Content Wiki - Revision history

Jukeboksi: rm templates add intermediate pages

2004-08-28T15:53:20Z

rm templates add intermediate pages

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:53, 28 August 2004
Line 47:		Line 47:
	*[[WorkDescription]]		*[[WorkDescription]]

	We need to start forming ~~templates~~ to advance the launch of the Content Wiki:		We need to start forming syntax for [[Consumerium:Intermediate pages\|Intermediate pages]] to advance the launch of the Content Wiki
	*[[Company template]]
	*[[Product template]]
	*[[ProductGroup template]]
	*[[Campaign template]]
	*[[WorkDescription template]]
	*[[Country template]]
	----		----

142.177.82.76: too many issues on this page; work out the process first, the structure later - will have to hack on this a bit and move some stuff to other pages

2004-03-11T03:16:54Z

too many issues on this page; work out the process first, the structure later - will have to hack on this a bit and move some stuff to other pages

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:16, 11 March 2004
Line 1:		Line 1:
			''Is this the same as the [[Signal Wiki]]? If not, why not? What must be done to the data before it affects the [[Consumerium buying signal]]? And when?''

			''This page is not for actual [[features\|content]] (i.e. do not attempt to classify [[CIV]] or [[Gus Kouwenhoven]] or what they are doing on this page) but for developing the syntax and governance of the Content Wiki so we can set one up.''

			''It also is not about opinions, (ie. [[Campaign]]s and split articles on aspects where [[faction]]s do not agree), which go to [[Research Wiki]] aka [[Opinion Wiki]] where further research is performed. Whatever it is called, this consists of [[Consumerium:intermediate page]]s which are often debated.''

	==What is the Content Wiki?==		==What is the Content Wiki?==

Line 6:		Line 12:

	The [[Consumerium Governance Organization]] and its delegated [[sysop]]s will have to decide on what grounds each type of information is input, audited, linked, shared, duplicated, edited, contested, vetoed and removed and by whom.		The [[Consumerium Governance Organization]] and its delegated [[sysop]]s will have to decide on what grounds each type of information is input, audited, linked, shared, duplicated, edited, contested, vetoed and removed and by whom.

	~~'''Opinions''' (ie. [[Campaign]]s and split articles on aspects where [[faction]]s do not agree) go to [[Opinion Wiki]] when it gets built.~~

	This page is not for actual [[features\|content]] (i.e. do not attempt to classify [[CIV]] or [[Gus Kouwenhoven]] or what they are doing on this page) but for developing the syntax and governance of the Content Wiki so we can set one up.

	----		----
	==Wiki software==		==Wiki software for handling research ==
	To [[fork]] or not to fork that is the question. Which of the [[wiki code]] alternatives to use? It is natural to presume that the wiki software will be either:		To [[fork]] or not to fork that is the question. Which of the [[wiki code]] alternatives to use? It is natural to presume that the wiki software will be either:

Jukeboksi: noting the fresh fork from MediaWiki to GetWiki

2004-03-07T15:42:08Z

noting the fresh fork from MediaWiki to GetWiki

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:42, 7 March 2004
Line 17:		Line 17:
	#[[MediaWiki]] unmodified		#[[MediaWiki]] unmodified
	#'''[[MediaWiki modifications\|MediaWiki modified]]'''		#'''[[MediaWiki modifications\|MediaWiki modified]]'''
	#A fork of MediaWiki		#[[GetWiki\|A fork of MediaWiki, such as GetWiki]]
	#[[TikiWiki]] unmodified		#[[TikiWiki]] unmodified
	#TikiWiki modified		#TikiWiki modified

142.177.106.224: link to alternate name (which will redir to discussion for those interested)

2004-02-23T19:22:19Z

link to alternate name (which will redir to discussion for those interested)

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:22, 23 February 2004
Line 1:		Line 1:
	==What is the Content Wiki?==		==What is the Content Wiki?==

	Content Wiki is where '''facts''' on [[product]]s and [[companies]] and such will be stored when it gets built. Facts require more discipline than [[opinion wiki]] comments. When we say "fact" we mean [[instructional capital]] that all [[faction]]s accept as "true" at least to the degree it is allowed to alter the [[Consumerium buying signal]].		Content Wiki is where '''facts''' on [[product]]s and [[companies]] and such will be stored when it gets built. Facts require more discipline than [[opinion wiki]] comments. When we say "fact" we mean [[instructional capital]] that all [[faction]]s accept as "true" at least to the degree it is allowed to alter the [[Consumerium buying signal]]. ''Another proposed name for this is the [[Signal Wiki]], which makes this relationship very clear.''

	It will be a [[large public wiki]] with the special problems of that type of communication.		It will be a [[large public wiki]] with the special problems of that type of communication.

