Instructional capital - Revision history

142.177.78.192: audit only way to ensurintegrity

2003-06-15T06:05:49Z

audit only way to ensurintegrity

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:05, 15 June 2003
Line 1:		Line 1:
	'''[[w:Instructional capital\|Instructional capital]]''' is agreements that can be used to guide or limit or restrict action by [[individual capital]] (people, if the instructions are written in natural language) or [[infrastructural capital]] (equipment, if the instructions are software). It cannot generally make either individuals or infrastructure do what they are not trained or designed to do, but, it can help prevent them from doing most stupid, destructive and dangerous things.		'''[[w:Instructional capital\|Instructional capital]]''' is agreements that can be used to guide or limit or restrict action by [[individual capital]] (people, if the instructions are written in natural language) or [[infrastructural capital]] (equipment, if the instructions are software). It cannot generally make either individuals or infrastructure do what they are not trained or designed to do, but, it can help prevent them from doing most stupid, destructive and dangerous things.

	When people begin to trust instructions, they tend to associate [[social capital]] with them, as symbolized by a [[brand]], [[flag]] or [[label]]. This is usually opens up a possibility for those with power to start cheating and creating bad instructions that can no longer be trusted, but the good reputation of the brand, flag or label protects them from being caught for longer than would be the case without the [[symbol]] that is associated with good reputation (track record of good instructional capital and complying with the instructions).		When people begin to trust instructions, they tend to associate [[social capital]] with them, as symbolized by a [[brand]], [[flag]] or [[label]]. This is usually opens up a possibility for those with power to start cheating and creating bad instructions that can no longer be trusted, but the good reputation of the brand, flag or label protects them from being caught for longer than would be the case without the [[symbol]] that is associated with good reputation (track record of good instructional capital and complying with the instructions - integrity which is only proven by an [[audit]] by [[trusted auditor]]s).

Jukeboksi: minor rephrasing, still some trolliness in this

2003-06-14T15:13:50Z

minor rephrasing, still some trolliness in this

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:13, 14 June 2003
Line 1:		Line 1:
	'''[[w:Instructional capital\|Instructional capital]]''' is agreements that can be used to guide or limit or restrict action by [[individual capital]] (people, if the instructions are written in natural language) or [[infrastructural capital]] (equipment, if the instructions are software). It cannot generally make either individuals or infrastructure do what they are not trained or designed to do, but, it can help prevent them from doing most stupid, destructive and dangerous things.		'''[[w:Instructional capital\|Instructional capital]]''' is agreements that can be used to guide or limit or restrict action by [[individual capital]] (people, if the instructions are written in natural language) or [[infrastructural capital]] (equipment, if the instructions are software). It cannot generally make either individuals or infrastructure do what they are not trained or designed to do, but, it can help prevent them from doing most stupid, destructive and dangerous things.

	When people begin to trust instructions, they tend to associate [[social capital]] with them, as symbolized by a [[brand]], [[flag]] or [[label]]. This is usually opens up a possibility for those with power to start cheating and creating bad instructions that can no longer be trusted, but the good reputation of the brand, flag or label protects them from being caught for longer than would be the case without the [[symbol]] that is associated with good reputation (track record of good instructional capital and ~~proper execution of~~ instructions).		When people begin to trust instructions, they tend to associate [[social capital]] with them, as symbolized by a [[brand]], [[flag]] or [[label]]. This is usually opens up a possibility for those with power to start cheating and creating bad instructions that can no longer be trusted, but the good reputation of the brand, flag or label protects them from being caught for longer than would be the case without the [[symbol]] that is associated with good reputation (track record of good instructional capital and complying with the instructions).

Jukeboksi: Fix some trollishness + fix a typo, but it still doesn't quite make sesne.

2003-06-14T01:56:08Z

Fix some trollishness + fix a typo, but it still doesn't quite make sesne.

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:56, 14 June 2003
Line 1:		Line 1:
	'''[[w:Instructional capital\|Instructional capital]]''' is ~~symbols~~ that can be used to guide or limit or restrict action by [[individual capital]] (people, if the ~~instrucons~~ are written in natural language) or [[infrastructural capital]] (equipment, if the instructions are software). It cannot generally make either individuals or infrastructure do what they are not trained or designed to do, but, it can help prevent them from doing most stupid and dangerous things.		'''[[w:Instructional capital\|Instructional capital]]''' is agreements that can be used to guide or limit or restrict action by [[individual capital]] (people, if the instructions are written in natural language) or [[infrastructural capital]] (equipment, if the instructions are software). It cannot generally make either individuals or infrastructure do what they are not trained or designed to do, but, it can help prevent them from doing most stupid, destructive and dangerous things.

	When people begin to trust instructions, they tend to associate [[social capital]] with them, as symbolized by a [[brand]], [[flag]] or [[label]]. This is usually a ~~signal~~ for those with power to start cheating and creating bad instructions that can no longer be trusted, but the good reputation of the brand, flag or label protects them from being caught for longer than would be the case without the reputation.		When people begin to trust instructions, they tend to associate [[social capital]] with them, as symbolized by a [[brand]], [[flag]] or [[label]]. This is usually opens up a possibility for those with power to start cheating and creating bad instructions that can no longer be trusted, but the good reputation of the brand, flag or label protects them from being caught for longer than would be the case without the [[symbol]] that is associated with good reputation (track record of good instructional capital and proper execution of instructions).

142.177.98.227 at 01:17, 14 June 2003

2003-06-14T01:17:47Z

New page

'''[[w:Instructional capital|Instructional capital]]''' is symbols that can be used to guide or limit or restrict action by [[individual capital]] (people, if the instrucons are written in natural language) or [[infrastructural capital]] (equipment, if the instructions are software). It cannot generally make either individuals or infrastructure do what they are not trained or designed to do, but, it can help prevent them from doing most stupid and dangerous things.

When people begin to trust instructions, they tend to associate [[social capital]] with them, as symbolized by a [[brand]], [[flag]] or [[label]]. This is usually a signal for those with power to start cheating and creating bad instructions that can no longer be trusted, but the good reputation of the brand, flag or label protects them from being caught for longer than would be the case without the reputation.