142.X.X.X at 06:02, 4 December 2003

2003-12-04T06:02:09Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:02, 4 December 2003
Line 6:		Line 6:

	Still, some claim '''evil''' can be objectively and globally defined and that at least some of what is [[not evil]] could be detected by some [[audit]]. How [[fair]] could such a definition be? At the very least it would have to satisfy participants and observers that their own ideas of what is [[safe]] and [[done]] are respected. [[Faction]]s make it impossible to settle on one strict and global definition, so this is a '''''[[contested term]] - see [[glossary]] for other such contested terms.''''' Probably it is best to consider '''evil''' to be [[factionally defined]].		Still, some claim '''evil''' can be objectively and globally defined and that at least some of what is [[not evil]] could be detected by some [[audit]]. How [[fair]] could such a definition be? At the very least it would have to satisfy participants and observers that their own ideas of what is [[safe]] and [[done]] are respected. [[Faction]]s make it impossible to settle on one strict and global definition, so this is a '''''[[contested term]] - see [[glossary]] for other such contested terms.''''' Probably it is best to consider '''evil''' to be [[factionally defined]].

			''See also'': [[extreme standards]]

142.177.109.153 at 19:21, 7 June 2003

2003-06-07T19:21:53Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:21, 7 June 2003
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Evil is an behavioural pattern which ~~has influenced some humans since~~ the ~~begining of recorded time~~.		Evil is the external view of a behavioural pattern which seems to be built-in to primates. It is sometimes characterized in terms of '''sin''', most famously the '''seven deadly sins''': [[greed]], [[envy]], [[wrath]], [[sloth]], [[vanity]], [[lust]] and [[gluttony]]. Modern technological society seems to be based on these seven principles, plus an eighth principle, [[passing the buck]].

	The ~~motivations for~~ evil ~~behaviour could~~ be:		Evil behaviour is often considered to be that which is carried out with little or no regard for the (often intentional) pain inflicted on others. However, all human behaviour is carried out this way, ultimately, if we consider others far outside our personal social loop, or creatures of other species. So an event or process or thing is usually only considered '''evil''' when it becomes so extreme as to violate a [[faction]]'s agreed upon [[threshold of acceptable ignorance]] and cast light on ourselves. For instance, most child molesters are parents or near relatives. The "poaching" behavour of a sexual predator who is a genuine stranger is thus regarded as particularly evil, in part because it brings scrutiny on those closer in a child's family, who may be doing the same. Hating and prosecuting the relatively rare paedophile is simply one way that a community assures itself that it is "better" - the pain inflicted on children by the highly traumatic process of adult investigation, and on the adult who is by most definitions simply a sick and compulsive person, is simply not regarded. For these reasons many social workers advise simply not reporting such cases - the evil that results from the system "working as it should" is just too high.

	[[~~greed~~]]		This represents a shift away from [[trust]] in centralized systems or judgement. Historically "agreed upon" standards are set by one party and physically forced on another who is usually forced to trust the [[authority]] of a [[moral code]], along with their own personal judgement (or terror) of what will occur if they do not obey. For example, the '''sins''' above are the product of Roman Catholic thought, which was historically part of the Christian traditions. Of course in their turn the Christians were thought to be '''evil''' for refusing to worship the Roman Emperor as a god (Christians were similarly persecuted in Japan). Today it is unpopular to claim that there is any one definition of evil that humans can objectively assess and apply.
	[[~~selfishness~~]]
	[[~~envy~~]]

			Still, some claim '''evil''' can be objectively and globally defined and that at least some of what is [[not evil]] could be detected by some [[audit]]. How [[fair]] could such a definition be? At the very least it would have to satisfy participants and observers that their own ideas of what is [[safe]] and [[done]] are respected. [[Faction]]s make it impossible to settle on one strict and global definition, so this is a '''''[[contested term]] - see [[glossary]] for other such contested terms.''''' Probably it is best to consider '''evil''' to be [[factionally defined]].
	~~Evil behaviour~~ is that ~~which~~ is ~~carried out with little or no regard~~ for ~~the (often intentional) pain inflicted on others~~.

65.95.162.198 at 05:01, 7 June 2003

2003-06-07T05:01:29Z

New page

Evil is an behavioural pattern which has influenced some humans since the begining of recorded time.

The motivations for evil behaviour could be:

[[greed]]
[[selfishness]]
[[envy]]

Evil behaviour is that which is carried out with little or no regard for the (often intentional) pain inflicted on others.

Evil - Revision history

142.X.X.X at 06:02, 4 December 2003

142.177.109.153 at 19:21, 7 June 2003

65.95.162.198 at 05:01, 7 June 2003