Green Documentation License - Revision history

142.177.82.78 at 10:05, 24 November 2003

2003-11-24T10:05:25Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:05, 24 November 2003
Line 1:		Line 1:
	A '''Green Documentation [[licenses\|License]]''' would presumably put some barriers in place to using documentation for ~~any~~ purposes that ~~violates~~ the [[six principles]] which all so-called [[~~w:Greens\|~~Greens]] believe in, at least according to the [[w:Global Green Charter\|Global Green Charter]]. There may also just be a simple set of restrictions that prevent its use for [[war]] and [[ecological devastation]]. At least, to the degree that any license can do that.		A '''Green Documentation [[licenses\|License]]''' would presumably put some barriers in place to turning contributed [[content]] into [[greewash]], or perhaps using documentation for non-[[Green purposes]] that violate the [[six principles]] which all so-called [[Greens]] believe in, at least according to the [[w:Global Green Charter\|Global Green Charter]]. There may also just be a simple set of restrictions that prevent its use for [[war]] and [[ecological devastation]]. At least, to the degree that any license can do that.

	While adding [[Invariant Section]]s (which are [[Secondary Section]]s) to the [[GNU FDL]] may warn against use for some purposes, it can't actually prevent such use.		While adding [[Invariant Section]]s (which are [[Secondary Section]]s) to the [[GNU FDL]] may warn against use for some purposes, it can't actually prevent such use.
Line 6:		Line 6:

	See also [[Green Software License]], [[Green Patent License]].		See also [[Green Software License]], [[Green Patent License]].

			The [[Consumerium License]] may rely on these licenses to cut some corruption, if the [[Governance Organization]] they use is ultimately compatible with ours.

142.177.77.69 at 05:11, 23 August 2003

2003-08-23T05:11:21Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:11, 23 August 2003
Line 1:		Line 1:
	A '''Green Documentation [[licenses\|License]]''' would presumably put some barriers in place to using documentation for any purposes that violates the [[six principles]] which all so-called [[w:Greens\|Greens]] believe in, at least according to the [[w:Global Green Charter\|Global Green Charter]]. There may also just be a simple set of restrictions that prevent its use for war and ecological devastation. At least, to the degree that any license can do that.		A '''Green Documentation [[licenses\|License]]''' would presumably put some barriers in place to using documentation for any purposes that violates the [[six principles]] which all so-called [[w:Greens\|Greens]] believe in, at least according to the [[w:Global Green Charter\|Global Green Charter]]. There may also just be a simple set of restrictions that prevent its use for [[war]] and [[ecological devastation]]. At least, to the degree that any license can do that.

			While adding [[Invariant Section]]s (which are [[Secondary Section]]s) to the [[GNU FDL]] may warn against use for some purposes, it can't actually prevent such use.

			A GDL is clearly not [[Free according to Debian]]. But of course, who cares?

	See also [[Green Software License]], [[Green Patent License]].		See also [[Green Software License]], [[Green Patent License]].

142.177.97.205 at 21:49, 15 August 2003

2003-08-15T21:49:25Z

New page

A '''Green Documentation [[licenses|License]]''' would presumably put some barriers in place to using documentation for any purposes that violates the [[six principles]] which all so-called [[w:Greens|Greens]] believe in, at least according to the [[w:Global Green Charter|Global Green Charter]]. There may also just be a simple set of restrictions that prevent its use for war and ecological devastation. At least, to the degree that any license can do that.

See also [[Green Software License]], [[Green Patent License]].