Institutional buying criteria - Revision history

142.177.112.157 at 00:58, 13 June 2005

2005-06-13T00:58:39Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:58, 13 June 2005
Line 6:		Line 6:

	*Many Institutional Buyers have mandatory public bidding rounds, either by law or by internal orders to try to ensure that corruption is kept as low as possible.		*Many Institutional Buyers have mandatory public bidding rounds, either by law or by internal orders to try to ensure that corruption is kept as low as possible.

			*Most have [[moral purchasing]] criteria for environmental and labour standards, especially if they have internal unions

	-------		-------

	''IMPORTANT: a [[faction]] applies a flexible set of such criteria that might vary the way a [[parametric license]] does - suggesting that a [[faction license]] should be parametrized to vary the way the criteria do. Such a license aggregates the [[individual buying criteria]] of those who trust the faction, and tries to apply them also to the conditions of sharing data in the [[Research Wiki]]. Done this way, all [[Distributed Consumerium]] [[wiki management]] is by contract between factions, just as the [[Consumerium maintenance]] of the [[healthy buying infrastructure]] would have to be. A whole [[healthy signal infrastructure]] could be managed ONLY by one method of expressing buying criteria, which would apply to infrastructure decisions too.''		''IMPORTANT: a [[faction]] applies a flexible set of such criteria that might vary the way a [[parametric license]] does - suggesting that a [[faction license]] should be parametrized to vary the way the criteria do. Such a license aggregates the [[individual buying criteria]] of those who trust the faction, and tries to apply them also to the conditions of sharing data in the [[Research Wiki]]. Done this way, all [[Distributed Consumerium]] [[wiki management]] is by contract between factions, just as the [[Consumerium maintenance]] of the [[healthy buying infrastructure]] would have to be. A whole [[healthy signal infrastructure]] could be managed ONLY by one method of expressing buying criteria, which would apply to infrastructure decisions too.''

142.177.99.8: reflexive infrastructure

2004-02-29T06:47:30Z

reflexive infrastructure

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:47, 29 February 2004
Line 1:		Line 1:
	'''Institutional buying criteria''' are those applied by any [[group entity]] (as opposed to [[individual buying criteria]]). Most [[government]], [[union]], [[political party]] and [[corporate]] buying actually already has such criteria, and usually they are stated in terms of [[standard label]]s, e.g. unions tend to insist on buying [[union made]] goods or at least [[no sweat]].		'''Institutional buying criteria''' are those applied by any [[group entity]] (as opposed to [[individual buying criteria]]). Most [[government]], [[union]], [[political party]] and [[corporate]] buying actually already has such criteria, and usually they are stated in terms of [[standard label]]s, e.g. unions tend to insist on buying [[union made]] goods or at least [[no sweat]].

	''IMPORTANT: a [[faction]] applies a flexible set of such criteria that might vary the way a [[parametric license]] does - suggesting that a [[faction license]] should be parametrized to vary the way the criteria do. Such a license aggregates the [[individual buying criteria]] of those who trust the faction, and tries to apply them also to the conditions of sharing data in the [[Research Wiki]].''

	Because any such criteria are required by an organization, and the individual spending doesn't make this decision, this is an ideal place to begin our work, and an ideal starting point for any [[Consumerium Credit]] type of scheme that would make it possible to actually ''track'' and ''forbid'' unauthorized buying.		Because any such criteria are required by an organization, and the individual spending doesn't make this decision, this is an ideal place to begin our work, and an ideal starting point for any [[Consumerium Credit]] type of scheme that would make it possible to actually ''track'' and ''forbid'' unauthorized buying.
Line 8:		Line 6:

	*Many Institutional Buyers have mandatory public bidding rounds, either by law or by internal orders to try to ensure that corruption is kept as low as possible.		*Many Institutional Buyers have mandatory public bidding rounds, either by law or by internal orders to try to ensure that corruption is kept as low as possible.

