<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://develop.consumerium.org/w/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Factional_point_of_view</id>
	<title>Factional point of view - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://develop.consumerium.org/w/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Factional_point_of_view"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://develop.consumerium.org/w/index.php?title=Factional_point_of_view&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-05-04T12:10:07Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.43.6</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://develop.consumerium.org/w/index.php?title=Factional_point_of_view&amp;diff=41171&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>24.224.172.198: factions can be helpful</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://develop.consumerium.org/w/index.php?title=Factional_point_of_view&amp;diff=41171&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2012-07-16T20:14:01Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;factions can be helpful&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;A &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;factional point of view&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; emerges when a [[tendency]] to see things a certain way becomes more than one of many [[multiple point of view]] but has the active alliance, loyalty and support of a particular group of people committed to that view and only that view.  When [[factionally-defined term]]s come to be seen as real by such a group, they may find other factions incomprehensible or consider them to lack [[moral goodness]].  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Advocates of [[extreme standardization]] often consider [[factionalism]] &amp;quot;bad&amp;quot;, but no democracy exists on Earth without multiple competing political parties, so the evidence is otherwise.  One-party states tend to be stagnant and fail, and to become unified with the bureaucracy.  The same will be true of mechanisms within a [[healthy buying infrastructure]] like [[Consumerium itself]].  From time to time, the power structure must change.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While a faction can [[fork off]] completely (hopefully with a peaceful [[interwiki]] agreement for [[mutual ethical trolling]] of the &amp;quot;original&amp;quot; wiki or project), the longer it can be accomodated within a project usually the better.  Extremely successful projects like those of [[Wikimedia Foundation]] have high tolerance for factional points of view if properly marked and if not presented as universally agreed. Some mechanisms [[Consumerium itself]] might consider:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*A [[faction license]] may specify different conditions for using code or [[open content]] for a particular faction, one that will encourage contribution or correction from that faction&lt;br /&gt;
*A [[faction tag]] might be applied to indicate information stated in [[factionally-defined term]]s that could be neutralized or at least defined, or to users who are demonstrating adamant loyalty to a particular faction or one of the &amp;quot;four gs&amp;quot; [[golf]], [[gold]], a [[GodKing]] or [[Global warming promotion society]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Distrust]] and [[factional rank]] mechanisms so that approval of one faction can be discounted (or even entirely reversed as default disapproval) of an opposed faction - a simple start to which would be the ability to invert rankings from particular users whom one deems to be loyal to a [[mistrust]]ed faction.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>24.224.172.198</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>