Chief Editor - Revision history

142.177.108.112: type of person we need for this

2004-09-14T08:14:38Z

type of person we need for this

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:14, 14 September 2004
Line 12:		Line 12:

	A [[Consumerium Governance Organization election]] may be held for this post, but, it may be better to simply appoint the meanest qualified legal troll we can find: someone who actually enjoys fighting in court and in the press, and has no problem digging up dirt on [[enemy project]]s and spreading it all over.		A [[Consumerium Governance Organization election]] may be held for this post, but, it may be better to simply appoint the meanest qualified legal troll we can find: someone who actually enjoys fighting in court and in the press, and has no problem digging up dirt on [[enemy project]]s and spreading it all over.

			''For example, the kind of mean-spirited attack dog who would expose [[alleged Wikimedia corruption]] and answer to all the false claims of making false claims in [[false or unsubstantiated claims of corruption]] again and again until [[ending Wikimedia\|his enemy is discredited, demoralized and destroyed]]. That's the kind of person we need as the '''Chief Editor'''!''

Jukeboksi: rm useless psycho-trollism

2004-09-10T10:08:48Z

rm useless psycho-trollism

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:08, 10 September 2004
Line 8:		Line 8:

	:"Your company is destroying X and Y and we believe we can prove that in court. We intend to expose you and keep others from buying your product. We do not believe that [[diluting the trademark]] or [[interfering with business]] are valid claims to make against those exposing people and companies like you, and we have the funds and friends to take this to a constitutional or human rights or international court if necessary. You are best advised to respond via the channels already established in [[Consumerium Services]] for issues with the accuracy or relevance of the material that is presented in the [[Consumerium buying signal]]."		:"Your company is destroying X and Y and we believe we can prove that in court. We intend to expose you and keep others from buying your product. We do not believe that [[diluting the trademark]] or [[interfering with business]] are valid claims to make against those exposing people and companies like you, and we have the funds and friends to take this to a constitutional or human rights or international court if necessary. You are best advised to respond via the channels already established in [[Consumerium Services]] for issues with the accuracy or relevance of the material that is presented in the [[Consumerium buying signal]]."

	:"If you are an attorney, you are best off firing this client, because once [[Consumerium]] [[trolls]] have bit ahold of your leg, they are very unlikely to let go until that leg has been [[gnawing\|totally gnawed off]]. To lose in court to our trolls will expose you to profound scrutiny beyond even that in the [[McLibel]] case. It will be humiliating and will hurt your own personal career. So, you sociopath, quit now while you're ahead and find a less reprehensible company to work for.

	You have been warned: your client is not entitled to your help morally despite what the laws says: Very soon, you may be facing jail time for [[perjury]], and a cell mate selected specifically for your enlightenment by forces you will never know. As they sexually abuse you, remember, it was us who put you there."

	Because such responses will be controversial and must be written so as to comply (barely) with the law, this '''Chief Editor''' may need to be an attorney, one in each country and selected by the CGO for that country.		Because such responses will be controversial and must be written so as to comply (barely) with the law, this '''Chief Editor''' may need to be an attorney, one in each country and selected by the CGO for that country.

	A [[Consumerium Governance Organization election]] may be held for this post, but, it may be better to simply appoint the meanest qualified legal troll we can find: someone who actually enjoys fighting in court and in the press, and has no problem digging up dirt on [[enemy project]]s and spreading it all over.		A [[Consumerium Governance Organization election]] may be held for this post, but, it may be better to simply appoint the meanest qualified legal troll we can find: someone who actually enjoys fighting in court and in the press, and has no problem digging up dirt on [[enemy project]]s and spreading it all over.

142.177.109.161 at 19:07, 9 September 2004

2004-09-09T19:07:48Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:07, 9 September 2004
Line 1:		Line 1:
	'''Chief Editor''' of [[Publish Wiki]] takes full formal legal responsibility for the [[Consumerium buying signal]] in each country. ~~He or she answers in particular to~~ [[~~cease and desist letter~~]]s ~~sent in by nice companies that are just trying to help us tell the truth about them and do~~ [[~~brand management~~]] ~~better~~.		'''Chief Editor''' of [[Publish Wiki]] takes full formal legal responsibility for the [[Consumerium buying signal]] in each country including acting as [[copyright infringement agent]] and ensuring [[GFDL]] or other [[sharealike]] (e.g. [[GetWiki]]'s [[CC-by-nc-sa]]) license compliance required to ensure that smooth operations continue.

