Anarcopedia - Revision history

Jukeboksi: Jukeboksi moved page Anarchopedia to Anarcopedia: Text replacement - "Anarchopedia" to "Anarcopedia"

2021-04-12T14:01:38Z

Jukeboksi moved page Anarchopedia to Anarcopedia: Text replacement - "Anarchopedia" to "Anarcopedia"

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:01, 12 April 2021
(No difference)

Jukeboksi: Text replacement - "Anarchopedia" to "Anarcopedia"

2021-04-12T14:00:56Z

Text replacement - "Anarchopedia" to "Anarcopedia"

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:00, 12 April 2021
Line 9:		Line 9:
	It is also notable for embracing a [[one wiki model]]. It has some problems addressing [[language vs. area]] specializations.		It is also notable for embracing a [[one wiki model]]. It has some problems addressing [[language vs. area]] specializations.

	* https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/~~Anarchopedia~~		* https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Anarcopedia

	[[Category:Advocacy]]		[[Category:Advocacy]]

Jukeboksi: update: name changed from Anarchopedia to Anarcopedia, and yes it is still available, but seems to be only in Italian https://www.anarcopedia.org/index.php/Anarcopedia + Category:Advocacy

2021-04-12T13:57:55Z

update: name changed from Anarchopedia to Anarcopedia, and yes it is still available, but seems to be only in Italian https://www.anarcopedia.org/index.php/Anarcopedia + Category:Advocacy

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:57, 12 April 2021
Line 1:		Line 1:
	The '''~~Anarchopedia~~''' [~~http~~://~~anarchopedia~~.org .org] is the first [[large public wiki]] to attempt to eliminate all [[sysop vandalism]].		The '''Anarcopedia''' [https://www.anarcopedia.org/index.php/Anarcopedia .org] is the first [[large public wiki]] to attempt to eliminate all [[sysop vandalism]]. It is currently available in Italian

	It's original stated goal was to let any user [[undelete page]]s, making [[ad hominem delete]] no worse a problem than [[ad hominem revert]]. Without this special power to prevent their opponents from reading the alternative view, it is thought, [[sysop power structure]] will not form at all. Apparently it has not lived up to this goal fully.		It's original stated goal was to let any user [[undelete page]]s, making [[ad hominem delete]] no worse a problem than [[ad hominem revert]]. Without this special power to prevent their opponents from reading the alternative view, it is thought, [[sysop power structure]] will not form at all. Apparently it has not lived up to this goal fully.

	The ~~Anarchopedia~~'s policy effort builds on prior efforts at [[Recyclopedia]] - an attempt to build a [[large public wiki]] without use of [[sysop]] powers at all.		The Anarcopedia's policy effort builds on prior efforts at [[Recyclopedia]] - an attempt to build a [[large public wiki]] without use of [[sysop]] powers at all.

	By contrast, '''~~Anarchopedia~~''' seems not only to embrace but seek to extend the [[NTPOV]] to all aspects of [[wiki governance]] and [[wiki management]]. There are no [[vile mailing list]]s and no [[cabal]] of friends with [[infrastructure owners trust]] as there is at [[Wikipedia]].		By contrast, '''Anarcopedia''' seems not only to embrace but seek to extend the [[NTPOV]] to all aspects of [[wiki governance]] and [[wiki management]]. There are no [[vile mailing list]]s and no [[cabal]] of friends with [[infrastructure owners trust]] as there is at [[Wikipedia]].

	It is also notable for embracing a [[one wiki model]]. It has some problems addressing [[language vs. area]] specializations.		It is also notable for embracing a [[one wiki model]]. It has some problems addressing [[language vs. area]] specializations.

			* https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Anarchopedia

			[[Category:Advocacy]]

Jukeboksi: mv the recyclopedia attacks para fully to talk page, leaving the first sentence of it here.

2005-01-26T12:13:59Z

mv the recyclopedia attacks para fully to talk page, leaving the first sentence of it here.

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:13, 26 January 2005
Line 3:		Line 3:
	It's original stated goal was to let any user [[undelete page]]s, making [[ad hominem delete]] no worse a problem than [[ad hominem revert]]. Without this special power to prevent their opponents from reading the alternative view, it is thought, [[sysop power structure]] will not form at all. Apparently it has not lived up to this goal fully.		It's original stated goal was to let any user [[undelete page]]s, making [[ad hominem delete]] no worse a problem than [[ad hominem revert]]. Without this special power to prevent their opponents from reading the alternative view, it is thought, [[sysop power structure]] will not form at all. Apparently it has not lived up to this goal fully.