			-------

			''IMPORTANT: a [[faction]] applies a flexible set of such criteria that might vary the way a [[parametric license]] does - suggesting that a [[faction license]] should be parametrized to vary the way the criteria do. Such a license aggregates the [[individual buying criteria]] of those who trust the faction, and tries to apply them also to the conditions of sharing data in the [[Research Wiki]]. Done this way, all [[Distributed Consumerium]] [[wiki management]] is by contract between factions, just as the [[Consumerium maintenance]] of the [[healthy buying infrastructure]] would have to be. A whole [[healthy signal infrastructure]] could be managed ONLY by one method of expressing buying criteria, which would apply to infrastructure decisions too.''

142.177.99.8 at 06:43, 29 February 2004

2004-02-29T06:43:37Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:43, 29 February 2004
Line 1:		Line 1:
	'''Institutional buying criteria''' are those applied by any [[group entity]] (as opposed to [[individual buying criteria]]). Most [[government]], [[union]], [[political party]] and [[corporate]] buying actually already has such criteria, and usually they are stated in terms of [[standard label]]s, e.g. unions tend to insist on buying [[union made]] goods or at least [[no sweat]].		'''Institutional buying criteria''' are those applied by any [[group entity]] (as opposed to [[individual buying criteria]]). Most [[government]], [[union]], [[political party]] and [[corporate]] buying actually already has such criteria, and usually they are stated in terms of [[standard label]]s, e.g. unions tend to insist on buying [[union made]] goods or at least [[no sweat]].

			''IMPORTANT: a [[faction]] applies a flexible set of such criteria that might vary the way a [[parametric license]] does - suggesting that a [[faction license]] should be parametrized to vary the way the criteria do. Such a license aggregates the [[individual buying criteria]] of those who trust the faction, and tries to apply them also to the conditions of sharing data in the [[Research Wiki]].''

	Because any such criteria are required by an organization, and the individual spending doesn't make this decision, this is an ideal place to begin our work, and an ideal starting point for any [[Consumerium Credit]] type of scheme that would make it possible to actually ''track'' and ''forbid'' unauthorized buying.		Because any such criteria are required by an organization, and the individual spending doesn't make this decision, this is an ideal place to begin our work, and an ideal starting point for any [[Consumerium Credit]] type of scheme that would make it possible to actually ''track'' and ''forbid'' unauthorized buying.
Line 6:		Line 8:

	*Many Institutional Buyers have mandatory public bidding rounds, either by law or by internal orders to try to ensure that corruption is kept as low as possible.		*Many Institutional Buyers have mandatory public bidding rounds, either by law or by internal orders to try to ensure that corruption is kept as low as possible.
	~~----~~

Jukeboksi: + mandatory public bidding rounds

2003-11-26T22:11:17Z

+ mandatory public bidding rounds

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:11, 26 November 2003
Line 5:		Line 5:
	Because it is so strategic, we should list any such criteria we find right here:		Because it is so strategic, we should list any such criteria we find right here:

	~~----------~~----		*Many Institutional Buyers have mandatory public bidding rounds, either by law or by internal orders to try to ensure that corruption is kept as low as possible.
			----

142.177.103.109: strategic/central concern

2003-11-26T21:54:42Z

strategic/central concern

New page

'''Institutional buying criteria''' are those applied by any [[group entity]] (as opposed to [[individual buying criteria]]). Most [[government]], [[union]], [[political party]] and [[corporate]] buying actually already has such criteria, and usually they are stated in terms of [[standard label]]s, e.g. unions tend to insist on buying [[union made]] goods or at least [[no sweat]].

Because any such criteria are required by an organization, and the individual spending doesn't make this decision, this is an ideal place to begin our work, and an ideal starting point for any [[Consumerium Credit]] type of scheme that would make it possible to actually ''track'' and ''forbid'' unauthorized buying.

Because it is so strategic, we should list any such criteria we find right here:

--------------