Jukeboksi: moving Campaign to Opinion Wiki

2004-02-17T13:59:34Z

moving Campaign to Opinion Wiki

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:59, 17 February 2004
Line 43:		Line 43:
	*[[Product]]:		*[[Product]]:
	*[[Product Group]]:		*[[Product Group]]:
	*[[Campaign]]
	*[[WorkDescription]]		*[[WorkDescription]]

Jukeboksi: minor edits

2004-02-17T12:10:15Z

minor edits

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:10, 17 February 2004
Line 43:		Line 43:
	*[[Product]]:		*[[Product]]:
	*[[Product Group]]:		*[[Product Group]]:
			*[[Campaign]]
			*[[WorkDescription]]

	We need to start forming templates to advance the launch of the Content Wiki:		We need to start forming templates to advance the launch of the Content Wiki:

142.177.103.239 at 00:47, 22 December 2003

2003-12-22T00:47:59Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:47, 22 December 2003
Line 2:		Line 2:

	Content Wiki is where '''facts''' on [[product]]s and [[companies]] and such will be stored when it gets built. Facts require more discipline than [[opinion wiki]] comments. When we say "fact" we mean [[instructional capital]] that all [[faction]]s accept as "true" at least to the degree it is allowed to alter the [[Consumerium buying signal]].		Content Wiki is where '''facts''' on [[product]]s and [[companies]] and such will be stored when it gets built. Facts require more discipline than [[opinion wiki]] comments. When we say "fact" we mean [[instructional capital]] that all [[faction]]s accept as "true" at least to the degree it is allowed to alter the [[Consumerium buying signal]].

			It will be a [[large public wiki]] with the special problems of that type of communication.

	The [[Consumerium Governance Organization]] and its delegated [[sysop]]s will have to decide on what grounds each type of information is input, audited, linked, shared, duplicated, edited, contested, vetoed and removed and by whom.		The [[Consumerium Governance Organization]] and its delegated [[sysop]]s will have to decide on what grounds each type of information is input, audited, linked, shared, duplicated, edited, contested, vetoed and removed and by whom.

Jukeboksi: ...

2003-12-15T06:17:36Z

...

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:17, 15 December 2003
Line 41:		Line 41:
	*[[Product]]:		*[[Product]]:
	*[[Product Group]]:		*[[Product Group]]:
	*[[Campaign]]:

	We need to start forming templates to advance the launch of the Content Wiki:		We need to start forming templates to advance the launch of the Content Wiki:
Line 51:		Line 50:
	*[[Country template]]		*[[Country template]]
	----		----

	==Article Structure==		==Article Structure==

Jukeboksi: added empty link to Country template and removed Campaign-namespace wondering how ever it got here

2003-12-15T06:17:06Z

added empty link to Country template and removed Campaign-namespace wondering how ever it got here

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:17, 15 December 2003
Line 37:		Line 37:
	If a modified version will be used it makes sense to use many more namespaces to make the wiki more manageable, but on the other hand using standard MediaWiki has many advantages. Using unmodified MediaWiki would just require stricter syntax within the articles		If a modified version will be used it makes sense to use many more namespaces to make the wiki more manageable, but on the other hand using standard MediaWiki has many advantages. Using unmodified MediaWiki would just require stricter syntax within the articles

	According to MediaWiki developers adding numerous namespaces is easy so here is a brief and uncomplete list of likely namespaces:		According to MediaWiki developers adding numerous namespaces is easy so here is a brief and uncomplete list of likely namespaces. Using '''pseudo-namespaces''' might also be applicable:
	*[[Company]]:		*[[Company]]:
	*[[Product]]:		*[[Product]]:
	*[[Product Group]]:		*[[Product Group]]:
	*[[Campaign]]		*[[Campaign]]:

	We need to start forming templates to advance the launch of the Content Wiki:		We need to start forming templates to advance the launch of the Content Wiki:
Line 49:		Line 49:
	*[[Campaign template]]		*[[Campaign template]]
	*[[WorkDescription template]]		*[[WorkDescription template]]
			*[[Country template]]
	----		----
	==Article Structure==		==Article Structure==

Jukeboksi: moving outlining article structure to Article structure

2003-12-02T16:24:48Z

moving outlining article structure to Article structure

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:24, 2 December 2003
Line 68:		Line 68:
	*Optional subarticles		*Optional subarticles

	When thinking about companies an outline of subarticle structure ~~might be something like~~		When thinking about companies an outline of subarticle structure is discussed in [[Article structure]]

	* [[~~Company X]] - containing [[product group]]s, [[brand]]s, [[product]]s etc.~~
	* [[Company X/ids]] (mandatory) - registered names, national registry numbers, d-u-n-s, stock symbols etc.
	* [[Company X/economy]] - subpaging further like [[Company X/economy/2003Q4]]
	* [[Company X/history]]
	* [[Company X/affiliated businesses]]
	* [[Company X/executives]]
	* [[Company X/advertising]]
	* [[Company X/labor practices]]
	* [[Company X/workplace upgrade requests]]
	* ...		* ...