Editing Recyclopedia
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''Recyclopedia''' (at [http://www.recyclopedia.info recyclopedia.info]) is probably the most closely aligned [[essential projects|encyclopedia project]] using the [[wikitext standard]] pioneered by [[mediawiki]] and now better implemented in [[GetWiki]]. It appears to be an aspect of the [[Wikinfo]] project. | '''Recyclopedia''' (at [http://www.recyclopedia.info recyclopedia.info]) is probably the most closely aligned [[essential projects|encyclopedia project]] using the [[wikitext standard]] pioneered by [[mediawiki]] and now better implemented in [[GetWiki]]. It appears to be an aspect of the [[Wikinfo]] project. | ||
We might consider these to be the best prototype yet of the future [[Development Wiki]]; It is certainly going to attract like-minded people. | We might consider these to be the best prototype yet of the future [[Development Wiki]]; It is certainly going to attract like-minded people. The odds of a typical [[Recyclopedia contributor]] becoming a [[Consumerium contributor]] are likely much higher than the odds of a [[Wikipedia]], [[Metaweb]] or [[Disinfopedia]] contributor doing so. It seems that it is devoted to presenting a negotiated [[consensus]] between [[Reds]] and [[Greens]] and various [[anarchist]] views. | ||
The odds of a typical [[Recyclopedia contributor]] becoming a [[Consumerium contributor]] are likely much higher than the odds of a [[Wikipedia]], [[Metaweb]] or [[Disinfopedia]] contributor doing so. It seems that it is devoted to presenting a negotiated [[consensus]] between [[Reds]] and [[Greens]] and various [[anarchist]] views. | |||
[[ | ''Accordingly, if a lot of these users come over we may need to recruit some [[Blues]] or [[Pinks]] to balance these rather hardcore views. One problem at a time.'' |