Jukeboksi: attempting to fix a misleading sentence

2004-08-19T12:38:44Z

attempting to fix a misleading sentence

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:38, 19 August 2004
Line 1:		Line 1:
	The idea of '''content''' is basically stupid. We must be more specific. Let us refer separately to		The idea of '''content''' is basically stupid. We must be more specific. Let us refer separately to

	*~~[[What Consumerium RD Wiki is not\|~~Development-oriented]] [[open content]], e.g. ~~under a [[Green Documentation License]] as opposed to [[wiki code]] under a [[Green Software License]] which is~~ [[Develop Wiki]] '''content''' - and is presently entirely under [[GFDL]].		*Development-oriented [[open content]], e.g. [[Develop Wiki]] '''content''' - and is presently entirely under [[GFDL]].
	*More than a few [[interesting companies]], [[interesting projects]] and [[links]] are primarily interesting because they might provide [[Research Wiki]] '''content'''. The [[license]] and [[political choice]] implied by it might lead us to some [[worst cases]] so we should consider this carefully.		*More than a few [[interesting companies]], [[interesting projects]] and [[links]] are primarily interesting because they might provide [[Research Wiki]] '''content'''. The [[license]] and [[political choice]] implied by it might lead us to some [[worst cases]] so we should consider this carefully.
	*[[Publish Wiki]] '''content''' is the primary concern of the [[governance organization]], i.e. [[Consumerium Governance Organization]] delivering [[Consumerium Services]] formally and legally and assuming all [[liability]].		*[[Publish Wiki]] '''content''' is the primary concern of the [[governance organization]], i.e. [[Consumerium Governance Organization]] delivering [[Consumerium Services]] formally and legally and assuming all [[liability]].

142.177.104.163: disambiguating three types of so-called "content"

2004-08-18T21:38:01Z

disambiguating three types of so-called "content"

New page

The idea of '''content''' is basically stupid. We must be more specific. Let us refer separately to

*[[What Consumerium RD Wiki is not|Development-oriented]] [[open content]], e.g. under a [[Green Documentation License]] as opposed to [[wiki code]] under a [[Green Software License]] which is [[Develop Wiki]] '''content''' - and is presently entirely under [[GFDL]].
*More than a few [[interesting companies]], [[interesting projects]] and [[links]] are primarily interesting because they might provide [[Research Wiki]] '''content'''. The [[license]] and [[political choice]] implied by it might lead us to some [[worst cases]] so we should consider this carefully.
*[[Publish Wiki]] '''content''' is the primary concern of the [[governance organization]], i.e. [[Consumerium Governance Organization]] delivering [[Consumerium Services]] formally and legally and assuming all [[liability]].

Content - Revision history

Jukeboksi: attempting to fix a misleading sentence

142.177.104.163: disambiguating three types of so-called "content"