Free Software Foundation - Revision history

142.177.12.26 at 19:56, 9 April 2004

2004-04-09T19:56:49Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:56, 9 April 2004
Line 3:		Line 3:
	It is also sometimes called '''GNU''' after its original project, "GNU's Not Unix." It uses a gnu-head as its symbol. It is identified with [[Richard Stallman]], who is approximately as stubborn as any hoofed animal imaginable.		It is also sometimes called '''GNU''' after its original project, "GNU's Not Unix." It uses a gnu-head as its symbol. It is identified with [[Richard Stallman]], who is approximately as stubborn as any hoofed animal imaginable.

	The FSF wrote the [[GPL]] and [[GFDL]] and takes some responsibility for their enforcement, although it is often criticized for having no viable way to do this in a [[self-funding]] manner. Some believe they have done an inadequate job for instance of getting [[GFDL corpus access provider]]s to cooperate and integrate and annotate material consistently as the GFDL itself requires.		The FSF wrote the [[GPL]] and [[GFDL]] and takes some responsibility for their enforcement, although it is often criticized for having no viable way to do this in a [[self-funding]] manner. Some believe they have done an inadequate job for instance of getting [[GFDL corpus access provider]]s to cooperate and integrate and annotate material consistently as the GFDL itself requires ''- an issue of some interest to [[CGO]] especially re [[Research Wiki]] integration.''

	The [[open source]] and some [[consortia]] (like [[W3]] and [[Java]]) were both responses to issues with GPL, and other aspects of FSF's ideology and solutions. [[Creative Commons]] was likewise inspired by, but critical of, [[GFDL]]. ''See [[problems with free software and open source models]] for ~~other views on this~~.''		The [[open source]] and some [[consortia]] (like [[W3]] and [[Java]]) were both responses to issues with GPL, and other aspects of FSF's ideology and solutions. [[Creative Commons]] was likewise inspired by, but critical of, [[GFDL]]. ''See [[problems with free software and open source models]] for more.''

142.177.12.26 at 19:55, 9 April 2004

2004-04-09T19:55:35Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:55, 9 April 2004
Line 3:		Line 3:
	It is also sometimes called '''GNU''' after its original project, "GNU's Not Unix." It uses a gnu-head as its symbol. It is identified with [[Richard Stallman]], who is approximately as stubborn as any hoofed animal imaginable.		It is also sometimes called '''GNU''' after its original project, "GNU's Not Unix." It uses a gnu-head as its symbol. It is identified with [[Richard Stallman]], who is approximately as stubborn as any hoofed animal imaginable.

	The FSF wrote the [[GPL]] and [[GFDL]] and takes some responsibility for their enforcement, although it is often criticized for having no viable way to do this in a [[self-funding]] manner.		The FSF wrote the [[GPL]] and [[GFDL]] and takes some responsibility for their enforcement, although it is often criticized for having no viable way to do this in a [[self-funding]] manner. Some believe they have done an inadequate job for instance of getting [[GFDL corpus access provider]]s to cooperate and integrate and annotate material consistently as the GFDL itself requires.

	The [[open source]] and some [[consortia]] (like [[W3]] and [[Java]]) were both responses to issues with GPL, and other aspects of FSF's ideology and solutions. [[Creative Commons]] was likewise inspired by, but critical of, [[GFDL]]. ''See [[problems with free software and open source models]] for other views on this.''		The [[open source]] and some [[consortia]] (like [[W3]] and [[Java]]) were both responses to issues with GPL, and other aspects of FSF's ideology and solutions. [[Creative Commons]] was likewise inspired by, but critical of, [[GFDL]]. ''See [[problems with free software and open source models]] for other views on this.''

142.177.12.26 at 19:45, 9 April 2004

2004-04-09T19:45:14Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:45, 9 April 2004
Line 5:		Line 5:
	The FSF wrote the [[GPL]] and [[GFDL]] and takes some responsibility for their enforcement, although it is often criticized for having no viable way to do this in a [[self-funding]] manner.		The FSF wrote the [[GPL]] and [[GFDL]] and takes some responsibility for their enforcement, although it is often criticized for having no viable way to do this in a [[self-funding]] manner.

	The [[open source]] and some [[consortia]] (like [[W3]] and [[Java]]) were both responses to issues with GPL, and other aspects of FSF's ideology and solutions. [[Creative Commons]] was likewise inspired by, but critical of, [[GFDL]].		The [[open source]] and some [[consortia]] (like [[W3]] and [[Java]]) were both responses to issues with GPL, and other aspects of FSF's ideology and solutions. [[Creative Commons]] was likewise inspired by, but critical of, [[GFDL]]. ''See [[problems with free software and open source models]] for other views on this.''

142.177.12.26 at 19:44, 9 April 2004

2004-04-09T19:44:07Z

New page

The '''Free Software Foundation''' or '''FSF''' is at http://fsf.org

It is also sometimes called '''GNU''' after its original project, "GNU's Not Unix." It uses a gnu-head as its symbol. It is identified with [[Richard Stallman]], who is approximately as stubborn as any hoofed animal imaginable.

The FSF wrote the [[GPL]] and [[GFDL]] and takes some responsibility for their enforcement, although it is often criticized for having no viable way to do this in a [[self-funding]] manner.

The [[open source]] and some [[consortia]] (like [[W3]] and [[Java]]) were both responses to issues with GPL, and other aspects of FSF's ideology and solutions. [[Creative Commons]] was likewise inspired by, but critical of, [[GFDL]].