	This person is not necessarily authoring or editing material (that will be done by ordinary [[Publish Wiki Editor]]s, but is a specialist in discouraging companies from interfering with Consumerium. A typical response ~~willi be~~ something like:		He or she answers in particular to [[libel chill]] or [[perjufy]] with [[cease and desist letter]]s sent in by nice companies that are just trying to help us tell the truth about them and do [[brand management]] better. ;-)

			This person is not necessarily actively authoring or editing material - that will be done by ordinary [[Publish Wiki Editor]]s - but is a specialist in discouraging companies from interfering with [[Consumerium Services]] and making it clear that it is definitely a duel to the death if they start to do so:

			A typical response might read something like:

	:"Your company is destroying X and Y and we believe we can prove that in court. We intend to expose you and keep others from buying your product. We do not believe that [[diluting the trademark]] or [[interfering with business]] are valid claims to make against those exposing people and companies like you, and we have the funds and friends to take this to a constitutional or human rights or international court if necessary. You are best advised to respond via the channels already established in [[Consumerium Services]] for issues with the accuracy or relevance of the material that is presented in the [[Consumerium buying signal]]."		:"Your company is destroying X and Y and we believe we can prove that in court. We intend to expose you and keep others from buying your product. We do not believe that [[diluting the trademark]] or [[interfering with business]] are valid claims to make against those exposing people and companies like you, and we have the funds and friends to take this to a constitutional or human rights or international court if necessary. You are best advised to respond via the channels already established in [[Consumerium Services]] for issues with the accuracy or relevance of the material that is presented in the [[Consumerium buying signal]]."

	:"If you are an attorney, you are best off firing this client, because once [[Consumerium]] [[trolls]] have bit ahold of ~~someone's~~ leg, they are ~~very~~ very unlikely to let go until that leg has been [[gnawing\|totally gnawed off]]. To lose in court to our trolls will be humiliating and will hurt your career, you sociopath, so quit now while you're ahead and find a less reprehensible company to work for. You have been warned: your client is not entitled to your help morally~~, and very~~ soon, you may be facing jail time for [[perjury]], and a cell mate selected specifically for your enlightenment by forces you will never know."		:"If you are an attorney, you are best off firing this client, because once [[Consumerium]] [[trolls]] have bit ahold of your leg, they are very unlikely to let go until that leg has been [[gnawing\|totally gnawed off]]. To lose in court to our trolls will expose you to profound scrutiny beyond even that in the [[McLibel]] case. It will be humiliating and will hurt your own personal career. So, you sociopath, quit now while you're ahead and find a less reprehensible company to work for.

			You have been warned: your client is not entitled to your help morally despite what the laws says: Very soon, you may be facing jail time for [[perjury]], and a cell mate selected specifically for your enlightenment by forces you will never know. As they sexually abuse you, remember, it was us who put you there."

	Because such responses will be controversial and must be written so as to comply (barely) with the law, this '''Chief Editor''' may need to be an attorney, one in each country and selected by the CGO for that country.		Because such responses will be controversial and must be written so as to comply (barely) with the law, this '''Chief Editor''' may need to be an attorney, one in each country and selected by the CGO for that country.

	A [[Consumerium Governance Organization election]] may be held for this post, but, it may be better to simply appoint the meanest qualified legal troll we can find: someone who actually enjoys fighting in court and in the press, and has no problem digging up dirt on [[enemy project]]s and spreading it all over.		A [[Consumerium Governance Organization election]] may be held for this post, but, it may be better to simply appoint the meanest qualified legal troll we can find: someone who actually enjoys fighting in court and in the press, and has no problem digging up dirt on [[enemy project]]s and spreading it all over.

142.177.109.161: a key post

2004-09-09T18:16:19Z

a key post

New page

'''Chief Editor''' of [[Publish Wiki]] takes full formal legal responsibility for the [[Consumerium buying signal]] in each country. He or she answers in particular to [[cease and desist letter]]s sent in by nice companies that are just trying to help us tell the truth about them and do [[brand management]] better.

This person is not necessarily authoring or editing material (that will be done by ordinary [[Publish Wiki Editor]]s, but is a specialist in discouraging companies from interfering with Consumerium. A typical response willi be something like:

:"Your company is destroying X and Y and we believe we can prove that in court. We intend to expose you and keep others from buying your product. We do not believe that [[diluting the trademark]] or [[interfering with business]] are valid claims to make against those exposing people and companies like you, and we have the funds and friends to take this to a constitutional or human rights or international court if necessary. You are best advised to respond via the channels already established in [[Consumerium Services]] for issues with the accuracy or relevance of the material that is presented in the [[Consumerium buying signal]]."

:"If you are an attorney, you are best off firing this client, because once [[Consumerium]] [[trolls]] have bit ahold of someone's leg, they are very very unlikely to let go until that leg has been [[gnawing|totally gnawed off]]. To lose in court to our trolls will be humiliating and will hurt your career, you sociopath, so quit now while you're ahead and find a less reprehensible company to work for. You have been warned: your client is not entitled to your help morally, and very soon, you may be facing jail time for [[perjury]], and a cell mate selected specifically for your enlightenment by forces you will never know."

Because such responses will be controversial and must be written so as to comply (barely) with the law, this '''Chief Editor''' may need to be an attorney, one in each country and selected by the CGO for that country.

A [[Consumerium Governance Organization election]] may be held for this post, but, it may be better to simply appoint the meanest qualified legal troll we can find: someone who actually enjoys fighting in court and in the press, and has no problem digging up dirt on [[enemy project]]s and spreading it all over.