<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://develop.consumerium.org/w/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Echo_chamber</id>
	<title>Echo chamber - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://develop.consumerium.org/w/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Echo_chamber"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://develop.consumerium.org/w/index.php?title=Echo_chamber&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-05-08T06:31:05Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.43.6</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://develop.consumerium.org/w/index.php?title=Echo_chamber&amp;diff=14311&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>142.177.74.66: why it&#039;s the worst possible thing to import from Wikipedia</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://develop.consumerium.org/w/index.php?title=Echo_chamber&amp;diff=14311&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2003-12-23T23:04:38Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;why it&amp;#039;s the worst possible thing to import from Wikipedia&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;An &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;echo chamber&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; is &amp;quot;a group of media outlets that tend to parrot each other&amp;#039;s uncritical reports on the views of a single source, or that otherwise relies on unquestioning repetition of official sources.&amp;quot;  The term is relevant to a [[large public wiki]] in that such tactics are common on mailing lists and in other non-[[reflexive]] forums used to discuss [[governance]] and whether to [[block IP]] (the most critical governance issue).  That is, there is no [[due process]] of any kind, and popular people may lie and have lies repeated without limit, resulting in false impressions of others&amp;#039; behaviour or intent.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Those who propagate, or even tolerate (from official positions) the &amp;quot;echo chamber effect&amp;quot;, do profound damage to the credibility of any project.  If they are permitted to influence actual decisions, particularly those that affect the discourse and [[free circulation of fiction]] (such as &amp;quot;reverting&amp;quot; talk files, or censoring valid textual contributions and references, and corrections), then they are probably the single most destructive influence on any wiki-based work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An incomplete list of people who have propagated or amplified this effect would probably be unfair to assemble in the main article.  However see [[Talk:echo chamber]] for examples where they can be discussed and debated on a more even basis without &amp;quot;[[revert war]]&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.disinfopedia.org/wiki.phtml?title=Echo_chamber Disinfopedia: echo chamber]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>142.177.74.66</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>