Identifying people - Revision history

Jukeboksi: moving company stuff from here....

2003-04-29T18:55:17Z

moving company stuff from here....

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:55, 29 April 2003
Line 13:		Line 13:

	----		----
	==~~=On identifying companies=~~==		==See also:==

	[[~~Companies]] on the other hand should enjoy only minimal privacy. Basic approach is that~~ companies ~~are encouraged to register their identity within consumerium and their failure to do so might quickly result in that someone outside of the company registers the company into the system.~~		* [[Identifying companies]]

	In such a case the company is notified that someone has filed initial minimum data on the company and the company is given a reasonable timeframe to register themself. If they don't respond in time then a bit is set that this company did not register itself even though they had been offered the chance, which will not look good with the default [[UI]] settings --[[User:Juxo\|Juxo]]

Jukeboksi: :Good questions...

2003-04-27T08:40:24Z

:Good questions...

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:40, 27 April 2003
Line 2:		Line 2:

	A) Explicit consent from the person in question (recorded where? how? when?)		A) Explicit consent from the person in question (recorded where? how? when?)
			:Good questions. We must determine how to determine someone claiming to be someone is really that someone.

	or		or

142.177.94.33: six words: safe, done, evil, fair, ignore, forgive - MAKE A faction

2003-04-26T21:47:39Z

six words: safe, done, evil, fair, ignore, forgive - MAKE A faction

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:47, 26 April 2003
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Having identification data on someones person in the system without:		Having identification data on someones person in the system without:

	A) Explicit consent from the person in question		A) Explicit consent from the person in question (recorded where? how? when?)

	or		or
Line 8:		Line 8:

	is something I oppose up to the level of causing a [[w:fork\|fork]], which would be very unfortunate should it come to that. --[[User:Juxo\|Juxo]]		is something I oppose up to the level of causing a [[w:fork\|fork]], which would be very unfortunate should it come to that. --[[User:Juxo\|Juxo]]

			:We all view some of someone else's behaviour as [[amoral purchasing]], i.e. "evil". But we accept some [[political economy]] to limit those liabilities and tell us when something is "done". You do not need to agree what is "good" but to some degree you must agree what is "[[safe]]", "[[done]]", and "[[evil]]" to agree what is "[[fair]]". Because it is also good to [[ignore]] and [[forgive]]. So there must be a debate on all six of those words I think. Those who agree on when all six must be used can agree on anything else and form a sort of [[faction]] that cooperates to coordinate the data. Fair?

	----		----

Jukeboksi: identifying companies on the other hand...

2003-04-26T13:26:21Z

identifying companies on the other hand...

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:26, 26 April 2003
Line 7:		Line 7:
	B) The person being a [[publicly known person]] (eg. [[executive]]s ([[VP]], [[CEO]]...) that can be looked up by [[shareholder]]s or in the [[media]] or [[company register]]s, or [[shareholder]]s that can be looked up in [[stock exchange]] information systems or [[company register]]s or other people appearing in well known [[publication]]s ([[tv]], [[radio]], [[magazine]]s, [[news paper]]s or well established digital sources.)		B) The person being a [[publicly known person]] (eg. [[executive]]s ([[VP]], [[CEO]]...) that can be looked up by [[shareholder]]s or in the [[media]] or [[company register]]s, or [[shareholder]]s that can be looked up in [[stock exchange]] information systems or [[company register]]s or other people appearing in well known [[publication]]s ([[tv]], [[radio]], [[magazine]]s, [[news paper]]s or well established digital sources.)

	is something I oppose up to the level of causing a [[w:fork\|fork]]. --[[User:Juxo\|Juxo]] 15:~~11 Apr 25, 2003 (EEST)~~		is something I oppose up to the level of causing a [[w:fork\|fork]], which would be very unfortunate should it come to that. --[[User:Juxo\|Juxo]]

			----
			===On identifying companies===

			[[Companies]] on the other hand should enjoy only minimal privacy. Basic approach is that companies are encouraged to register their identity within consumerium and their failure to do so might quickly result in that someone outside of the company registers the company into the system.

			In such a case the company is notified that someone has filed initial minimum data on the company and the company is given a reasonable timeframe to register themself. If they don't respond in time then a bit is set that this company did not register itself even though they had been offered the chance, which will not look good with the default [[UI]] settings --[[User:Juxo\|Juxo]]

Jukeboksi: A clear stepdown from the ultimatum I wrote in Deleted nonsense. I still think that m:person_DTD is still totally unacceptable

2003-04-26T13:00:28Z

A clear stepdown from the ultimatum I wrote in Deleted nonsense. I still think that m:person_DTD is still totally unacceptable

New page

Having identification data on someones person in the system without:

A) Explicit consent from the person in question

or

B) The person being a [[publicly known person]] (eg. [[executive]]s ([[VP]], [[CEO]]...) that can be looked up by [[shareholder]]s or in the [[media]] or [[company register]]s, or [[shareholder]]s that can be looked up in [[stock exchange]] information systems or [[company register]]s or other people appearing in well known [[publication]]s ([[tv]], [[radio]], [[magazine]]s, [[news paper]]s or well established digital sources.)

is something I oppose up to the level of causing a [[w:fork|fork]]. --[[User:Juxo|Juxo]] 15:11 Apr 25, 2003 (EEST)