Bureaucrat - Revision history

142.177.81.89 at 16:43, 14 February 2004

2004-02-14T16:43:27Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:43, 14 February 2004
Line 1:		Line 1:
	A '''bureaucrat''' neutrally executes a process without involving any of his or her own judgement except in minute details.		A '''bureaucrat''' neutrally executes a process without involving any of his or her own judgement except in minute details.

	[[~~Wikipedia~~]] ~~used this term briefly to describe those with [[sysop]] status on more than one project,~~ who ~~are trusted to execute~~ the ~~[[sysopping protocol]] (how sysops come into being, and cease~~ to ~~exist - although the latter NEVER happens on Wikipedia which~~ is ~~run~~ by ~~a cabal devoted~~ to ~~denial of their status:[[TINC]])~~.		[[Wikimedia]] projects define a bureaucrat as "a user who has the technical ability to give other users adminship." This is necessarily defined by their access to an account with that power, as opposed to by any authorizing process separate from that access.

	There was a list of them at [[m:bureaucrat]]. Supposedly, they lose this status for abuses. But since the list includes several known abusers (Daniel Mayer, "Angela", Tim Starling and others) who always support the [[sysop power structure]] or [[usurper]]s (like the developers) there was a risk that one of them would lose bureaucrat status. Accordingly they abandoned this term and the commitment to follow any rules, then attempted to cover up by, among other things, attacking this article to remove all mention of their attempt to make their power appear legitimate. ''See also [[142.X.X.X/Flames]] for some of these issues.''		''[[Wikipedia]] also used this term briefly to describe those with [[sysop]] status on more than one project, who are trusted to execute the [[sysopping protocol]] (how sysops come into being, and cease to exist - although the latter NEVER happens on Wikipedia which is run by a cabal devoted to denial of their status:[[TINC]]). There was a list of them at [[m:bureaucrat]]. Supposedly, they would lose this status for abuses. But since the list includes several known abusers (Daniel Mayer, "Angela", Tim Starling and others) who always support the [[sysop power structure]] or [[usurper]]s (like the developers) there was a risk that one of them would lose bureaucrat status. Accordingly they abandoned this term and the commitment to follow any rules, then attempted to cover up by, among other things, attacking this article to remove all mention of their attempt to make their power appear legitimate. See also [[142.X.X.X/Flames]] for some of these issues.''

	The British TV series "Yes, Minister" and "Yes, Prime Minister" are about the way bureaucrats steal power.		This [[test balloon]] approach to seizing new powers is quite common among all stripes of bureaucrats. The British TV series "Yes, Minister" and "Yes, Prime Minister" are about the way bureaucrats steal power.

	[[Consumerium]] may be able to more correctly implement this with a political [[faction]] level that would actually put representatives of the users (and to a lesser degree the contributors) in charge of the '''bureaucrat''' activities.		[[Consumerium]] may be able to more correctly implement this with a political [[faction]] level that would actually put representatives of the users (and to a lesser degree the contributors) in charge of the '''bureaucrat''' activities.

142.177.114.15: it was making them too visible, so they hid their list, and decided not to publicly commit to following any due process or policy, or anything that might lose them their cabal-granted status

2004-02-10T21:23:00Z

it was making them too visible, so they hid their list, and decided not to publicly commit to following any due process or policy, or anything that might lose them their cabal-granted status

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:23, 10 February 2004
Line 1:		Line 1:
	A '''bureaucrat''' neutrally executes a process without involving any of his or her own judgement except in minute details.		A '''bureaucrat''' neutrally executes a process without involving any of his or her own judgement except in minute details.

			[[Wikipedia]] used this term briefly to describe those with [[sysop]] status on more than one project, who are trusted to execute the [[sysopping protocol]] (how sysops come into being, and cease to exist - although the latter NEVER happens on Wikipedia which is run by a cabal devoted to denial of their status:[[TINC]]).

