GFDL corpus: Difference between revisions

    From Consumerium development wiki R&D Wiki
    (#REDIRECT GFDL text corpus; but it's no longer JUST a text corpus, many images are now GFDL'd too)
     
    (adapting from Wikinfo article, which hasn't been censored (yet) by the corrupt Wikimedia usurper clique; why CGO must care about this, is RW part of corpus, etc.)
    Line 1: Line 1:
    #REDIRECT [[GFDL text corpus]]
    The '''GFDL corpus''' is the body of all material licensed under GFDL. It includes at least the [[GFDL text corpus]] material made available by:
     
    *[[Wikipedia]]
    *[[Wikinfo]] (except where material is marked as per some other license)
    *[[Disinfopedia]]
    *[[Recyclopedia]] (except where material is marked as per some other license)
    *[[Consumerium:Itself]]
    *[[Consumerpedia]]
    *[[CorpKnowPedia]]
     
    A [[GFDL corpus access provider]] permits retrieval of, and editing of, this material. There are numerous requirements for these due to the [[GFDL]] itself - covered in that article.
     
    There is some hope that a true unified '''GFDL Corpus''' with a single set of editing and forking and reintegration rules might arise given removal of some obstacles (like [[Wikimedia]] and its [[usurper]] clique) and bringing in more ethical players like [[FSF]] and an [[independent board]].  The [[Consumerium Governance Organization]] will probably need to take some interest in this, as it is not going to be possible to integrate input from all the above without some way of making who believes what, why.  The [[Research Wiki]] may or may not be part of the '''corpus'''.

    Revision as of 19:26, 9 April 2004

    The GFDL corpus is the body of all material licensed under GFDL. It includes at least the GFDL text corpus material made available by:

    A GFDL corpus access provider permits retrieval of, and editing of, this material. There are numerous requirements for these due to the GFDL itself - covered in that article.

    There is some hope that a true unified GFDL Corpus with a single set of editing and forking and reintegration rules might arise given removal of some obstacles (like Wikimedia and its usurper clique) and bringing in more ethical players like FSF and an independent board. The Consumerium Governance Organization will probably need to take some interest in this, as it is not going to be possible to integrate input from all the above without some way of making who believes what, why. The Research Wiki may or may not be part of the corpus.