accusations of [[m:bias\|bias]] and [http://disinfopedia.org/wiki.phtml?title=systemic_bias systemic bias]
	*plain [[m:liars \|liars]] especially those who hide evidence of their lies		*plain [[m:liars \|liars]] especially those who hide evidence of their lies
	*[[m:Internet Authority Disease\|Internet Authority Disease]] ([[misintegrity]])		*[[m:Internet Authority Disease\|Internet Authority Disease]] ([[misintegrity]])
	**[http://disinfopedia.org/wiki.phtml?title=little_tin_god_sysop bad sysops] (those who cannot rise to [[m:troll\|troll]])		**[http://disinfopedia.org/wiki.phtml?title=little_tin_god_sysop bad sysops] (those who cannot rise to [[m:troll\|the good type of troll]])
	**[[w:precedent\|precedent]] - using one bad decision to justify the next one		**[[w:precedent\|precedent]] - using one bad decision to justify the next one
	**[[w:groupthink\|groupthink]] - trying to agree with each other, sysop, leader		**[[w:groupthink\|groupthink]] - trying to agree with each other, sysop, leader
	*[http://disinfopedia.org/wiki.phtml?title=point_of_view POV problems] like silly [http://disinfopedia.org/wiki.phtml?title=Wikipedia_neutral_point_of_view Wikipedia neutral point of view]		*[http://disinfopedia.org/wiki.phtml?title=point_of_view POV problems] like silly [http://disinfopedia.org/wiki.phtml?title=Wikipedia_neutral_point_of_view Wikipedia neutral point of view]
	*[http://disinfopedia.org/wiki.phtml?title=propaganda propaganda] and well-meaning [http://disinfopedia.org/wiki.phtml?title=propaganda_techniques propaganda techniques] that discredit us		*[http://disinfopedia.org/wiki.phtml?title=propaganda propaganda] and well-meaning [http://disinfopedia.org/wiki.phtml?title=propaganda_techniques propaganda techniques] that discredit us
			*accusations that its use of [[electronics]] just leads to more [[e-waste]], that is, it is another [[geek]] site with only purpose being silly [http://disinfopedia.org/wiki.phtml?title=virtual_community virtual community], that is, friends for geeks who deserve none, and doesn't do any real [[good]] or stop any real [[evil]]
	*claims that the [[glossary]] is not a [[m:natural point of view\|valid, natural, point of view]]		*claims that the [[glossary]] is not a [[m:natural point of view\|valid, natural, point of view]]
	*accusations that its use of [[electronics]] just leads to more [[e-waste]], that is, it is another [[geek]] site with only purpose being silly [http://disinfopedia.org/wiki.phtml?title=virtual_community virtual community], that is, friends for geeks who deserve none, and doesn't do any real [[good]] or stop any real [[evil]]

	How it deals with these challenges will determine if it is trusted for anything else.		How it deals with these challenges will determine if it is trusted for anything else. So far, [[trolls]] say, it does better than any other wikipedia3 site!