	The Anarchopedia's policy effort builds on prior efforts at [[Recyclopedia]] - an attempt to build a [[large public wiki]] without use of [[sysop]] powers at all. This failed however when many pages were renamed, censored, attacked, vandalized and moved by overt supporters of [[Wikimedia]] - ''this is not disputed'' - who had preferential access to [[vandalbot]] technology developed by [[Tim Starling]], - ''this is not disputed'' - a notable advocate of [[technological escalation]] - likely to prevent the [[New Troll point of view]] from spreading. The Recyclopedia failed, and evidence of the above was largely removed from view.		The Anarchopedia's policy effort builds on prior efforts at [[Recyclopedia]] - an attempt to build a [[large public wiki]] without use of [[sysop]] powers at all.

	By contrast, '''Anarchopedia''' seems not only to embrace but seek to extend the [[NTPOV]] to all aspects of [[wiki governance]] and [[wiki management]]. There are no [[vile mailing list]]s and no [[cabal]] of friends with [[infrastructure owners trust]] as there is at [[Wikipedia]].		By contrast, '''Anarchopedia''' seems not only to embrace but seek to extend the [[NTPOV]] to all aspects of [[wiki governance]] and [[wiki management]]. There are no [[vile mailing list]]s and no [[cabal]] of friends with [[infrastructure owners trust]] as there is at [[Wikipedia]].

	It is also notable for embracing a [[one wiki model]]. It has some problems addressing [[language vs. area]] specializations.		It is also notable for embracing a [[one wiki model]]. It has some problems addressing [[language vs. area]] specializations.

142.177.114.179: nothing disputed here, the vandalbot attacks were clearly technological, and there is only one technology to do that to mediawiki, and Tim Starling developed it

2005-01-25T21:30:46Z

nothing disputed here, the vandalbot attacks were clearly technological, and there is only one technology to do that to mediawiki, and Tim Starling developed it

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:30, 25 January 2005
Line 1:		Line 1:
	The '''Anarchopedia''' [http://anarchopedia.org .org] is the first [[large public wiki]] to attempt to eliminate all [[sysop vandalism]]. In the start a policy that any [http://meta.anarchopedia.org/index.php/Special:Listusers registered user] can [[undelete page]]s was declared, which in theory makes [[ad hominem delete]] no worse a problem than [[ad hominem revert]]. Currently the policy does not seem to be fully applied, which is understandable as it gives [[vandal]]s full powers to wreck stuff.		The '''Anarchopedia''' [http://anarchopedia.org .org] is the first [[large public wiki]] to attempt to eliminate all [[sysop vandalism]].

	Without this special power to prevent their opponents from reading the alternative view, it is thought, [[sysop power structure]] will not form at all.		It's original stated goal was to let any user [[undelete page]]s, making [[ad hominem delete]] no worse a problem than [[ad hominem revert]]. Without this special power to prevent their opponents from reading the alternative view, it is thought, [[sysop power structure]] will not form at all. Apparently it has not lived up to this goal fully.

	'''Anarchopedia''' seems not only to embrace but seek to extend the [[NTPOV]] to all aspects of [[wiki governance]] and [[wiki management]]. There are no [[vile mailing list]]s and no [[cabal]] of friends with [[infrastructure owners trust]] as there is at [[Wikipedia]].		The Anarchopedia's policy effort builds on prior efforts at [[Recyclopedia]] - an attempt to build a [[large public wiki]] without use of [[sysop]] powers at all. This failed however when many pages were renamed, censored, attacked, vandalized and moved by overt supporters of [[Wikimedia]] - ''this is not disputed'' - who had preferential access to [[vandalbot]] technology developed by [[Tim Starling]], - ''this is not disputed'' - a notable advocate of [[technological escalation]] - likely to prevent the [[New Troll point of view]] from spreading. The Recyclopedia failed, and evidence of the above was largely removed from view.

			By contrast, '''Anarchopedia''' seems not only to embrace but seek to extend the [[NTPOV]] to all aspects of [[wiki governance]] and [[wiki management]]. There are no [[vile mailing list]]s and no [[cabal]] of friends with [[infrastructure owners trust]] as there is at [[Wikipedia]].

	It is also notable for embracing a [[one wiki model]]. It has some problems addressing [[language vs. area]] specializations.		It is also notable for embracing a [[one wiki model]]. It has some problems addressing [[language vs. area]] specializations.

Jukeboksi: not all Anarchopedia users seem to have undelete rights currently. An interesting theory, but not fully applied and apparently not applicable in practice without a hint of sysopitivity

2005-01-25T14:57:10Z

not all Anarchopedia users seem to have undelete rights currently. An interesting theory, but not fully applied and apparently not applicable in practice without a hint of sysopitivity

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:57, 25 January 2005
Line 1:		Line 1:
	The '''Anarchopedia''' [http://anarchopedia.org .org] is the first [[large public wiki]] to attempt to eliminate all [[sysop vandalism]]. ~~It does this largely by letting~~ any user [[undelete page]]s, ~~making~~ [[ad hominem delete]] no worse a problem than [[ad hominem revert]]. Without this special power to prevent their opponents from reading the alternative view, it is thought, [[sysop power structure]] will not form at all.		The '''Anarchopedia''' [http://anarchopedia.org .org] is the first [[large public wiki]] to attempt to eliminate all [[sysop vandalism]]. In the start a policy that any [http://meta.anarchopedia.org/index.php/Special:Listusers registered user] can [[undelete page]]s was declared, which in theory makes [[ad hominem delete]] no worse a problem than [[ad hominem revert]]. Currently the policy does not seem to be fully applied, which is understandable as it gives [[vandal]]s full powers to wreck stuff.

