Consumerium talk:Philosophy - Revision history

142.177.94.118: transparency, reflexivity, both critical, and need to be mentioned in the "philosophy"

2004-03-14T22:36:21Z

transparency, reflexivity, both critical, and need to be mentioned in the "philosophy"

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:36, 14 March 2004
Line 10:		Line 10:
	The only assumption we make, is to make no assumptions that we aren't forced to make.		The only assumption we make, is to make no assumptions that we aren't forced to make.
	:Actually this is not true, at least for me, i've been making assumptions about many things sometimes failing to anticipate the future development sometimes hitting bulls eye and sometimes i'm just not informed. One example is the I figured there were no services similar to [[Consumerium:Itself]] before I discovered many [[Product registries]] exist already. --[[User:Juxo\|Juxo]] 13:11, 14 Mar 2004 (EET)		:Actually this is not true, at least for me, i've been making assumptions about many things sometimes failing to anticipate the future development sometimes hitting bulls eye and sometimes i'm just not informed. One example is the I figured there were no services similar to [[Consumerium:Itself]] before I discovered many [[Product registries]] exist already. --[[User:Juxo\|Juxo]] 13:11, 14 Mar 2004 (EET)

			--------

			Both of the above points need to be made somehow in the article. If one has no link to [[Transparent Consumerium]] then it isn't clear that [[w:transparency]] is really part of the philosophy. If there's no link to [[Consumerium:Itself]] then it isn't clear that reflexivity is part of the philosophy. And I think in both cases, they are. These are both important [[troll-friendly]] concepts too but you don't have to put that in the philosophy. ;-0 Trolls eat philosophy. Yum yum.

			Look at [http://recyclopedia.info/wiki/wiki.phtml?title=Recyclopedia:policy en: Recyclopedia:policy]. It's about the simplest reflexivity statement possible.

Jukeboksi: i think we are making assumptions offhandedly all the time

2004-03-14T11:11:27Z

i think we are making assumptions offhandedly all the time

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:11, 14 March 2004
Line 5:		Line 5:

	We can't really make it any simpler than that.		We can't really make it any simpler than that.
			----
			[[Consumerium:Itself]] contains all the information required to change it. It is [[reflexive]], as [[wikis]] tend to be. This is what makes it likely to work, even if the starting place is wrong.

			The only assumption we make, is to make no assumptions that we aren't forced to make.
			:Actually this is not true, at least for me, i've been making assumptions about many things sometimes failing to anticipate the future development sometimes hitting bulls eye and sometimes i'm just not informed. One example is the I figured there were no services similar to [[Consumerium:Itself]] before I discovered many [[Product registries]] exist already. --[[User:Juxo\|Juxo]] 13:11, 14 Mar 2004 (EET)

Jukeboksi: moved

2003-12-13T18:10:43Z

moved

New page

'''Moved'''

A fully [[Transparent Consumerium]] is a long term goal we may never reach. But if we could, we would. We don't have any special insight into any of this. We just got here first to lay the foundations. You are as likely as we are to be right. That's why this is a wiki, and why you can always [http://www.consumerium.org/wiki/wiki.phtml?title=Consudev:Philosophy&action=edit "edit this page"] if you disagree.

We can't really make it any simpler than that.