Consumerium talk:Rules - Revision history

142.177.74.51: How much more democratic can it get?

2004-07-23T22:47:56Z

How much more democratic can it get?

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:47, 23 July 2004
Line 28:		Line 28:

	::[[trolls]] choose [[black]] as the anarchist colour, and for the security of the dark.		::[[trolls]] choose [[black]] as the anarchist colour, and for the security of the dark.

			::and we agree it is theatre.

			::but what "power grabbing"? We have no [[technological escalation]] ability: no [[bot]], no [[IP block]]. Everything [[trolls]] do must be by persuasion. How much more democratic can it get?

142.177.74.51: black?

2004-07-23T22:46:27Z

black?

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:46, 23 July 2004
Line 26:		Line 26:

	:yeay. --[[User:Juxo\|Juxo]] 00:05, 24 Jul 2004 (EEST)		:yeay. --[[User:Juxo\|Juxo]] 00:05, 24 Jul 2004 (EEST)

			::[[trolls]] choose [[black]] as the anarchist colour, and for the security of the dark.

Jukeboksi: yeay.

2004-07-23T21:05:15Z

yeay.

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:05, 23 July 2004
Line 24:		Line 24:

	Having their own faction that has no color thus it is not viewable to human eyes renders them transparent giving them superiour stealth for doing many kinds of power grabbing. They (the trolls) may be useful in some ways for us to reach our stated goal of enabling [[political consumerism]] but I must strongly suggest that they cease to demand that [[faction]]s be associated with colors while they insist on remaining without color. If they do not do this peacefully a [[sysop power structure]] will have to be formed to see to that this outrageous inbalance of this theatre is eradicated. --[[User:Wittgenstein\|Wittgenstein]] 20:25, 23 Jul 2004 (EEST)		Having their own faction that has no color thus it is not viewable to human eyes renders them transparent giving them superiour stealth for doing many kinds of power grabbing. They (the trolls) may be useful in some ways for us to reach our stated goal of enabling [[political consumerism]] but I must strongly suggest that they cease to demand that [[faction]]s be associated with colors while they insist on remaining without color. If they do not do this peacefully a [[sysop power structure]] will have to be formed to see to that this outrageous inbalance of this theatre is eradicated. --[[User:Wittgenstein\|Wittgenstein]] 20:25, 23 Jul 2004 (EEST)

			:yeay. --[[User:Juxo\|Juxo]] 00:05, 24 Jul 2004 (EEST)

Wittgenstein: on colors, trolls and factions

2004-07-23T17:25:01Z

on colors, trolls and factions

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:25, 23 July 2004
Line 20:		Line 20:

	We need some bad examples of people worth stopping, or else, we won't attract the people here who really want to stop them. It's only those people that have the motivation to get this done.		We need some bad examples of people worth stopping, or else, we won't attract the people here who really want to stop them. It's only those people that have the motivation to get this done.
			----
			I have observed these users who prefer them to be refered to as [[trolls]] ''(plural)'' and confusingly also as [[troll]] ''(singular)'' which they denounce as ''not applicable'' on many, many counts as they refuse identity. These "trolls" seem to insist that proper [[wiki governance]] can be achieved only by implementing a way of categorizing people in things they call [[faction]]s. They constantly attack the integrity of [[sysops]] and especially software developers accusing them of [[corruption]]; the sole source of corruption to be more precise and quite simultaneously they push for confining people into factions identified by [[Silly colorology\|colors]] on something they call a [[political spectrum]] and not noting the fact that they have formed a faction called the simply "The [[Trolls]]", which is without any color.

			Having their own faction that has no color thus it is not viewable to human eyes renders them transparent giving them superiour stealth for doing many kinds of power grabbing. They (the trolls) may be useful in some ways for us to reach our stated goal of enabling [[political consumerism]] but I must strongly suggest that they cease to demand that [[faction]]s be associated with colors while they insist on remaining without color. If they do not do this peacefully a [[sysop power structure]] will have to be formed to see to that this outrageous inbalance of this theatre is eradicated. --[[User:Wittgenstein\|Wittgenstein]] 20:25, 23 Jul 2004 (EEST)

142.177.81.243: a few bad people's bios ought to be reflected here, but not originated here

2003-10-28T17:16:13Z

a few bad people's bios ought to be reflected here, but not originated here

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:16, 28 October 2003
Line 10:		Line 10:

	[[Body politic]] = those bodies we care to represent		[[Body politic]] = those bodies we care to represent


			---


			About persons, e.g. [[Gus Kouwenhoven]], "Do that in Disinfopedia or Wikipedia so we don't have to worry about Disinformation or being Biased so much yet."

			This policy is right. But according to those, this is quite possibly the worst person in the world who is not running a government but a corporation. Surely we should not originate such reports, but why can't we reflect them?

			We need some bad examples of people worth stopping, or else, we won't attract the people here who really want to stop them. It's only those people that have the motivation to get this done.

142.177.82.115 at 19:56, 17 October 2003

2003-10-17T19:56:08Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:56, 17 October 2003
Line 1:		Line 1:
	We should talk about [[every body]] and [[any body]], ~~the same as~~ [[some body]] and [[no body]], wherever we can. These terms are very clear, but [[user]], [[troll]], [[sysop]], [[community]], [[registered user]], [[bunch of IP numbers that seem to say kind of the same things]] are not.		We should talk about [[every body]] and [[any body]], and also [[some body]] and [[no body]], wherever we can. These terms are very clear, but [[user]], [[troll]], [[sysop]], [[community]], [[registered user]], [[bunch of IP numbers that seem to say kind of the same things]] are not.

			[[No body]] = bots, corporations, ideologies, God

			[[Some body]] = alive and able to feel something, and we care about it, e.g. humans, orang-utans, whales

			[[Any body]] = any body who counts as some body, indefinite article, inclusive.

			[[Every body]] = all the some bodies together with no no bodies included

			[[Body politic]] = those bodies we care to represent

142.177.82.115 at 19:53, 17 October 2003

2003-10-17T19:53:47Z

New page

We should talk about [[every body]] and [[any body]], the same as [[some body]] and [[no body]], wherever we can. These terms are very clear, but [[user]], [[troll]], [[sysop]], [[community]], [[registered user]], [[bunch of IP numbers that seem to say kind of the same things]] are not.