			Without this special power to prevent their opponents from reading the alternative view, it is thought, [[sysop power structure]] will not form at all.

	'''Anarchopedia''' seems not only to embrace but seek to extend the [[NTPOV]] to all aspects of [[wiki governance]] and [[wiki management]]. There are no [[vile mailing list]]s and no [[cabal]] of friends with [[infrastructure owners trust]] as there is at [[Wikipedia]].		'''Anarchopedia''' seems not only to embrace but seek to extend the [[NTPOV]] to all aspects of [[wiki governance]] and [[wiki management]]. There are no [[vile mailing list]]s and no [[cabal]] of friends with [[infrastructure owners trust]] as there is at [[Wikipedia]].

	It is also notable for embracing a [[one wiki model]]. It has some problems addressing [[language vs. area]] specializations.		It is also notable for embracing a [[one wiki model]]. It has some problems addressing [[language vs. area]] specializations.

Jukeboksi: rm speculation about claimed bot attacks on recyclopedia. We've been through this before, remember?

2005-01-25T14:48:44Z

rm speculation about claimed bot attacks on recyclopedia. We've been through this before, remember?

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:48, 25 January 2005
Line 1:		Line 1:
	The '''Anarchopedia''' [http://anarchopedia.org .org] is the first [[large public wiki]] to attempt to eliminate all [[sysop vandalism]]. It does this largely by letting any user [[undelete page]]s, making [[ad hominem delete]] no worse a problem than [[ad hominem revert]]. Without this special power to prevent their opponents from reading the alternative view, it is thought, [[sysop power structure]] will not form at all.		The '''Anarchopedia''' [http://anarchopedia.org .org] is the first [[large public wiki]] to attempt to eliminate all [[sysop vandalism]]. It does this largely by letting any user [[undelete page]]s, making [[ad hominem delete]] no worse a problem than [[ad hominem revert]]. Without this special power to prevent their opponents from reading the alternative view, it is thought, [[sysop power structure]] will not form at all.

	This builds on prior efforts at [[Recyclopedia]] that were censored/attacked/vandalized by supporters of [[Wikimedia]] who had preferential access to [[vandalbot]] technology developed by [[Tim Starling]], a notable advocate of [[technological escalation]] to prevent the [[New Troll point of view]] from spreading.		'''Anarchopedia''' seems not only to embrace but seek to extend the [[NTPOV]] to all aspects of [[wiki governance]] and [[wiki management]]. There are no [[vile mailing list]]s and no [[cabal]] of friends with [[infrastructure owners trust]] as there is at [[Wikipedia]].

	~~By contrast,~~ '''Anarchopedia''' seems not only to embrace but seek to extend the [[NTPOV]] to all aspects of [[wiki governance]] and [[wiki management]]. There are no [[vile mailing list]]s and no [[cabal]] of friends with [[infrastructure owners trust]] as there is at [[Wikipedia]].

	It is also notable for embracing a [[one wiki model]]. It has some problems addressing [[language vs. area]] specializations.		It is also notable for embracing a [[one wiki model]]. It has some problems addressing [[language vs. area]] specializations.

142.177.10.21 at 15:24, 24 January 2005

2005-01-24T15:24:33Z

New page

The '''Anarchopedia''' [http://anarchopedia.org .org] is the first [[large public wiki]] to attempt to eliminate all [[sysop vandalism]]. It does this largely by letting any user [[undelete page]]s, making [[ad hominem delete]] no worse a problem than [[ad hominem revert]]. Without this special power to prevent their opponents from reading the alternative view, it is thought, [[sysop power structure]] will not form at all.

This builds on prior efforts at [[Recyclopedia]] that were censored/attacked/vandalized by supporters of [[Wikimedia]] who had preferential access to [[vandalbot]] technology developed by [[Tim Starling]], a notable advocate of [[technological escalation]] to prevent the [[New Troll point of view]] from spreading.

By contrast, '''Anarchopedia''' seems not only to embrace but seek to extend the [[NTPOV]] to all aspects of [[wiki governance]] and [[wiki management]]. There are no [[vile mailing list]]s and no [[cabal]] of friends with [[infrastructure owners trust]] as there is at [[Wikipedia]].

It is also notable for embracing a [[one wiki model]]. It has some problems addressing [[language vs. area]] specializations.