			There was a list of them at [[m:bureaucrat]]. Supposedly, they lose this status for abuses. But since the list includes several known abusers (Daniel Mayer, "Angela", Tim Starling and others) who always support the [[sysop power structure]] or [[usurper]]s (like the developers) there was a risk that one of them would lose bureaucrat status. Accordingly they abandoned this term and the commitment to follow any rules, then attempted to cover up by, among other things, attacking this article to remove all mention of their attempt to make their power appear legitimate. ''See also [[142.X.X.X/Flames]] for some of these issues.''

	The British TV series "Yes, Minister" and "Yes, Prime Minister" are about the way bureaucrats steal power.		The British TV series "Yes, Minister" and "Yes, Prime Minister" are about the way bureaucrats steal power.

	[[Consumerium]] may be able to more correctly implement this with a political [[faction]] level that would actually put representatives of the users (and to a lesser degree the contributors) in charge of the '''bureaucrat''' activities.		[[Consumerium]] may be able to more correctly implement this with a political [[faction]] level that would actually put representatives of the users (and to a lesser degree the contributors) in charge of the '''bureaucrat''' activities.

Angela: remove out of date information: check the page again. There is no such list of Bureaucrats on Wikipedia

2004-02-08T23:22:40Z

remove out of date information: check the page again. There is no such list of Bureaucrats on Wikipedia

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:22, 8 February 2004
Line 1:		Line 1:
	A '''bureaucrat''' neutrally executes a process without involving any of his or her own judgement except in minute details.		A '''bureaucrat''' neutrally executes a process without involving any of his or her own judgement except in minute details.

	[[Wikipedia]] uses this term to describe those with [[sysop]] status on more than one project, who are trusted to execute the [[sysopping protocol]] (how sysops come into being, and cease to exist - although the latter NEVER happens on Wikipedia which is run by a cabal). There is a list of them at [[m:bureaucrat]]. Supposedly, they lose this status for abuses. But since the list includes several known abusers (Daniel Mayer, "Angela", Tim Starling and others) who always support the [[sysop power structure]] or [[usurper]]s (like the developers) it is not clear that anyone will ever lose bureaucrat status. More likely, they will flaunt status as a bureaucrat to "prove" that they have not abused their power, when they have.

	The British TV series "Yes, Minister" and "Yes, Prime Minister" are about the way bureaucrats steal power.		The British TV series "Yes, Minister" and "Yes, Prime Minister" are about the way bureaucrats steal power.

	[[Consumerium]] may be able to more correctly implement this with a political [[faction]] level that would actually put representatives of the users (and to a lesser degree the contributors) in charge of the '''bureaucrat''' activities.		[[Consumerium]] may be able to more correctly implement this with a political [[faction]] level that would actually put representatives of the users (and to a lesser degree the contributors) in charge of the '''bureaucrat''' activities.

142.177.12.71: right name, needs supervision by faction level

2004-02-08T19:10:07Z

right name, needs supervision by faction level

New page

A '''bureaucrat''' neutrally executes a process without involving any of his or her own judgement except in minute details.

[[Wikipedia]] uses this term to describe those with [[sysop]] status on more than one project, who are trusted to execute the [[sysopping protocol]] (how sysops come into being, and cease to exist - although the latter NEVER happens on Wikipedia which is run by a cabal). There is a list of them at [[m:bureaucrat]]. Supposedly, they lose this status for abuses. But since the list includes several known abusers (Daniel Mayer, "Angela", Tim Starling and others) who always support the [[sysop power structure]] or [[usurper]]s (like the developers) it is not clear that anyone will ever lose bureaucrat status. More likely, they will flaunt status as a bureaucrat to "prove" that they have not abused their power, when they have.

The British TV series "Yes, Minister" and "Yes, Prime Minister" are about the way bureaucrats steal power.

[[Consumerium]] may be able to more correctly implement this with a political [[faction]] level that would actually put representatives of the users (and to a lesser degree the contributors) in charge of the '''bureaucrat''' activities.