Consumerium talk:Intermediate barcode page - Revision history

142.177.103.58: stickers on fruit - sort of barcodes, sort of not

2004-08-28T15:45:51Z

stickers on fruit - sort of barcodes, sort of not

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:45, 28 August 2004
Line 3:		Line 3:
	:If they really are separate, absolutely right. However they are not quite separate: Sometimes big purchasers apply their own barcodes or different packaging has different barcodes. If this is VERY uncommon then we can avoid mixing them, as you say. If it is even going on 5% of the time they we have to think of the barcode as the product of channel and product information at once.		:If they really are separate, absolutely right. However they are not quite separate: Sometimes big purchasers apply their own barcodes or different packaging has different barcodes. If this is VERY uncommon then we can avoid mixing them, as you say. If it is even going on 5% of the time they we have to think of the barcode as the product of channel and product information at once.

	:Also things like fruit and vegetables and bulk items have no packaging but instead they have stickers with numbers that vary per [[channel]] but probably not per location...		:Also things like fruit and vegetables and bulk items have no packaging but instead they have stickers with numbers that vary per [[channel]] but probably not per location... We need to think about [[stickers on fruit]] very carefully.

	:This is a question some [[researcher]] should be able to resolve.		:This is a question some [[researcher]] should be able to resolve.

	:By the way it is good to get past various [[power structure]] issues and get back to real work...		:By the way it is good to get past various [[power structure]] issues and get back to real work...

142.177.103.58 at 15:41, 28 August 2004

2004-08-28T15:41:38Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:41, 28 August 2004
Line 2:		Line 2:

	:If they really are separate, absolutely right. However they are not quite separate: Sometimes big purchasers apply their own barcodes or different packaging has different barcodes. If this is VERY uncommon then we can avoid mixing them, as you say. If it is even going on 5% of the time they we have to think of the barcode as the product of channel and product information at once.		:If they really are separate, absolutely right. However they are not quite separate: Sometimes big purchasers apply their own barcodes or different packaging has different barcodes. If this is VERY uncommon then we can avoid mixing them, as you say. If it is even going on 5% of the time they we have to think of the barcode as the product of channel and product information at once.

			:Also things like fruit and vegetables and bulk items have no packaging but instead they have stickers with numbers that vary per [[channel]] but probably not per location...

	:This is a question some [[researcher]] should be able to resolve.		:This is a question some [[researcher]] should be able to resolve.

	:By the way it is good to get past various [[power structure]] issues and get back to real work...		:By the way it is good to get past various [[power structure]] issues and get back to real work...

142.177.103.58: mostly right, but, if there are more than 2% to 5% exceptions, the barcode combines product and company information

2004-08-28T15:40:29Z

mostly right, but, if there are more than 2% to 5% exceptions, the barcode combines product and company information

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:40, 28 August 2004
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Let's not mix [[barcode]] and [[channel]] issues. The [[retail]] locations have no [[barcode]], they have a [[company]] that owns them and [[companies]] they work with and a classification within the chain hierarchy (sometimes) which identifies the service / product range of a particular location and naturally an ~~adress~~. --[[User:Juxo\|Juxo]] 18:35, 28 Aug 2004 (EEST)		Let's not mix [[barcode]] and [[channel]] issues. The [[retail]] locations have no [[barcode]], they have a [[company]] that owns them and [[companies]] they work with and a classification within the chain hierarchy (sometimes) which identifies the service / product range of a particular location and naturally an address. --[[User:Juxo\|Juxo]] 18:35, 28 Aug 2004 (EEST)

			:If they really are separate, absolutely right. However they are not quite separate: Sometimes big purchasers apply their own barcodes or different packaging has different barcodes. If this is VERY uncommon then we can avoid mixing them, as you say. If it is even going on 5% of the time they we have to think of the barcode as the product of channel and product information at once.

			:This is a question some [[researcher]] should be able to resolve.

			:By the way it is good to get past various [[power structure]] issues and get back to real work...

Jukeboksi: whooa. hold your horses

2004-08-28T15:35:55Z

whooa. hold your horses

New page

Let's not mix [[barcode]] and [[channel]] issues. The [[retail]] locations have no [[barcode]], they have a [[company]] that owns them and [[companies]] they work with and a classification within the chain hierarchy (sometimes) which identifies the service / product range of a particular location and naturally an adress. --[[User:Juxo|Juxo]] 18:35, 28 Aug 2004 (EEST)